You are here: Home / X2DII / Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner
In this post, I continue testing the XCD 35-100 lens. I mounted the lens to the X2D II, and clipped them onto an Arca Swiss C1 that was perched on a Foba camera stand. I set the camera up as follows:
- ISO 50
- AFS-S
- 14-bit precision
- Mechanical shutter
- 4 second self timer
- Zeiss Siemens star chart at 25 feet
I made a series of five exposures at each focal length in the series 35mm. 60mm. and 100mm, and also at the widest f-stop and whole stops down from that until I reached f/11. I compensated for the f-stops by changing exposure time accordingly.
I developed the images in Lightroom Classic as follows:
- Defaults except …
You are here: Home / X2DII / Hasselblad XCD 100-35 on X2D II, Siemens star, corner
In this post, I continue testing the XCD 35-100 lens. I mounted the lens to the X2D II, and clipped them onto an Arca Swiss C1 that was perched on a Foba camera stand. I set the camera up as follows:
- ISO 50
- AFS-S
- 14-bit precision
- Mechanical shutter
- 4 second self timer
- Zeiss Siemens star chart at 25 feet
I made a series of five exposures at each focal length in the series 35mm. 60mm. and 100mm, and also at the widest f-stop and whole stops down from that until I reached f/11. I compensated for the f-stops by changing exposure time accordingly.
I developed the images in Lightroom Classic as follows:
- Defaults except for the below
- Sharpening off
- Adobe Color profile
- White balanced one of the frames to the gray near the center of the star.
- Exposure tweaks to taste
I picked the best of the 5 frames at each setting. This gave me an opportunity to get an idea of how accurate and repeatable the new Hasselblad lidar based autofocus system is. The answer: pretty accurate but not as repeatable as the Fuji GFX 100 II autofocus. It’s a definite improvement over the mediocre-at-best AF system in the X2D Mark I. The iamges are shown at about 150% magnification.
At 35mm,two-thirds of the way from the center of the frame to the upper left corner:
35mm, corner, f/2.8
Quite sharp for tangential features, not so sharp for radial ones. Astigmatism?
35mm, corner, f/4
A little sharper, but the same idea.
35mm, corner, f/5.6
Now we’ve got good sharpness in both directions.
35mm, corner, f/8
Diffraction is kicking in.
35mm, corner, f/11
A fair amount of diffraction.
At 60mm:
60mm, corner, f/3.5 60mm, corner, f/4
Given that the sharp direction changes so radically between the f/3.5 and f/4 images, I’m inclined to think that the aberration we are seeing here is primarily astigmatism.
60mm, corner, f/5.6
Nice and sharp at f/5.6
60mm, corner, f/8
Losing a bit of sharpness at f/8.
60mm, corner, f/11
Distortion rules at f/11.
100mm:
100mm, corner, f/4 100mm, corner, f/5.6 100mm, corner, f/8 100mm, corner, f/11
These 100mm shots are all good, but not great.
Again, the performance at 35mm and 60mm is excellent for a zoom. The image quality at 100mm is acceptable, but nothing to write home about.