
Crowbar circuits have long been the go-to safeguard against overvoltage conditions, prized for their simplicity and reliability. Th…

Crowbar circuits have long been the go-to safeguard against overvoltage conditions, prized for their simplicity and reliability. Though often overshadowed by newer protection schemes, the crowbar remains a classic protector worth revisiting.
In this quick look, we will refresh the fundamentals, highlight where they still shine, and consider how their enduring design continues to influence modern power systems.
Why “crowbar”?
The name comes from the vivid image of dropping a metal crowbar across live terminals to force an immediate short. That is exactly what the circuit does—when an overvoltage is detected, it slams the supply into a low-resistance state, tripping a fuse or breaker and protecting downstream electronics. The metaphor stuck because it captures the brute-force simplicity and fail-safe nature of this classic protection scheme.

Figure 1 A crowbar protection circuit responds to overvoltage by actively shorting the power supply and disconnecting it to protect the load from damage. Source: Author
Crowbars in the CRT era: When fuses took the fall
In the era of bulky cathode-ray tube (CRT) televisions, power supply reliability was everything. Designers knew that a single regulator fault could unleash destructive voltages into the horizontal output stage or even the CRT itself. The solution was elegantly brutal: the crowbar circuit. Built around a thyristor or silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR), it sat quietly until the supply exceeded the preset threshold.
Then, like dropping a literal crowbar across the rails, it slammed the output into a dead short, blowing the fuse and halting operation in an instant. Unlike softer clamps such as Zener diodes or metal oxide varistors, the crowbar’s philosophy was binary—either safe operation or total shutdown.
For service engineers, this protection often meant the difference between replacing a fuse and replacing an entire deflection board. It was a design choice that reflected the pragmatic toughness of the CRT era: it’s better to sacrifice a fuse than a television.
Beyond CRT televisions, crowbar protection circuits find application in vintage computers, test and measurement instruments, and select consumer products.
Crowbar overvoltage protection
A crowbar circuit is essentially an overvoltage protection mechanism. It remains widely used today to safeguard sensitive electronic systems against transients or regulator failures. By sensing an overvoltage condition, the circuit rapidly “crowbars” the supply—shorting it to ground—thereby driving the source into current limiting or triggering a fuse or circuit breaker to open.
Unlike clamp-type protectors that merely limit voltage to a safe threshold, the crowbar approach provides a decisive shutdown. This makes it particularly effective in systems where even brief exposure to excessive voltage can damage semiconductors, memory devices, or precision analog circuitry. The simplicity of the design, often relying on a silicon-controlled rectifier or triac, ensures fast response and reliable action without adding significant cost or complexity.
For these reasons, crowbar protection continues to be a trusted safeguard in both legacy and modern designs—from consumer electronics to laboratory instruments—where resilience against unpredictable supply faults is critical.

Figure 2 Basic low-power DC crowbar illustrates circuit simplicity. Source: Author
As shown in Figure 2, an overvoltage across the buffer capacitor drives the Zener diode into conduction, triggering the thyristor. The capacitor is then shorted, producing a surge current that blows the local fuse. Once latched, the thyristor reduces the rail voltage to its on-state level, and the sustained current ensures safe disconnection.
Next is a simple practical example of a crowbar circuit designed for automotive use. It protects sensitive electronics if the vehicle’s power supply voltage, such as from a load dump or alternator regulation failure, rises above the safe setpoint. The circuit monitors the supply rail, and when the voltage exceeds the preset threshold, it drives a dead short across the rails. The resulting surge current blows the local fuse, shutting down the supply before connected circuitry can be damaged.

Figure 3 Practical automotive crowbar circuit protects connected device via local fuse action. Source: Author
Crowbar protection: SCR or MOSFET?
Crowbar protection can be implemented with either an SCR or a MOSFET, each with distinct tradeoffs.
An SCR remains the classic choice: once triggered by a Zener reference, it latches into conduction and forces a hard short across the supply rail until the local fuse opens. This rugged simplicity is ideal for high-energy faults, though it lacks automatic reset capability.
A MOSFET-based crowbar, by contrast, can be actively controlled to clamp or disconnect the rail when overvoltage is detected. It offers faster response and lower on-state voltage, which is valuable for modern low-voltage digital rails, but requires more complex drive circuitry and may be less tolerant of large surge currents.
Now I remember working with the LTM4641 μModule regulator, notable for its built-in N-channel overvoltage crowbar MOSFET driver that safeguards the load.
GTO thyristors and active crowbar protection
On a related note, gate turn-off (GTO) thyristors have also been applied in crowbar protection, particularly in high-power systems. Unlike a conventional SCR that latches until the fuse opens or power is removed, a GTO can be actively turned off through its gate, allowing controlled reset after an overvoltage event. This capability makes GTO-based crowbars attractive in industrial and traction applications where sustained shorts are undesirable.
Importantly, GTO thyristors enable “active” crowbars, in contrast to conventional SCRs that latch until power is removed. That is, an active crowbar momentarily shorts the supply during a transient, and gate-controlled turn-off then restores normal operation without intervention. In practice, asymmetric GTO (A-GTO) thyristors are preferred in crowbar protection, while symmetric (S-GTO) types see limited use due to higher losses.
However, their demanding gate-drive requirements and limited surge tolerance have restricted their use in low-voltage supplies, where SCRs remain dominant and MOSFETs or IGBTs now provide more practical and controllable alternatives.

Figure 4 A fast asymmetric GTO thyristor exemplifies speed and strength for demanding power applications. Source: ABB
A wrap-up note
Crowbar circuits may be rooted in classic design, but their relevance has not dimmed. From safeguarding power supplies in the early days of solid-state electronics to standing guard in today’s high-density systems, they remain a simple yet decisive protector. Revisiting them reminds us that not every solution needs to be complex—sometimes, the most enduring designs are those that do one job exceptionally well.
As engineers, we often chase innovation, but it’s worth pausing to appreciate these timeless building blocks. Crowbars embody the principle that reliability and clarity of purpose can outlast trends. Whether you are designing legacy equipment or modern platforms, the lesson is the same: protection is not an afterthought, it’s a foundation.
I will close for now, but there is more to explore in the enduring story of circuit protection. Stay tuned for future posts where we will continue connecting classic designs with modern challenges.
T. K. Hareendran is a self-taught electronics enthusiast with a strong passion for innovative circuit design and hands-on technology. He develops both experimental and practical electronic projects, documenting and sharing his work to support fellow tinkerers and learners. Beyond the workbench, he dedicates time to technical writing and hardware evaluations to contribute meaningfully to the maker community.
Related Content
- SCR Crowbar
- Where is my crowbar?
- Crowbar Speaker Protection
- Overvoltage-protection circuit saves the day
- How to prevent overvoltage conditions during prototyping
The post Crowbar circuits: Revisiting the classic protector appeared first on EDN.