Aberšek B (2024) From chaos to the absurd: existentialism for the 21st century. Philosophies 9(6):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9060168

Article Google Scholar

Akakpo MD (2024) Exploring generative AI with ChatGPT for possible applications in information literacy instruction. Int J Library Inf Sci 12(1):45–62

MathSciNet Google Scholar

Amoore L (2020) Cloud ethics: algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Duke University Press, Durham

Book Google Scholar

Amsberry D (2009) Deconstructing plagiarism: international students and textual borrowing practices. Ref Libr 51(1):31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763870903362183

Article Google Scholar

Arlitsch K, Newell B (2017) Thriving in the age of accelerations: a brief look at the societal effects of artificial intelligence and the opportunities for libraries. J Libr Adm 57(7):789–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.22017.136291

Article Google Scholar

Bailey J (2024) Gradient use of AI. Plagiarism today. https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2024/11/21/the-gradient-of-ai-usage/

Benjamin R (2018) Race after technology: abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity.

Benjamin R (2022) Viral justice: how we grow the world we want. Princeton University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691222882

Book Google Scholar

Bernays EL (1928) Propaganda. Liveright Publishing Corporation, New York

Google Scholar

Bowker L, Kalsatos M, Ruskin A, BuitragoCiro J (2022) Artificial intelligence, machine translation, and academic libraries: improving machine translation literacy on campus. In: Hervieux S, Wheatley A (eds) The rise of AI: implications and applications of artificial intelligence in academic libraries. Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, pp 35–46

Google Scholar

Bridges LM, McElroy K, Welhouse Z (2024) Generative artificial intelligence: 8 critical questions for libraries. J Libr Adm 64(1):66–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2024.2292484

Article Google Scholar

Brooks D (2025) We deserve Pete Hesgseth. NY Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/15/opinion/pete-hegseth-hearings-defense.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Bruijn H, Warnier M, Janssen M (2022) The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI: strategies for explaining algorithmic decision-making. Gov Inf Q 39(2):101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101666

Article Google Scholar

Bubinger H, Dinneen JD (2024) What could go wrong? An evaluation of ethical foresight analysis as a tool to identify problems of AI in libraries. J Acad Librariansh. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102943

Article Google Scholar

Buolamwini J (2024) Unmasking AI: my mission to protect what is human in a world of machines. Random House, New York

Google Scholar

Camus A (1991) The myth of Sisyphus (J. O’Brien, Trans.). Vintage International. (Original work published 1942)

Chaudhuri J, Terrones L (2024) Reshaping academic library information literacy programs in the advent of ChatGPT and other generative AI technologies. Internet Ref Serv Q. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2400132

Article Google Scholar

Chigwada, J. (2024). A proposed framework for a digital literacy course for artificial intelligence in academic libraries. S Afr J libr Inf Sci 90(2):1–8

Crosset V, Dupont B (2022) Cognitive assemblages: the entangled nature of algorithmic content moderation. Big Data Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221143361

Article Google Scholar

D’Amato K (2024) ChatGPT: towards AI subjectivity. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01898-z

Article Google Scholar

Darwin F, Lee J, Alvarez M (2024) Critical thinking in the AI era: an exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. J Lang AI Integr 12(3):45–62

Google Scholar

de Beauvoir S (1964) The ethics of ambiguity 2nd ed.; B. Frechtman, Trans. CitadelPress. (Original work published 1947)

de Beauvoir S (2018) The ethics of ambiguity (B. Frechtman, Trans.). Open Road Media. (Original work published 1947)

Demichelis S (2023) Le dilemme de l’intelligence artificielle: Enjeux éthiques et inégalités sociales. In: Collectif C, Gentelet K (eds) Les intelligences artificielles au prisme de la justice sociale: considering artificial intelligence through the lens of social justice. Presses de l’Université Laval, pp 145–183

Dinscore A (2022) Plagiarism prevention through pedagogy: an instructional design approach. Public Serv Q 18(4):271–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2022.2065404

Article Google Scholar

Donastorg M (2024) Georgia State to build AI literacy program for underserved communities. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. https://www.govtech.com/education/higher-ed/georgia-state-to-build-ai-literacy-program-for-underserved-communities

Dreyfus HL (1996) The current relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment. Electron J Anal Philos 4(4):1–16

Google Scholar

Edmond J, Horsley N, Lehmann J, Priddy M (2022) The trouble with big data: How datafication displaces cultural practices. Bloomsbury Academic, London

Book Google Scholar

Elam M (2023) Signs taken for wonders: AI, art, and the matter of race. In: Browne J, Cave S, Drage E, McInerney K (eds) Feminist AI: critical perspectives on algorithms, data, and intelligent machines. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Google Scholar

el Kaliouby R, Colman C (2021) Girl decoded: a scientist’s quest to reclaim our humanity by bringing emotional intelligence to technology. Currency

Fawaz M, Ingraham KC, Meehan K, Silva L, McDaniel A, Baumann SL (2025) Exploring health sciences students’ perspectives on using generative artificial intelligence. Nurs Health Sci 27(1):4–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.13017

Article Google Scholar

Fleischmann K (2024) Making the case for introducing generative artificial intelligence (AI) into design curricula. Art Des Commun High Educ 23(2):187–207

Floridi L, Cowls J (2019) A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Sci Rev. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1

Article Google Scholar

Floridi L, Cowls J, King TC, Taddeo M (2020) How to design AI for social good: seven essential factors. Sci Eng Ethics 26(3):1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5

Article Google Scholar

Fontes C, Al Haddad C, Antoniou C, Lütge C (2024) Assessing the collective challenges of AI: an applied framework focused on people centeredness and public participation. Urban Gov 4(4):245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2024.12.003

Article Google Scholar

Fox VB (2024) A librarian against AI; or, I think AI should leave. https://violetbfox.info/against-ai/

Galmar B (2024) Building AI literacy for humanities students: teaching beyond generative AI. AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02091-y

Article Google Scholar

Gonsalves C (2024) Generative AI’s impact on critical thinking: revisiting Bloom’s taxonomy. J Mark Educ. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241305980

Article Google Scholar

Gross P (2025) Philly schools could be on the forefront of using AI. Here’s what that means. The Philadelphia Inquirer. https://www.inquirer.com/education/philadelphia-school-district-ai-teachers-administrators-guidelines-20250126.html

Hayles NK (2016) Cognitive assemblages: technical agency and human interactions. Crit Inq 43(1):32–55

Article Google Scholar

Hayles NK (2023) Technosymbiosis: figuring (out) our relations to AI. In: Browne J, Cave S, Drage E, McInerney K (eds) Feminist AI: critical perspectives on algorithms, data, and intelligent machines. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Google Scholar

Heen S, Stone D (2014) Thanks for the feedback: the science and art of receiving feedback well. Viking

Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology. In: Krell DF (eds) Martin Heidegger: Basic writings. Harper & Row, pp 287–317. (Original work published 1954)

Ho CC (2024) Using AI-generative tools in tertiary education: reflections on their effectiveness in improving tertiary students’ english writing abilities. Online Learn 28(3):33–54

Google Scholar

Husserl E (1982) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: first book (F. Kersten, Trans.). Springer. (Original work published 1913)

Jie R (2024) Rethinking ethical identity in the age of artificial intelligence. Interdiscip Stud Lit 8(3):541–553

Karpouzis K (2024) Plato’s shadows in the digital cave: controlling cultural bias in generative AI. Electronics 13(8):1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13081457

Article Google Scholar

Kelly R (2025) 3 areas where AI will impact higher Ed Most in 2025. Campus Technology. https://campustechnology.com/Articles/2025/01/15/3-Areas-Where-AI-Will-Impact-Higher-Ed-in-2025.aspx

Keyes O (2023) Automating autism. In: Browne J, Cave S, Drage E, McInerney K (eds) Feminist AI: critical perspectives on algorithms, data, and intelligent machines. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 145–183

Google Scholar

Kim HJ, Uysal H (2021) Shifting the discourse of plagiarism and ethics: a cultural opportunity in higher education. Int J Ethics Educ 6:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-020-00113-z

Article Google Scholar

Kirschenbaum M (2016) Track changes: a literary history of word processing. Harvard University Press, Harvard. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjghx3t

Book Google Scholar

Kirschenbaum M (2024) Facsimile machines. Poetics Today 45(2):325–329. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-11092977

Article Google Scholar

Krakowski A, Greenwald E, Hurt T, Nonnecke B, Cannady MA (2022) Authentic integration of ethics and AI through sociotechnical, problem-based learning. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 36(11):12774–12782. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21556

Article Google Scholar

Li FF (2023) The worlds I see: curiosity, exploration, and discovery at the dawn of AI. Flatiron books: a moment of lift book

Licklider JCR (1960) Man–computer symbiosis. IRE Trans Hum Factors Electron HFE-1:4–11

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Lo L (2023a) My new favorite research partner is an AI: what roles can librarians play in the future? Coll Res Libr News 84(6):209. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.6.209

Article Google Scholar

Lo L (2023b) The CLEAR path: a framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. J Acad Librariansh 49(4):102720

Article Google Scholar

Lo L (2024) Evaluating AI literacy in academic libraries: a survey study with a focus on U.S. employees. Coll Res Libr 85(5):635–668. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.5.635

Article Google Scholar

Mallon MN, Burriss S, Wesolek A, Smiley BL (In Review). Toward a new framework for human-centered librarianship in the age of AI and beyond. In: Michalak R, Boughida K (eds) AI in academic libraries: navigating the future. ACRL Publishing

Mantello P, Ho M-T (2024) Emotional AI and the future of wellbeing in the post-pandemic workplace. AI & Soc J Knowl Cult Commun 39(4):1883–1889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01639-8

Article Google Scholar

Marzuki, Widiati U, Rusdin DD, Indrawati I (2023) The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Educ 10(2):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Article Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M (2012) Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945)

Meshi A (2024) GPT-ME: a human-AI cognitive assemblage. Proc ACM Comput Graph Interact Tech 7(4):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3664214

Article Google Scholar

Michalak R (2023) From ethics to execution: the role of academic librarians in artificial intelligence (AI) policy-making at colleges and universities. J Libr Adm 63(7):928–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2023.2262367

Article Google Scholar

Michalak R (2024) Suits meet the stacks: drawing emotional intelligence (EQ) parallels for academic libraries. J Libr Adm 64(7):845–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2024.2388499

Article Google Scholar

Michalak R, Ellixson D (2024) Buy versus build: navigating artificial intelligence (AI) tool adoption in academic libraries. Inf Serv Use 0(0):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/18758789241296755

Article Google Scholar

Michalak R, Rysavy M, Hunt K, Smith B, Worden J (2017) Faculty perceptions of plagiarism: insight for librarians’ information literacy programs. Coll Res Libr 79(6):747. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.6.747

Article Google Scholar

Mitchell-Yellin B (2024) AI is here to stay, so we may as well learn to use it? That’s a cop-out. THE. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/ai-here-stay-so-we-may-well-learn-use-it-thats-cop-out

Mollick E (2024) Co-Intelligence. Random House, London

Google Scholar

Murray MD (2024) Tools do not create human authorship in the use of generative artificial intelligence. J Law Technol Internet 15(1):76–90

Google Scholar

Narayanan A, Kapoor A (2024) AI snake oil: What artificial intelligence can do, what it can’t, and how to tell the difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Book Google Scholar

Noble S (2018) Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press, New York

Book Google Scholar

O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group, New York

Google Scholar

Orbik Z (2024) Husserl’s concept of transcendental consciousness and the problem of AI consciousness. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 23(5):1151–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-024-09993-8

Article Google Scholar

Owen W, Michalak SC (2015) Engine of innovation: building the high performance catalog. Inf Technol Libr 34(2):5–18. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5702

Article Google Scholar

Paulus M (In Review) Information, automation, and virtue: a framework for designing new information processes and practices. In: Michalak R, Boughida K (eds) AI and Academic Libraries. ACRL Press

Pecorari D (2001) Plagiarism and international students: how the English-speaking University responds

Ramamurthy P (2023) Gen AI: should you build or buy? CIO (13284045), N.PAG. https://www.cio.com/

Ren S, Tomlinson B, Black RW, Torrance AW (2024) Reconciling the contrasting narratives on the environmental impact of large language models. Sci Rep 14(1):26310

Renieris EM (2023) Beyond data: reclaiming human rights at the dawn of the metaverse. MIT Press, Cambridge

Book Google Scholar

Ridley M (2022) Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): adoption and advocacy. Inf Technol Libr 41(2):1–17. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v41i2.14683

Article Google Scholar

Ridley M, Pawlick-Potts D (2021) Algorithmic literacy and the role for libraries. Inf Technol Libr 40(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12963

Article Google Scholar

Sartre J-P (1956) Being and nothingness: an essay in phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Methuen. (Original work published 1943)

Schüller K (2022) Data and AI literacy for everyone. Stat J IAOS 38:477–490. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-220941

Article Google Scholar

Searle J (1984) Minds, brains, and science. Harvard University Press, Harvard

Google Scholar

Shadbolt N, Hampson R (2024) As if human: ethics and artificial intelligence. Yale University Press, New York

Book Google Scholar

Smith MR (2024) Integrating morality into generative AI libraries maintaining the human in the AI Regime. Theol Librariansh 17(2):23–27. https://doi.org/10.31046/fsx6ek95

Article Google Scholar

Stamboliev E (2024) Proposing a postcritical AI literacy. J Crit AI Stud 2(3):45–67

Google Scholar

Tao Y, Viberg O, Baker RS, Kizilcec RF (2023) Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models. PNAS Nexus 3(9):346. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae346

Article Google Scholar

Thomson I (2019) Technology, ontoetheology, education. Heidegger on Technology, edited by Aaron James Wendland, et al., Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. ProQuest Ebook Central. https://www.proquest.com/legacydocview/EBC/5580490?accountid=38531.

Ubah UE (2024) Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialism: the link. WritingThreeSixty; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): WritingThreeSixty: The Artificial Intelligence Special Issue 2024: Relaunch of WritingThreeSixty; 2708–6119; https://doi.org/10.14426/Writing360.V7i1

Wang C, Aguilar SJ, Bankard JS, Bui E, Nye B (2024) Writing with AI: what college students learned from utilizing ChatGPT for a writing assignment. Educ Sci 14(9):976. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090976

Article Google Scholar

Watkins T, Johnson Q (2024) AI and machine learning: what to know and how to talk about it to researchers and patrons. Inf Serv Use 44:327–332

Google Scholar

Wheatley A, Hervieux S (2022) Separating artificial intelligence from science fiction: creating an academic library workshop series on AI literacy. In: Hervieux S, Wheatley A (eds) The rise of AI: implications and applications of artificial intelligence in academic libraries. Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, pp 61–70

Google Scholar

Wilcox L (2023) No humans in the loop: Killer robots, race, and AI. In: Browne J, Cave S, Drage E, McInerney K (eds) Feminist AI: critical perspectives on algorithms, data, and intelligent machines. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Google Scholar

Williams S (2001) Arguing AI: the battle for twenty-first-century science. Random House, London

Google Scholar

Wrathall M (2019) The task of thinking in a technological age. Heidegger on Technology, edited by Aaron James Wendland, et al., Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. ProQuest Ebook Central. https://www.proquest.com/legacydocview/EBC/5580490?accountid=38531.

Wright A (2014) Cataloging the world: Paul Otlet and the birth of the information age. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Google Scholar

Yuan H, Che Z, Li S, Zhang Y, Hu X, Luo S (2024) The high dimensional psychological profile and cultural bias of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.03387

Yao Y (2022) Symbols-Meaning-Value (SMV) space as a basis for a conceptual model of data science. Int J Approx Reason 144:113–128