Here’s an example of a system of equations I came across.

[\left{\begin{array}{l} & 4x & - & 3y & = & -17 \ - & 2x & + & y & = & 7 \end{array} \right.]

There’s a fast way to solve this, which is to take two of the lower equation and add to the upper equation. This makes the (x)’s cancel out and removes some of the (y)’s, leaving us with

[-y = - 17 + 2 \times 7]

which is easy to mentally rearrange into

[y = 3]

and, looking at the lower equation, this must mean that

[x = -2]

We have solved the system of equations, and it was quite fast. Also, it was in our heads.

In school, I was taught a different method. I was taught to rearrange one of the equations and substitute into the other. This leads to something like turning the lower equation into

[y = 7 + 2x]

and then plopping it into the upper equation, which yields

[4x - 3\left(7 + 2x\right) = -17]

and it gets kind of messy and is not trivial to keep straight in the head.

It is very satisfying to take an entire equation, add it a few times to one of the others, and get something simpler fall out. When it works out, it looks magical to an audience! But you have to pick the right scaling factor. we could have aimed for canceling out the (y)’s instead, by adding the lower equation three times to the upper. But that would have ended us up with

[-2x = -17 + 21]

which, when we see it on paper like this, we can tell is

[x=-2]

but it’s not quite as clear to do in the head because it results in bigger numbers to subtract and add.