%pip install pipescript
%load_ext pipescript

# Render a sorted version of a tuple
>>> tup = (3, 4, 1, 5, 6)
>>> tup |> sorted |> tuple
(1, 3, 4, 5, 6)

pipescript

Pipescript is an IPython extension that brings a pipe operator |> and powerful placeholder and macro expansion syntax extensions to IPython and Jupyter.

If you’re familiar with the magrittr package for R, then you’ll be right at home with pipescript.

Getting Started

Run the following in IPython or Jupyter to install pipescript and load the extension:

%pip install pipescript
%load_ext pipescript

The %load_ext pipescript invocation is what enables the new pipe syntax in your current session.

Features by Example

Let’s look at a few examples to give a flavor of what you can do with pipescript:

# Render a sorted version of a tuple
>>> tup = (3, 4, 1, 5, 6)
>>> tup |> sorted |> tuple
(1, 3, 4, 5, 6)

The above example showcases the |>, or "pipe", operator, which is a much-loved feature of functional programming that has become increasingly mainstream. Its primary benefit is that the flow of execution follows natural left-to-right reading / writing order of the code. Whether or not such pipeline syntax is available, it’s not uncommon for programmers to execute pipelines like the above multiple times during to verify the computation at each step, particularly in interactive programming environments like Jupyter. With |>, this type of incremental verification becomes a breeze: first execute tup |> sorted, then append |> tuple to execute the full chain tup |> sorted |> tuple, each time using the last-expression rendering capabilities of the notebook or REPL to inspect and verify the result.

Placeholders

The power of the |> operator is amplified via placeholder syntax for implicit function construction: for pipescript, we use $ to stand in for function arguments and induce function creation:

# Sort a list in reverse order
>>> lst = [3, 4, 1, 5, 6]
>>> lst |> sorted($, reverse=True)
[6, 5, 4, 3, 1]

$ is analogous to magrittr’s . placeholder. It can also be used outside of pipeline contexts:

# Sort a list in reverse order and print the result
lst = [3, 4, 1, 5, 6]
reverse_sorter = sorted($, reverse=True)

# The following are equivalent:
print(reverse_sorter(lst))
lst |> reverse_sorter |> print

Each time $ appears, it represents a new argument, so sorted($, reverse=$) represents a function with two arguments:

import random

# Sort a list in either ascending or descending order with probablility 0.5:
lst = [3, 4, 1, 5, 6]
sorter = sorted($, reverse=$)
reverse = random.random() < 0.5

# The following are equivalent:
print(sorter(lst, reverse))
lst |> sorter($, reverse) |> print

Placeholders can appear anywhere – not just as arguments to function calls:

# Sort a list and find the position of element 4:
>>> lst = [3, 4, 1, 5, 6]
>>> lst |> sorted |> $.index(3)
1

Named Placeholders

There are situations that would benefit from referencing the same placeholder multiple times, for which pipescript permits named placeholders by prefixing $ to an identifier:

# Pair even entries from a range with their adjacent odd entry
range(6) |> list |> zip($v[::2], $v[1::2]) |> list
>>> [(0, 1), (2, 3), (4, 5)]

In the above example, we could have used any name for $v, the important thing is that the same name was used – otherwise pipescript would have induced a function with two arguments instead of one.

Undetermined Pipelines

Similar to magrittr’s behavior, if any number of placeholders appear in the first step of an pipescript pipeline, this undetermined pipeline will represent a function:

>>> second_largest_value = $ |> sorted($, reverse=True) |> $[1]
>>> [3, 8, 6, 5, 1] |> second_largest_value
6

Macros and Partial Function Syntax

In some cases, it may be desirable to curry a function with parameters at its start, akin to the typical usage of functools.partial. For example:

>>> add_reducer = reduce(lambda x, y: x + y, $, $)
>>> add_reducer([1, 2, 3], 0)
6
>>> add_reducer([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]], [])
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

To avoid writing out a $ placeholder for each and every tail argument, you can prefix the call itself with a $ and omit subsequent arguments, just like in coconut:

>>> add_reducer = reduce$(lambda x, y: x + y)
>>> add_reducer([1, 2, 3], 0)
6
>>> add_reducer([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]], [])
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Or even more simply, since the induced partial function retains all the same argument defaults as the original reduce, we can omit the base case:

>>> add_reducer = reduce$(lambda x, y: x + y)
>>> add_reducer([1, 2, 3])
6
>>> add_reducer([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]])
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

For common functional programming tools like map, reduce, and filter, the above pattern is so common that pipescript provides corresponding macros, in which the function used to curry each higher order function is specified between brackets:

>>> add_reducer = reduce[lambda x, y: x + y]
>>> [1, 2, 3] |> add_reducer
6
>>> [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]] |> add_reducer
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

We’re still writing out lambda x, y: x + y, which is kind of tedious – for these kinds of simple lambda constructions, pipescript provides a quick lambda macro, f:

>>> add_reducer = reduce[f[$ + $]]
>>> [1, 2, 3] |> add_reducer
6
>>> [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]] |> add_reducer
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

f can also be used on its own:

>>> f[$ + $](2, 3)
5

>>> f[$a*$b + $b*$c + $a*$c](2, 3, 4)
26

Furthermore, pipescript allows you to omit the f from higher order functional macros, so that you can simply do add_reducer = reduce[$ + $] instead. Here are a couple of nifty constructions utilizing this compact syntax:

# factorial
>>> range(1, 5) |> reduce[$ * $]
24

# compute a number from decimal digits
>>> [2, 3, 4] |> reduce[10*$ + $]
234

Additional Pipe Operators

There are a few other variants of the |> operator offered by pipescript, covered in this section.

Assignment Pipe

The assignment pipe, |>>, writes the left hand side value to the variable whose name is specified on the right hand side. Furthermore, it evaluates to the left hand side value. For example:

>>> 2 |> $ + 2 |>> two_plus_two |> $ + 3 |>> two_plus_two_plus_three
7
>>> (two_plus_two, two_plus_two_plus_three)
(4, 7)

Varargs Pipe

The varargs pipe, *|>, unpacks the iterable on the left hand side before passing its values as inputs to the function on the right hand side. For example:

# Add two numbers:
>>> (2, 3) *|> $ + $
5

A common pattern is using *|> to expand an undetermined pipeline appearing inside of a map[...]:

# Take the product of consecutive pairs of even-odd integers
>>> consecutive_pairs = range(10) |> list |> ($v[::2], $v[1::2]) *|> zip
>>> consecutive_pairs |> map[$ *|> $ * $] |> list
[0, 6, 20, 42, 72]

Function Pipe

The other commonly used pipe is the function pipe, .>, which is used to compose the functions specified on the left hand side and right hand side together, with the function on the left hand side being applied first in the composition (note that this behavior is reversed from normal function composition, but follows the flow of data better). For example:

>>> reverse = reversed .> list
>>> [1, 2, 3] |> reverse
[3, 2, 1]

Other Pipes

Besides |>>, *|>, and .>, pipescript offers a few less commonly used operators as well. The below table describes the complete set of forward pipe operators available:

Operator	Pipescript Syntax	Python Syntax
`	>`	`y = x
`	>>`	`x
`*	>`	`y = x *
`**	>`	`y = x **
.>	h = g .> f	h = lambda *a, **kw: g(f(*a, **kw))
*.>	h = g *.> f	h = lambda *a, **kw: g(*f(*a, **kw))
**.>	h = g **.> f	h = lambda *a, **kw: g(**f(*a, **kw))
?>	y = x ?> f	y = None if x is None else f(x)
*?>	y = x *?> f where x is an iterable, or None	y = None if x is None else f(*x)
**?>	y = x **?> f where x is a dict, or None	y = None if x is None else f(**x)
$>	g = x $> f	g = functools.partial(f, x)
*$>	g = x *$> f where x is an iterable	g = functools.partial(f, *x)
**$>	g = x **$> f where x is a dict	g = functools.partial(f, **x)

Except for |>>, each and every operator has a corresponding backward variant; e.g. <| is the backward variant of |> and is a low-precedence apply. For example:

>>> reversed .> list <| [1, 2, 3]
[3, 2, 1]

All pipe operators are applied in order from left to right (including backward pipes). Furthermore, all pipe operators are left associative and operate at the same precedence as | (bitwise or), meaning that any pipeline steps that include an | binary operation must be wrapped in parentheses.

Additional Macros and Helper Utilities

do macro

Similar to toolz, pipescript offers a do macro implementing something similar to the following higher order function:

def do(func, obj):
func(obj)
return obj

In the case of pipescript, the input function func is specified inside of brackets, just as with other functional macros:

>>> 2 |> $ + 2 |> do[print] |> $ + 2 |>> result
4
6

While any function expression, including undetermined pipelines, can appear inside do[...] brackets, do[print] is so common that pipescript provides a peek utility that implements the very same:

>>> 2 |> $ + 2 |> peek |> $ + 2 |>> result
4
6

To suppress the automatic expression rendering of a pipeline result, pipescript also offers a null utility function (as in /dev/null), which essentially swallows its input:

>>> 2 |> $ + 2 |> peek |> $ + 2 |>> result |> null
4

fork and parallel macros

If you wish to move beyond linear chains and apply the same input to multiple pipelines, pipescript provides fork and parallel macros, which return the results of each function as a tuple:

>>> range(10) |> list |> fork[
map[2 * $] .> filter[$ % 3 == 0],
map[3 * $] .> filter[$ % 2 == 0],
]
([0, 6, 12, 18], [0, 6, 12, 18, 24])

parallel does the same thing as fork but executes each function passed to it concurrently.

when macro

The when macro takes as input a value and conditional expression that, upon passing, forwards the value, and upon failing, terminates computation with None. It is particularly powerful when combined with fork and collapse (the latter of which extracts the non-null value out of the tuple that results from the fork):

# Define a `collatz` utility and run it up to 20 times on 42
>>> collatz = when[$ != 1] .> fork[
when[$ % 2 == 0] .> $ // 2,
when[$ % 2 == 1] .> $ * 3 + 1,
] .> collapse .> peek
>>> 42 |> collatz ** 20
21
64
32
16
8
4
2
1

Right, I forgot to mention that you can exponentiate single-argument functions in pipescript, so that we don’t need to write out 42 |> collatz |> collatz |> ... |> collatz.

future macro

Finally, to schedule a function to run in another thread and immediately return a future to the eventual result, pipescript provides a future macro:

>>> 2 |> future[$ + 2] |> $.result()
4
>>> [1, 2, 3] |> future[sum] |> $.result()
6

Placeholder Scope

A natural question is: how does pipescript know what part of the code should be included in the body of the function induced by placeholder use? The rules are as follows:

1. If there is a macro or pipeline step enclosing the placeholder, the induced function body includes the "smallest" such enclosing macro or pipeline step.
2. Otherwise, the function body expands to include the nearest "chain" of function calls, attribute accesses, and / or subscript accesses.

An example of a "chain" would be something like np.array($).T.astype(int), which induces a lambda that converts its argument to a numpy array, transposes it, and then converts the result to use int64 dtype. That is, the lambda body expands to include not just np.array($), but the entire "chain" in the expression.

To see a concrete example of where this matters, consider the following two placeholder expressions:

# The following sorters do different things!
sorter1 = sorted($, key=$[1])
sorter2 = sorted($, key=f[$[1]])

sorter1 is a function that takes two arguments: a sequence, and a list of functions, the second of which will be used to compute the sort key, which it then uses to sort the first argument. sorter2, on the other hand, is a function that takes a single argument, which is a sequence that it sorts using the second element of each value in said sequence value as sort key. In most cases, sorter2 probably gives the desired behavior.

Optional Chaining, Permissive Attribute Chaining, and Nullish Coalescing

Pipescript also provides typescript-style optional chaining and nullish coalescing. That is, a?.b.c.d().e resolves to None when a is None, as does a?.(). Also, a ?? obj evaluates to obj only when a is None, but evaluates to a whenever a is some other falsey value like "", 0, False, or []. Note that, like normal boolean or, the nullish coalescing operator ?? is lazy and will not evaluate expressions on its right hand side when its left hand side is not None.

Unlike Javascript, Python does not resolve unavailable attribute accesses to undefined, but will rather throw AttributeError. In pipescript, if you would like to perform some kind of permissive attribute access like in Javascript, you can use the permissive chaining operator .? (where the ? appears after the .) and access b as a.?b, which is equivalent to getattr(a, "b", None). Note however that if the aforementioned expression resolves to None, something like a.?b.c will still throw an AttributeError – to avoid that, you need to combine both permissive attribute chaining and optional chaining as a.?b?.c.

Performance Overhead

Because pipescript is implemented using instrumentation (see How it works), it does incur overhead. For top-level code written in a Jupyter cell (e.g., code that doesn’t have any indentation), the additional overhead generally doesn’t matter, as it tends to be insignificant when compared to data-intensive dataframe operations and SQL queries common in data science workloads. For code invoked repeatedly in loop bodies or function calls, however, this overhead can become noticeable; as such, pipescript syntax is not enabled by default in these contexts. To opt into pipescript syntax in loops and bodies, use the allow_pipelines_in_loops_and_calls context manager / decorator.

Example of how to embed an pipescript pipeline in a function body:

@allow_pipelines_in_loops_and_calls
def compute_first_k_sums_of_squares(k):
lst = []
for i in range(1, k + 1):
i |> $ ** 2 |> $ + sum(lst) |> do[lst.append($)]
return lst

Such functions can be used as normal:

>>> 10 |> compute_first_k_sums_of_squares
[1, 5, 15, 37, 83, 177, 367, 749, 1515, 3049]

Example of embedding a pipeline in a loop:

lst = []
with allow_pipelines_in_loops_and_calls():
for i in range(1, 101):
i |> $ ** 2 |> $ + sum(lst) |> do[lst.append($)]

More Examples

I developed pipescript while working on Advent of Code 2025 in parallel, and used it for most of the input processesing portions of my solutions. You can find these solutions at https://github.com/smacke/aoc2025. In particular, the solution for day 6 showcases the upper limits of what is possible with pipescript. Note however that it is optimized for pipescript usage and not readability, which I generally wouldn’t recommend.

What pipescript is and is not

For now, pipescript is not a general purpose functional programming language on top of Python. It is very much not intended for production use cases, and instead caters toward quick-and-dirty one-off / scratchpad type computations in IPython and Jupyter specifically. In short, pipescript aims to provide simple but powerful pipeline and placeholder syntax to interactive Python programming environments.

Particularly, pipescript is:

• Currently only for interactive Python environments built on top of IPython, such as Jupyter, or IPython itself
• Just a library you can install from PyPI, compatible with a wide range of Python 3 versions – no fancy installation instructions, no complicated language distribution to install
• Fully compatible with all existing Python standard and third-party libraries that you already know and love, since it’s just Python function calls under the hood

All the different pipeline operators like |>, <|, *|>, etc. essentially transpile down to an instrumented variant of the bitwise-or (|) operator, and therefore every new operator left-associates at the same level of precedence, meaning that pipeline steps run from left to right in the order that they appear. Pipescript aims to optimize for simplicity, readability / writability, and predictability over feature completeness (though I’d like to think it strikes a fairly good balance in this regard). Pipescript may be expanded beyond IPython / Jupyter depending on traction.

How it works

Pipescript works by transforming syntax in two stages. First, it rewrites token spans like |> and *|> that are illegal in Python to legal ones – for the previous examples, both spans are rewritten to bitwise or, |. After these transformations, the resulting code is valid (but likely not runnable) Python syntax. Pipescript uses the pyccolo library to perform these rewrites, which remembers the positions of the rewrites where they occurred, so that the eventual ast.BinOp AST node can be associated with the |> operator.

Pyccolo is a library I developed during my PhD which provides an event-driven architecture for declarative AST transformations. Its key selling point is that it allows you to layer multiple AST transformations on top of each other in a composable fashion. In short, you specify handlers for different AST nodes such as ast.BinOp, and pyccolo instruments these nodes by emitting events for them, so that when the code runs, all the handlers for a particular event are run. Such event handlers are what allow us to change the behavior of ast.BinOp nodes that have been associated with various custom operators like |>.

Because the same event emission transformation can be leveraged by multiple associated handlers, you generally don’t need to worry about said transformations rewriting the AST in ways that conflict with each other. This composability lies in stark contrast with the challenges you would face if you were to just create a bunch of ast.NodeTransformer instances to perform transformations. The strategy employed by pyccolo therefore allows for incremental and iterative feature development without requiring large rewrites as new features are introduced.

To summarize, pipescript rewrites its syntax to valid Python, and then runs this Python in an instrumented fashion using pyccolo. Because everything is just running in Python, pipescript is effectively a Python superset, and because the transformed Python that is instrumented is fairly similar visually to pipescript syntax, various Jupyter ergonomical features like readable stack traces and jedi-based autocomplete can continue to function as normal (for the most part).

Implementation-wise, thanks to pyccolo’s heavy lifting, I was able to implement the initial release of pipescript entirely over the course of time off during the 2025 holiday season. At the time of this writing, pipescript occupies fewer than 2000 lines of code (excluding tests), each of which was produced without the help of any AI agents.

Inspiration

Pipescript draws inspiration largely from magrittr, but also from efforts like coconut (a functional superset of Python), as well as from libraries like Pipe and toolz which fill some of Python’s pipe and functional programming gaps with elegant APIs.

Disclaimer

Warning: use pipescript at your own risk!. It is very much not guaranteed to be bug-free – I implemented it in a hurry before it was time to go back to work.

License

Code in this project licensed under the BSD-3-Clause License.