A few years ago, some of the Teclast T60 Pro’s features would have been considered luxury class: A chic metal casing, the pen input with 4,096 pressure levels or the LTE support even including navigation capability.

In other areas, however, you realize that you are only looking at a tablet for around US$ 220: The performance is OK for everyday use, but quickly reaches its limits with more demanding tasks. The battery life is only average and charging takes a long time.

The cameras are more of a makeshift and the display is quite dark. The colors are bluish, but users who are plagued by PWM can rejoice, as we did not notice any flickering.

If you don’t have much of a budget or are looking for a well-equipped second tablet, you should definitely take a look at the Teclast T60 Pro.

Pros

+ very affordable

+ high-quality metal housing

+ Integrated LTE and GPS

+ Pen input

+ PWM-free IPS display

+ constant performance under load

+ many Bluetooth audio codecs

Cons

• Display dark

• only sufficient performance

• Cameras hardly usable

• Battery life only average

• long battery charging times

• no fingerprint sensor

• outdated security patches

• no sustainability efforts

At the time of this review, you pay around US$ 220 for the tablet on temu.com.

• $12.98

GXLYFG 2 Pack Tempered Glass Screen Protectors Compatible with Teclast T60 Pro, 12 inch Full Coverage,Anti Scratch, Bubble Free, 9H Hardness

• $19.98

Case for TECLAST T60 Pro 12-Inch Tablet,Shockproof PU Leather Cover with Hand Strap, Two-Fold Stand,Compatible with T60 Pro 12" Android Tablet (Blue)

• $15.99

Hoibon for TECLAST T60 Tablet 2024 Tablet case with [Kickstand] [Case for Kids Kids Friendly] Shockproof Silicone Case Tablet Protective Kickstand Cover for TECLAST T60 Android 14 (Black)

Table of Contents

1. Verdict on the Teclast T60 Pro
2. Specifications
3. Case and features - metal housing with concealed antennas
4. Communication and operation - Slow 60 Hz screen
5. Software and sustainability - Outdated security
6. Cameras - Hardly usable for photos
7. Display - Dark and bluish
8. Performance, emissions and battery life - Doesn’t last as long
9. Notebookcheck overall rating
10. Possible alternatives in comparison

Processor

Mediatek Helio G99, 2 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76, 6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

Memory

8 GB

Display

12.00 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 194 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 99 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gravity, Distance, Hall, Gyroscope, Compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/5/8), 4G (Band 1/3/5/7/8/20/34/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 278.6 x 174 ( = 0.31 x 10.97 x 6.85 in)

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 Watt charging

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

553 g ( = 19.51 oz / 1.22 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Price

160 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Teclast packs the T60 Pro tablet into a metal casing, which actually manages without a plastic area for better reception: the manufacturer has cleverly integrated the antennas into the camera module. The only color available is Space Grey, which reminds us of Apple tablets. The workmanship is clean and the tablet feels good in the hand.

However, creaking can be provoked when the 12-inch tablet is twisted.

8 GB RAM and 128 GB mass storage are the standard features in this price range. The memory can be expanded via a microSD reader, and the reader worked at an average speed in our review with the reference microSD Angelbird V60. You can therefore store data, but should not expect high-speed transfer.

GPS is also on board so that you can determine the position of the tablet and also use it for navigation in the car.

Teclast T60 Pro Teclast Art Pad Pro Vale V12X Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 DIN A5 ❌

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)

47.2 MB/s +23%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)

44.2 MB/s +15%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)

38.5 MB/s

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)

36.7 MB/s -5%

Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=50, last 2 years)

36.5 MB/s -5%

Teclast T60 Pro; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.8 (25.8-48.2)

Teclast T60 Pro; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.5 (42.1-81.2)

WiFi 5 is installed as the fastest WiFi standard. The tablet achieves the usual data rates of up to around 370 MBit/s. However, there are sometimes significant drops in speed, especially when transmitting.

It is great that the Teclast T60 Pro even comes with a cellular module, making it less dependent on a WiFi network. However, there are not many frequencies available here.

The touchscreen responds well to inputs, but the screen can only display a maximum of 60 images per second. This makes operation feel somewhat slower than on tablets with faster screens.

It is possible to use an active stylus; the manufacturer offers the Teclast T-Pen here, but also supports the universal USI 2.0 protocol. However, there is no magentic storage for the pen on the tablet.

There is also no fingerprint sensor for biometric recognition of the user.

Networking Teclast T60 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000

252 (min: 113) MBit/s ∼42%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

362 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼53%

Vale V12X 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000

259 (min: 136) MBit/s ∼43%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

344 (min: 262) MBit/s ∼50%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000

197.4 (min: 104) MBit/s ∼33%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

327 (min: 274) MBit/s ∼47%

Teclast Art Pad Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000

235 (min: 163) MBit/s ∼39%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

332 (min: 215) MBit/s ∼48%

Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

338 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼56%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼48%

Average of class Tablet

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

601 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

689 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼100%

Android 15 is pre-installed on the tablet. Teclast makes an effort to optimize operation with a sidebar and easier access to the system menu in two-handed mode. However, there are not too many changes compared to the stock Android.

The security patches date back to August 2025 and are therefore clearly out of date.

There is no further information on sustainability. Plastic film is used for the packaging.

Recording front camera

The 13-megapixel camera on the back only takes low-contrast photos and is quickly overwhelmed with a wide dynamic range. Images in low light become very grainy.

The front camera with 8 megapixels also has problems with large differences in brightness and takes rather bluish photos that only show coarse details.

Overall, the cameras can be used for documenting situations and sometimes scanning a document. However, they are not suitable for photo enthusiasts.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light

click to load images

8.4 ∆E

13.3 ∆E

19.1 ∆E

11.3 ∆E

17.1 ∆E

10 ∆E

13.5 ∆E

20.6 ∆E

13.9 ∆E

10.8 ∆E

10.1 ∆E

8.1 ∆E

15.4 ∆E

11.4 ∆E

14.9 ∆E

6.1 ∆E

13.8 ∆E

18.1 ∆E

2.3 ∆E

8.8 ∆E

11.4 ∆E

12.8 ∆E

4.5 ∆E

5.1 ∆E

ColorChecker Teclast T60 Pro: 11.7 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 20.64 ∆E

29.6 ∆E

54.2 ∆E

39.8 ∆E

34.1 ∆E

45.6 ∆E

61.5 ∆E

52.6 ∆E

34.8 ∆E

44.3 ∆E

29.4 ∆E

64.3 ∆E

63.9 ∆E

31.2 ∆E

47.1 ∆E

37.8 ∆E

76.1 ∆E

44.6 ∆E

41.6 ∆E

89.7 ∆E

70.6 ∆E

52 ∆E

36.9 ∆E

24.4 ∆E

13.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Teclast T60 Pro: 46.67 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 89.72 ∆E

The 12-inch display is not particularly bright: we measured a maximum of 322 cd/m². This means it is only suitable for outdoor use on very cloudy days or in the shade.

The color reproduction is also not really convincing: it is very bluish.

However, the IPS screen does not use PWM for brightness dimming and is therefore also suitable for more sensitive users.

295 cd/m²309 cd/m²316 cd/m² 321 cd/m²322 cd/m²306 cd/m² 297 cd/m²306 cd/m²311 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 322 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 309.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m² Brightness Distribution: 92 % Center on Battery: 322 cd/m² Contrast: 805:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²) ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 8.03 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77} ΔE Greyscale Calman: 8.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5} 84.9% sRGB (Calman 2D) Gamma: 1.99 CCT: 9252 K

| | Teclast T60 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 12" | Vale V12X
AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7" | Teclast Art Pad Pro
IPS, 2176x1600, 12.7" | | | ————————————————————————————————————————————————————— | —————————————– | —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— | ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– | | Screen | | 21% | 27% | 1% | | Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 322 | 393 22% | 453 41% | 291 -10% | | Brightness (cd/m²) | 309 | 381 23% | 438 42% | 269 -13% | | Brightness Distribution (%) | 92 | 93 1% | 94 2% | 82 -11% | | Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.4 | | 0.31 22% | 0.33 17% | | Contrast (:1) | 805 | | 1461 81% | 882 10% | | Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.03 | 6.5 19% | 6.87 14% | 7.79 3% | | Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.49 | 9.27 19% | 11.89 -3% | 10.97 5% | | Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.6 | 5 42% | 6.9 20% | 8 7% | | Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.215 99% | 2.216 99% | 2.007 110% | | CCT | 9252 70% | 7298 89% | 8458 77% | 8922 73% |

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness Teclast T60 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

325 cd/m²

Display / HDR Peak Brightness Teclast T60 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

326 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8077 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN Grayscale

CalMAN color accuracy

CalMAN color space

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White 27.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise ↘ 15.5 ms fall The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey 46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.1 ms rise ↘ 22.7 ms fall The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

With the MediaTek Helio G99 the tablet uses a typical SoC for the entry-level class. It offers enough power for simple everyday tasks, but is quickly overwhelmed by more complex tasks. Even in the menu, stutters cannot be completely ruled out.

The Teclast T60 Pro shows the usual performance values of the SoC and can convince with a constant performance even after prolonged load, as the 3DMark stress tests show. There is no noticeable warming of the casing after prolonged load.

The stereo speakers produce a decent sound for the price range, so you can listen to pop songs and other music. Those who are more demanding are more likely to use headphones or external speakers, which can be connected via USB or Bluetooth. Many Bluetooth audio codecs are supported, including Hi-Res audio.

8.000 mAh is rather low in terms of battery capacity; the competition sometimes offers significantly more. 11:55 hours in our Wi-Fi test is also a rather meagre runtime. Nevertheless, it is sufficient for a day on the sofa. However, charging takes quite a long time due to the low power of only 15 watts maximum.

Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core Average of class Tablet (185 - 4128, n=97, last 2 years)

1551 Points +112%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

742 Points +2%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

731 Points 0%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

730 Points

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (704 - 742, n=22)

725 Points -1%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

723 Points -1%

Multi-Core Average of class Tablet (848 - 16544, n=97, last 2 years)

4940 Points +149%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

2088 Points +5%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

2001 Points +1%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1984 Points 0%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1981 Points

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1784 - 2088, n=22)

1964 Points -1%

3DMark Wild Life Score Average of class Tablet (422 - 7134, n=52, last 2 years)

2124 Points +78%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1165 - 1364, n=27)

1226 Points +3%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1194 Points

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1180 Points -1%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1174 Points -2%

Wild Life Unlimited Score Average of class Tablet (421 - 32525, n=86, last 2 years)

8407 Points +676%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

1235 Points +14%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1011 - 1340, n=28)

1192 Points +10%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1166 Points +8%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1084 Points

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1057 Points -2%

Wild Life Extreme Average of class Tablet (89 - 9391, n=90, last 2 years)

2631 Points +647%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

352 Points

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (322 - 378, n=28)

344 Points -2%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

343 Points -3%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

341 Points -3%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

322 Points -9%

Wild Life Extreme Unlimited Average of class Tablet (99 - 11105, n=89, last 2 years)

2805 Points +704%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

358 Points +3%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

349 Points

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (323 - 366, n=28)

339 Points -3%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

338 Points -3%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

335 Points -4%

GFXBench on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen Average of class Tablet (5.2 - 122, n=94, last 2 years)

42 fps +278%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

25 fps +125%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8.2 - 44, n=28)

15.5 fps +40%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

11.1 fps

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

10 fps -10%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

8.3 fps -25%

1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 340, n=94, last 2 years)

104.2 fps +586%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

16 fps +5%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

16 fps +5%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (13.8 - 18, n=28)

15.6 fps +3%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

15.2 fps

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

13.8 fps -9%

on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 106.4, n=94, last 2 years)

30 fps +206%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

17 fps +73%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5.3 - 28, n=28)

10.2 fps +4%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

9.8 fps

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

6.5 fps -34%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

5.3 fps -46%

2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen Average of class Tablet (1.5 - 125, n=94, last 2 years)

39.8 fps +598%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

6 fps +5%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5.4 - 6.5, n=28)

5.85 fps +3%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

5.8 fps +2%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

5.7 fps 0%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

5.7 fps

3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen Average of class Tablet (0.64 - 55.1, n=94, last 2 years)

18.2 fps +658%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

2.5 fps +4%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

2.5 fps +4%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2.2 - 2.8, n=28)

2.48 fps +3%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

2.4 fps

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

2.3 fps -4%

Geekbench AI Single Precision NPU 1.5 Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=32, last 2 years)

654 Points +210%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

211 Points

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (209 - 211, n=2)

210 Points 0%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

Points -100%

Half Precision NPU 1.5 Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=32, last 2 years)

3062 Points +891%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (309 - 313, n=2)

311 Points +1%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

309 Points

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

Points -100%

Quantized NPU 1.5 Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=32, last 2 years)

4434 Points +2174%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (195 - 199, n=2)

197 Points +1%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

195 Points

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

Points -100%

CrossMark Overall Average of class Tablet (227 - 2155, n=57, last 2 years)

979 Points +73%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

586 Points +4%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

573 Points +1%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=15)

568 Points 0%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

566 Points

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

Points -100%

Productivity Average of class Tablet (243 - 2036, n=56, last 2 years)

965 Points +58%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

628 Points +3%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

612 Points

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (566 - 630, n=14)

610 Points 0%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

602 Points -2%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

Points -100%

Creativity Average of class Tablet (195 - 2620, n=56, last 2 years)

952 Points +76%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

542 Points

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

502 Points -7%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (454 - 560, n=14)

501 Points -8%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

488 Points -10%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

Points -100%

Responsiveness Average of class Tablet (289 - 12671, n=56, last 2 years)

1555 Points +165%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

673 Points +15%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

662 Points +13%

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (571 - 716, n=14)

658 Points +12%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

586 Points

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

Points -100%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score Average of class Tablet (23.3 - 395, n=69, last 2 years)

154.7 Points +79%

Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

91.223 Points +6%

Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

90.342 Points +5%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096

88.878 Points +3%

Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

86.4 Points

Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 92.8, n=16)

75.8 Points -12%

| | Teclast T60 Pro | Vale V12X | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | Teclast Art Pad Pro | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | | | ———————————————————————————————————————————–– | ——— | ————————————————————————————————————————————————————— | —————————————————————————————————————————————————– | —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–– | ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– | | AndroBench 3-5 | | 16% | -26% | 9% | -36% | 60% | | Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 879.6 | 994.2 13% | 925.1 5% | 1007.37 15% | 762 ?(427 - 1043, n=116)-13% | 1852 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=82, last 2 years)111% | | Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 754.4 | 914.9 21% | 395.6 -48% | 873.36 16% | 300 ?(13.6 - 754, n=116)-60% | 1399 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=82, last 2 years)85% | | Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 226.5 | 258.5 14% | 179.5 -21% | 237.46 5% | 154.7 ?(92.6 - 241, n=116)-32% | 253 ?(20.1 - 475, n=82, last 2 years)12% | | Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 219.5 | 257.1 17% | 129.9 -41% | 215.52 -2% | 131.1 ?(18.2 - 290, n=116)-40% | 288 ?(9.1 - 989, n=82, last 2 years)31% |

32.3 °C 90 F32.6 °C 91 F32.9 °C 91 F 33.1 °C 92 F33.2 °C 92 F33.4 °C 92 F 34.6 °C