You’ve spent weeks architecting the perfect backend for a client. The code is clean, the API is documented, and the tests are green. You hand it over, the client pays, and everyone is happy.

Six months later, you start a new project for a different client. You reach for that handy authentication utility library you wrote—the one you use on every project because it saves you ten hours of setup.

Stop.

If your previous contract wasn’t drafted carefully, you might have just sold the copyright to that utility library to your last client. Technically, using it again could get you sued for copyright infringement on code you wrote.

Intellectual Property (IP) clauses in software development services contracts are often the most glossed-over sections, yet they hold the most long-term risk for freelance developers. Here is how to navigate them without needing a law degree.

The Default Setting: Who Owns the Code?

In many jurisdictions, specifically under US copyright law, software written by a contractor is not automatically "work made for hire" unless there is a written agreement stating so and it falls into specific categories. However, clients almost always demand a contract that assigns all rights to them.

This is standard. If a client pays you $50,000 to build an app, they expect to own that app. They need to be able to sell it, modify it, or license it without asking your permission forever.

The danger isn’t in giving them the app; it’s in giving them everything else along with it.

The "Background Technology" Clause

This is your shield. As a developer, you likely have a toolkit of snippets, libraries, frameworks, and scripts that you reuse across projects. This is your "Background IP" or "Pre-existing Material."

If you sign a broad "Work Made for Hire" agreement that assigns "all results and proceeds" to the client, you are effectively selling your toolkit with the product.

The Fix: Ensure your contract distinguishes between Deliverables (the custom code unique to this project) and Background Technology (your reusable tools).

• Deliverables: Client owns 100% upon payment.
• Background Technology: You retain ownership, but you grant the client a non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free license to use it as part of the software.

Think of it this way: You are building them a house. You sell them the house (the Deliverables). You do not sell them the hammer and saw you used to build it (your Background IP).

The Golden Rule: IP Transfer Upon Full Payment

This is the single most powerful leverage point a freelancer has.

Sometimes projects go south. Scope creep sets in, communication breaks down, or the client simply runs out of money. If your contract states that IP transfers immediately upon creation, the client owns the code the moment you type it—even if they haven’t paid you a dime.

The Fix: Always include a clause stating that intellectual property rights transfer to the client only upon receipt of full payment.

This creates a simple dynamic:

• Client pays = Client owns code.
• Client doesn’t pay = You still own the code.

If a client ghosts you on the final invoice but launches the app, you can file a DMCA takedown notice because you are still the legal copyright holder. Usually, the threat of this is enough to get an invoice paid instantly.

Navigating the Open Source Minefield

Modern development is rarely writing code from scratch; it’s stitching together libraries. But open-source licenses (MIT, Apache, GPL) can conflict with proprietary contracts.

If you use a library with a "copyleft" license (like GPL) in a client’s proprietary application, you might legally force the client to open-source their entire codebase. Clients—especially enterprise ones—are terrified of this.

The Fix: Your contract should include a warranty that you have the right to include any third-party code. Conversely, you should protect yourself by listing major open-source components in your project documentation or proposal.

Tools like SwiftPropose allow you to clearly define the technical scope and stack in the initial proposal. By explicitly listing the frameworks (e.g., "We will build this on Laravel and Vue.js") right at the start, you set the expectation that third-party code is part of the deal, preventing legal headaches during the handover.

Defining "Moral Rights"

In some countries (particularly in Europe), creators have "moral rights"—the right to be identified as the author and the right to object to derogatory treatment of the work. These rights often cannot be sold, only waived.

US contracts often include a "Waiver of Moral Rights" clause. While usually fine for commercial software, be aware of what you are signing. If you want the right to display the work in your portfolio, make sure you carve out a specific license for Portfolio Use in the contract. Otherwise, a strict NDA might prevent you from ever showing off your best work.

Conclusion: Good Contracts Make Good Relationships

Discussing IP doesn’t have to be contentious. In fact, it makes you look like a professional who understands the industry.

1. Segregate your IP: Keep your reusable tools separate from client-specific code.
2. License, don’t sell: Grant licenses for your tools; sell the custom work.
3. Get paid first: Ownership transfers only when the bank account balance increases.

By setting these boundaries early—ideally in your initial proposal—you protect your business and give your clients clarity on what they are actually buying. It allows you to build a library of assets that makes you faster and more profitable with every new project, rather than starting from zero every single time.

---

Ready to win more clients? SwiftPropose helps freelancers create professional, AI-powered proposals in minutes. Stop losing deals to slow responses.

Try SwiftPropose Free | No credit card required.