Abstract:Understanding who shares academic publications on Twitter is critical to interpreting altmetrics as signals of scholarly or societal impact. Prior studies have used diverse and often incompatible user classification schemes, making synthesis difficult. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (covering 79,014 Twitter users, over 20 million tweets, and more than 5 million tweeted publications) to estimate category-specific engagement across three metrics: user counts, tweets, and tweeted publications. We developed a harmonized categorization scheme encompassing 11 user types and applied both Random Effects Models (REM) and Beta-Binomial Hierarchical Models (BBHM) to estimate proportion…
Abstract:Understanding who shares academic publications on Twitter is critical to interpreting altmetrics as signals of scholarly or societal impact. Prior studies have used diverse and often incompatible user classification schemes, making synthesis difficult. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (covering 79,014 Twitter users, over 20 million tweets, and more than 5 million tweeted publications) to estimate category-specific engagement across three metrics: user counts, tweets, and tweeted publications. We developed a harmonized categorization scheme encompassing 11 user types and applied both Random Effects Models (REM) and Beta-Binomial Hierarchical Models (BBHM) to estimate proportions, account for study-level variation, and model uncertainty. Across all indicators, individual users were the most active, comprising 66% of users, 55% of tweets, and 50% of tweeted publications. BBHM further enabled in-category vs. out-of-category comparisons and revealed engagement differences not detected by REM. T-tests on study-level means confirmed significant differences between academic individuals and other user types. Despite methodological heterogeneity, results consistently show that academic and non-academic individuals statistically equally dominate Twitter engagement with scholarly content. Our findings support the need for standardized user classification schemes and demonstrate the value of Bayesian modeling for synthesizing altmetric data in study variation and sparsity.
| Subjects: | Digital Libraries (cs.DL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2312.06399 [cs.DL] |
| (or arXiv:2312.06399v3 [cs.DL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.06399 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Ashraf Maleki [view email] [v1] Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:07:46 UTC (7,833 KB) [v2] Tue, 14 May 2024 16:50:59 UTC (8,144 KB) [v3] Sat, 6 Dec 2025 15:51:20 UTC (5,234 KB)