Abstract:Background and objective: Hybrid automated insulin delivery (hAID) systems represent the most advanced therapy for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Current systems rely on linear or linearized models of glucose homeostasis, which may compromise prediction accuracy and, in turn, timely decision-making by the controller. Physiological variability further complicates insulin requirements, underscoring the need for controllers that adapt dynamically and reduce user burden. Methods: We introduce the University of Bern (UniBE) hAID system, a framework based on successive linearization model predictive control (MPC). The controller integrates basal insulin infusion with the insu…
Abstract:Background and objective: Hybrid automated insulin delivery (hAID) systems represent the most advanced therapy for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Current systems rely on linear or linearized models of glucose homeostasis, which may compromise prediction accuracy and, in turn, timely decision-making by the controller. Physiological variability further complicates insulin requirements, underscoring the need for controllers that adapt dynamically and reduce user burden. Methods: We introduce the University of Bern (UniBE) hAID system, a framework based on successive linearization model predictive control (MPC). The controller integrates basal insulin infusion with the insulin bolus delivery module for meal-related and corrective bolus dosing, adapting bounds in real time to glucose dynamics while accounting for both automated and user-initiated inputs. In-silico evaluation was conducted using the commercial version of the FDA-accepted UVa/Padova metabolic simulator across nine scenarios involving persistent and time-varying errors in meal timing, carbohydrate estimation, and basal insulin profiles. Results: In the baseline scenario, UniBE achieved a mean time in range of 92.0+-13.2%, with time below range at 0.1+-0.2% and time above range at 7.9+-13.2%. Across perturbation scenarios, time in range remained between 75.1 and 92.8%, with low hypoglycemia incidence, demonstrating resilience to clinically relevant disturbances.
| Comments: | 12 pages, 3 Figures, and 5 Tables |
| Subjects: | Systems and Control (eess.SY) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2512.05827 [eess.SY] |
| (or arXiv:2512.05827v1 [eess.SY] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.05827 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Jose Garcia-Tirado [view email] [v1] Fri, 5 Dec 2025 15:45:01 UTC (319 KB)