Abstract:Research on the implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education often focuses on strategic goals, overlooking the hidden, and often politically charged, labour required to make it functional. This paper provides an insider’s account of the sociotechnical friction that arises when an institutional goal of empowering non-technical staff conflicts with the technical limitations of enterprise Large Language Models (LLMs). Through analytic autoethnography, this study examines a GenAI project pushed to an impasse, focusing on a workaround developed to navigate not only technical constraints but also the combined challenge of organisational territoriality and assertions of positional power. Drawing up…
Abstract:Research on the implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education often focuses on strategic goals, overlooking the hidden, and often politically charged, labour required to make it functional. This paper provides an insider’s account of the sociotechnical friction that arises when an institutional goal of empowering non-technical staff conflicts with the technical limitations of enterprise Large Language Models (LLMs). Through analytic autoethnography, this study examines a GenAI project pushed to an impasse, focusing on a workaround developed to navigate not only technical constraints but also the combined challenge of organisational territoriality and assertions of positional power. Drawing upon Alter’s (2014) theory of workarounds, the analysis interprets "articulation work" as a form of "invisible labour". By engaging with the Information Systems (IS) domains of user innovation and technology-in-practice, this study argues that such user-driven workarounds should be understood not as deviations, but as integral acts of sociotechnical integration. This integration, however, highlights the central paradoxes of modern GenAI where such workarounds for "unfinished" systems can simultaneously create unofficial "shadow" systems and obscure the crucial, yet invisible, sociotechnical labour involved. The findings suggest that the invisible labour required to integrate GenAI within complex organisational politics is an important, rather than peripheral, component of how it becomes functional in practice.
| Comments: | Preprint. Accepted for publication at the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS) 2025. The final peer-reviewed version is available at: this http URL |
| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) |
| ACM classes: | K.4.3; H.5.2; H.4.1; J.1 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2512.21055 [cs.CY] |
| (or arXiv:2512.21055v1 [cs.CY] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.21055 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) | |
| Journal reference: | Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS) 2025 |
Submission history
From: Shang Chieh Lee [view email] [v1] Wed, 24 Dec 2025 08:48:18 UTC (346 KB)