Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2601.04416 (cs)
Title:Transitive Expert Error and Routing Problems in Complex AI Systems
Abstract:Domain expertise enhances judgment within boundaries but creates systematic vulnerabilities specifically at borders. We term this Transitive Expert Error (TEE), distinct from Dunning-Kruger effects, requiring calibrated expertise as precondition. Mechanisms enabling reliable within-domain judgment become liabilities when structural similarity masks causal divergence. Two core mechanisms operate: structural similarity bias causes experts to overweight surface features (shared vocabulary, patterns, formal structure) while missing causal architecture differences; authority pers…
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2601.04416 (cs)
Title:Transitive Expert Error and Routing Problems in Complex AI Systems
Abstract:Domain expertise enhances judgment within boundaries but creates systematic vulnerabilities specifically at borders. We term this Transitive Expert Error (TEE), distinct from Dunning-Kruger effects, requiring calibrated expertise as precondition. Mechanisms enabling reliable within-domain judgment become liabilities when structural similarity masks causal divergence. Two core mechanisms operate: structural similarity bias causes experts to overweight surface features (shared vocabulary, patterns, formal structure) while missing causal architecture differences; authority persistence maintains confidence across competence boundaries through social reinforcement and metacognitive failures (experts experience no subjective uncertainty as pattern recognition operates smoothly on familiar-seeming inputs.) These mechanism intensify under three conditions: shared vocabulary masking divergent processes, social pressure for immediate judgment, and delayed feedback. These findings extend to AI routing architectures (MoE systems, multi-model orchestration, tool-using agents, RAG systems) exhibiting routing-induced failures (wrong specialist selected) and coverage-induced failures (no appropriate specialist exists). Both produce a hallucination phenotype: confident, coherent, structurally plausible but causally incorrect outputs at domain boundaries. In human systems where mechanisms are cognitive black boxes; AI architectures make them explicit and addressable. We propose interventions: multi-expert activation with disagreement detection (router level), boundary-aware calibration (specialist level), and coverage gap detection (training level). TEE has detectable signatures (routing patterns, confidence-accuracy dissociations, domain-inappropriate content) enabling monitoring and mitigation. What remains intractable in human cognition becomes addressable through architectural design.
| Comments: | 31pp |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2601.04416 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2601.04416v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.04416 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Forest Mars [view email] [v1] Wed, 7 Jan 2026 21:53:06 UTC (510 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.AI
Change to browse by:
export BibTeX citation