Key Takeaways

• Cyber risk management gets operationalized in 2026. Leading organizations move beyond visibility and frameworks to govern risk through prioritization, simulation, and deliberate action.
• Attack-path modeling matures into execution. Static views give way to dynamic, decision-driving models that help teams focus on the attack paths that matter most.
• CTEM gets realized and expanded through the Risk Operations Center (ROC). Continuous exposure management succeeds when it is operationalized through unified workflows, prioritization, and remediation.
• AI shifts security from noise to focus. Automation and agentic AI reduce signal overload, enabling faster and more confident decisions without compromising human accountability.
• Policy, insurance, and resilience converge. Regulators and insurers increasingly reward organizations that can clearly measure, communicate, and reduce risk.
• Transparency and threat hunting become maturity markers. Real-time disclosure and proactive, behavior-based hunting strengthen trust and provide continuous assurance.

The Signals Are Loud, the Dashboards Are Full, Yet Decisive Action Remains Elusive

By the end of 2025, many security leaders reached a quiet conclusion. The challenge was no longer a lack of tools, telemetry, or frameworks. Most enterprises already had all three. What remained unresolved was how reliably cyber risk could be translated into decisions that reduced exposure without slowing the business.

That realization defines 2026.

This is not a year shaped by dramatic new threat categories or sudden technical disruption. Instead, it marks a phase of operational maturation. Security organizations are beginning to treat cyber risk less as a condition to be observed and more as a system to be governed. Measurement improves. Communication becomes clearer. Elimination becomes more deliberate.

The predictions that follow reflect that shift. Together, they describe a year in which cybersecurity becomes more precise, more integrated with business decision-making, and more effective at producing measurable outcomes.

---

See what risk-first security looks like in 2026.

Qualys Insights

---

Prediction 1: AI and the Three T’s Create a Risk Management Inflection Point

Subject Matter Expert Prediction

*“CISOs in 2025 were faced with overwhelming noise: noise confronts the defender on three fronts. I call them the three T’s: Telemetry, Tools, Technology. Telemetry means the signals emitted by security tools; tools refer to the abundance of security solutions we have deployed or are considering; and technology signifies what our businesses are doing in terms of digital and AI transformation. It’s overwhelming. *

*Add to that the rapid pace of AI growth, both from a consumer and a B2B perspective. People are using AI for everything without your permission, including crafting core enterprise content or getting overzealous AI help with first-party development. This is the exponentiation of high-risk shadow IT brought to you by consumer-facing AI. *

*Then there are the corporate AI initiatives that mesh on-premises stuff with SaaS via the “Model Control Protocol” (MCP). That, in turn, is theoretically taking autonomous actions in concert with other agents. *

Leaders no longer want mere observation.* *They wish to know how assets, risks, threats, and business value correlate and interact. And where the biggest bang for their buck exists in eliminating risk across various attack paths. More than that, they want non-destructive action taken to eradicate high-impact risks. ”

– Rich Seiersen, Chief Risk Technology Officer, Qualys

Why It Matters

The defining challenge here is not AI adoption, but prioritization at scale. In 2026, security teams are expected to move beyond alert accumulation toward correlation and action. Automation and AI increasingly reduce friction, de-duplicate signals, and surface what truly requires intervention.

The outcome is greater operational focus. Risk reduction becomes measurable. Remediation becomes targeted. Security teams spend less time interpreting noise and more time executing decisions that reduce exposure.

Prediction 2: Federal Cyber Policy in 2026 Centers on Resilience and National Readiness

Subject Matter Expert prediction

“Despite polarization in other domains, cybersecurity remains one of the few policy arenas with strong bipartisan alignment, especially around nation-state threats and the crucial need for more robust national resilience. That consensus will continue to anchor and drive 2026 federal cyber policy. At the same time, the government pulling back from sustained open dialogue creates a vacuum: so private-sector leaders and academia will have greater influence over priorities, norms, standards, and best practices than before. Evergreen needs like rapid incident reporting, info sharing, and system modernization will remain constant: new to the scene will be the convergence of AI, quantum, and cyber policies within legislation, and each becoming more intertwined within both national security and economic competition.”

– April Lenhard, Principal Product Manager, Cyber Threat Intelligence, Qualys

Why It Matters

Cybersecurity policy in 2026 is less about reactive mandates and more about structural resilience. As AI, quantum readiness, and cyber risk converge in legislation, organizations are expected to demonstrate preparedness, not just compliance.

For enterprises, this reinforces a familiar requirement. Risk must be measurable, explainable, and defensible to regulators, partners, and boards. Organizations that already treat cyber risk as an operating discipline are better positioned to adapt without disruption.

Prediction 3: AI Accelerates Threat Hunting; Strategy Remains a Human Mandate

**Subject Matter Expert **prediction

“Automation is already a requirement, and yes, AI is the only way to keep up. It will augment them by handling the high-speed work. The AI agents will be the engine that sifts through numerous threats, automatically flagging the catastrophic ones and keeping humans in the loop. In addition, the human hunter, freed from this, can focus on systemic risk and strategy. The AI agents find the needle in the haystack; the human hunter decides what to do with the needle, the haystack, and the entire farm.”

– Saeed Abbasi, Senior Manager for Security Research, Qualys Threat Research Unit (TRU)

Why It Matters

At enterprise scale, threat hunting cannot rely on manual analysis alone. In 2026, AI increasingly handles volume, speed, and pattern matching, while human hunters retain ownership of judgment, trade-offs, and long-term risk strategy.

This division of labor improves consistency and focus. Automation accelerates detection and prioritization, while human expertise ensures that response decisions remain aligned with business context and operational intent.

Prediction 4: Attack-Path Modeling Grows Up, and Risk-Prioritized Operations Take Hold

Subject Matter Expert Prediction

“2026 is the year attack-path modeling grows up, and the year CTEM gets sidelined by the Risk Operations Center (ROC). Attack paths will transition from static graphs to digital cyber ranges, powering redteaming and real-time “what-if” or “now-what” simulations. Wargaming has ignored the cyber element for a long time, so cybersecurity will instead start incorporating wargame elements at a bigger scale. Secondly, we will start seeing a wider industry shift from counting assets to risk-prioritized operations, where informed triage eliminates noise, saves resources, and focuses teams on what actually matters when it matters.”

– April Lenhard, Principal Product Manager, Cyber Threat Intelligence, Qualys

Why It Matters

For years, attack-path analysis offered theoretical clarity but limited operational value. In 2026, its role changes. Organizations begin using attack paths as living models that show how risk actually moves across identities, infrastructure, applications, and cloud services.

This evolution does not disregard CTEM. It operationalizes it. The ROC becomes the execution layer where exposure management, prioritization, and remediation converge. The result is faster alignment on what to fix, fewer debates over severity, and clearer accountability for reducing risk across real attack paths.

Prediction 5: Cyber Insurance Becomes a Strategic Risk-Financing Lever

Subject Matter Expert prediction

*“Cyber insurance moves in cycles, swinging between soft and hard markets. In a soft market — where we are today — coverage is relatively inexpensive, capacity is abundant, and insurers compete aggressively for business. High levels of available capital reinforce this competitive dynamic, keeping premiums lower than many expected even after recent loss activity. *

*Looking toward 2026, most analysts anticipate moderate hardening: gradual premium increases, more selective underwriting, and closer attention to security controls. But it’s unlikely we’ll return to the severity of past hard markets, when applicants faced exhaustive questionnaires and lengthy underwriting delays. *

*A major wildcard is the possibility of a systemic cyber event — a cloud outage, widespread supply-chain compromise, or high-impact ransomware wave that hits many insureds at the same time. Such an event could push the market into a sharper hardening cycle. Still, it’s important to recognize that insurance pricing is shaped just as much by macroeconomic factors, such as interest rates, capital flows, and reinsurance pricing, as by cyber-specific incidents. Losses matter, but broader financial conditions often dominate the cycle. *

*This environment also influences how CISOs should think about cyber insurance as part of a coordinated risk-management strategy. Increasingly, CISOs are partnering with CFOs to treat cyber insurance not as a compliance checkbox but as one component of a broader risk-financing portfolio. With many organizations undergoing rapid digital and AI-driven transformation, this may be an ideal time to reassess the balance between risk transfer (insurance) and risk reduction (controls). *

There is meaningful opportunity here for forward-looking companies:

• *Firms with strong security postures can often secure more favorable coverage and larger limits without dramatically increasing cost. *

• *Brokers and underwriters are actively looking for ways to differentiate good risks from poor ones, and software platforms that provide clearer visibility into controls and exposure can help insurers deploy capital more efficiently without damaging their loss ratios. *

• *For buyers, this creates room to increase coverage economically during a softening cycle, while simultaneously improving resilience. *

The challenge, of course, is that today’s soft market means buyers have low tolerance for friction. Any security-oriented underwriting tools must be lightweight, fast, and aligned with the realities of the purchasing process. But as the market gradually tightens, organizations that invest early in transparency and measurable security posture may find themselves with more options, and leverage, when seeking coverage in 2026 and beyond.”

– Rich Seiersen, Chief Risk Technology Officer, Qualys

Why It Matters

As underwriting expectations mature, clarity becomes an advantage. Organizations that can demonstrate how risk is measured and reduced will gain leverage with insurers and internal stakeholders alike.

In 2026, cyber insurance increasingly rewards discipline. The strongest outcomes emerge where security, finance, and operations share a common understanding of risk and progress.

Prediction 6: Radical Transparency Becomes a Trust-Building Control

Subject Matter Expert Prediction

“Radical transparency is one bold move I think more companies should make in risk management in 2026—even if it feels uncomfortable. Radically transparent incident disclosure, in near real time.

*Most companies still treat breaches like PR crises to contain. The bold move? Flip that entirely. *

*When you detect anomalous activity, tell your customers ASAP, even before you fully understand scope. Create a live status page, issue daily updates, publish indicators of attack and indicators of compromise as you find them. Admit uncertainty openly. *

This feels uncomfortable because it exposes your vulnerabilities and invites scrutiny during your most chaotic moments. But it builds trust in ways that carefully crafted post-incident reports never will. Your customers and partners can start their own threat hunting to keep themselves safe even if your platform is exposed, allowing you to enlist support from customers and government agencies. And when regulators inevitably show up, they see an organization that prioritizes protection over perception.

The companies already doing this aren’t experiencing the reputational death spiral everyone fears. They’re building loyalty. Transparency gains trust.”

– Alex Kreilein, Vice President, Product Security & Public Sector Solutions, Qualys

Why It Matters

Transparency in 2026 is less about messaging and more about coordination. Early, factual disclosure enables customers, partners, and regulators to act in parallel.

Handled well, transparency shortens response cycles, strengthens trust, and aligns incident management with long-term resilience rather than short-term perception management.

Prediction 7: Proactive Threat Hunting Becomes a Permanent Security Requirement

Subject Matter Expert prediction

*“In 2026, we exepct proactive threat hunting to become the dominant model. Our research argues that it’s the only way forward. Proactive hunting isn’t about finding a threat “never seen before.” It’s about hunting for the behaviors and patterns that attackers reuse. As we discussed in ROCon Houston last month, attackers don’t innovate; they iterate. They find a weak product or a complex technology and brutally exploit that entire class of software until it becomes an industry-level liability. *

Proactive threat hunting improves by shifting focus from abstract scores to real-world, adversary-centric context. Better hunting comes from better prioritization. Prioritize by interrogating attacker telemetry: is it weaponized? Is it tied to ransomware? What’s its sighting count? Is there dark web chatter? Is this a recurring target?”

– Saeed Abbasi, Senior Manager, Security Research, Qualys Threat Research Unit (TRU)

Why It Matters

Threat hunting in 2026 becomes a standing capability rather than a periodic exercise. By focusing on behavior, validation, and recurrence, teams improve their ability to manage long-lived exposure.

The result is steadier assurance. Risk is constrained through continuous prioritization and validation, not episodic response.

The Throughline for 2026

Across all these predictions, a consistent theme emerges. Cybersecurity is becoming more operational and proactive, not more reactive.

Organizations that succeed in 2026 will be those that:

• Measure risk consistently
• Communicate it clearly across technical and executive audiences
• Eliminate it deliberately through prioritized, validated action

Security does not need to be louder or more dramatic to be effective. In 2026, it becomes more composed, more disciplined, and more closely aligned with how the business runs.

---

To dig deeper into these predictions and more, join us on February 4, 2026, for a live webinar: Cybersecurity Predictions for 2026: Embracing the Risk-First Era.

---