We’re taking part in Copyright Week, a series of actions and discussions supporting key principles that should guide copyright policy. Every day this week, various groups are taking on different elements of copyright law and policy, and addressing what’s at stake, and what we need to do to make sure that copyright promotes creativity and innovation.
There’s a crisis of creativity in mainstream American culture. We have fewer and fewer studios and record labels *and *fewer and fewer platforms online that serve independent artists and creators.
At its core, copyright is a monopoly right on creative output and expression. It’s intended to allow people who make things to make a living through those things, to incentivize creativity. To square the …
We’re taking part in Copyright Week, a series of actions and discussions supporting key principles that should guide copyright policy. Every day this week, various groups are taking on different elements of copyright law and policy, and addressing what’s at stake, and what we need to do to make sure that copyright promotes creativity and innovation.
There’s a crisis of creativity in mainstream American culture. We have fewer and fewer studios and record labels *and *fewer and fewer platforms online that serve independent artists and creators.
At its core, copyright is a monopoly right on creative output and expression. It’s intended to allow people who make things to make a living through those things, to incentivize creativity. To square the circle that is “exclusive control over expression” and “free speech,” we have fair use.
However, we aren’t just seeing artists having a time-limited ability to make money off of their creations. We are also seeing large corporations turn into megacorporations and consolidating huge stores of copyrights under one umbrella. When the monopoly right granted by copyright is compounded by the speed and scale of media company mergers, we end up with a crisis in creativity.
People have been complaining about the lack of originality in Hollywood for a long time. What is interesting is that the response from the major studios has rarely, especially recently, to invest in original programming. Instead, they have increased their copyright holdings through mergers and acquisitions. In today’s consolidated media world, copyright is doing the opposite of its intended purpose: instead of encouraging creativity, it’s discouraging it. The drive to snap up media franchises (or “intellectual properties”) that can generate sequels, reboots, spinoffs, and series for years to come has crowded out truly original and fresh creativity in many sectors.And since copyright terms last so long, there isn’t even a ticking clock to force these corporations to seek out new original creations.
In theory, the internet should provide a counterweight to this problem by lowering barriers to entry for independent creators. But as online platforms for creativity likewise shrink in number and grow in scale, they have closed ranks with the major studios.
It’s a betrayal of the promise of the internet: that it should be a level playing field where you get to decide what you want to do, watch, listen to, read. And our government should be ashamed for letting it happen.