How We See Emergence

Right now, you’re performing an impossible feat. These white marks on a glowing screen—arbitrary squiggles, really—are triggering thoughts in your mind. Not just any thoughts, but specific ideas, transmitted across space and time through symbols that represent sounds that represent concepts that represent reality itself.

This is abstraction in action. And it’s not just a human trick—it’s the universe’s fundamental method for making infinite complexity comprehensible, for transforming the particular into the universal, for turning the chaos of raw existence into patterns that can be recognized, remembered, and used.

Without abstraction, we’d drown in an ocean of specifics. We’d see individual birds but never flocks, individual molecules but never phase transitions, individual transactions but never economies. Abstraction is the art of strategic forgetting—the ability to discard what doesn’t matter so you can see what does.

When a physicist writes F = ma, they’re not describing any particular force on any particular mass. They’ve abstracted away the color of the object, its texture and temperature, the exact atoms it’s made of, whether it’s happening on Earth or Mars. What remains is the pattern—the universal relationship that works for everything, everywhere, always.

This is the paradox: abstraction makes things more useful by making them less specific. Whether abstractions are “more real” than particulars is philosophically debated (Platonists say yes, nominalists say no), but their functional power is undeniable.

You’ve never seen “cat”—you’ve only seen particular cat. Cash, Garfield, that one judging you with its stare. Yet “cat” is functionally more powerful than any individual cat because it captures the pattern that applies to all cats. The abstraction is less detailed but enables broader application.

Before Humans: Abstraction in Nature

This pattern compression predates minds.

Consider the difference between a map and a photograph. When you photograph a landscape, you capture every detail your camera can see—trees, rocks, clouds, shadows. But when you make a map of that same landscape, you deliberately discard most details. You keep elevation contours, trail paths, water sources. You’ve chosen what matters for navigation.

That’s cognitive abstraction—intentional selection based on purpose.

Now consider how a river shapes a landscape. As water flows, it doesn’t “choose” to ignore the chemical composition of rocks or their color. It simply responds to gravity and resistance. Yet the result looks remarkably like abstraction—the river reveals the landscape’s underlying structure, the pattern of slopes and weaknesses, while “discarding” details that don’t affect water flow.

The river doesn’t have intent, but it performs something functionally similar to abstraction: it responds to some properties while remaining unaffected by others, thereby revealing patterns. Throughout nature, we find physical processes that compress information, respond selectively, and reveal underlying structures—all without conscious intent.

Physical systems exhibit pattern-revealing compression long before minds arrive to deliberately abstract.

DNA: Biology’s Compression Algorithm

DNA doesn’t store a complete blueprint of you. It stores compressed instructions—encoding how to build proteins, when to activate genes, how to respond to environments. The same HOX genes that pattern a fruit fly’s body segments also pattern yours. Evolution discovered a compression scheme—”body segment organization”—that works across hundreds of millions of years and countless species.

DNA functions as an information layer between chemistry and biology. It encodes the pattern that matters rather than specifying every molecular detail.

Gravity: Physics’ Selective Interaction

Gravity doesn’t care about what things are made of, their color, temperature, or age, whether they’re solid, liquid, or gas. It interacts based solely on mass and distance. F = Gm₁m₂/r² (Newton’s formulation, later refined by Einstein’s spacetime curvature).

This selective interaction is what makes gravity universal. By responding only to mass and distance, gravity operates identically for quarks and galaxies, atoms and stars, you and the Earth beneath your feet.

Phase Transitions: Nature’s Pattern Compression

Temperature, pressure, phase—these don’t exist in individual molecules. They’re patterns that emerge when you look at many molecules together. Yet they’re causally powerful. “Temperature” can break rocks, shape climates, end civilizations.

Physical systems exhibit pattern compression long before minds arrive to notice it.

The Ladder of Abstraction

Reality is structured in layers, each one abstracting the one below:

Quarks → Protons (abstracting quantum chaos to “positive charge”) Protons + Neutrons → Atoms (abstracting nuclear forces to “chemical elements”) Atoms → Molecules (abstracting electronic structure to “bonds”) Molecules → Cells (abstracting chemistry to “metabolism”) Cells → Organisms (abstracting cellular machinery to “life”) Organisms → Ecosystems (abstracting individual survival to “energy flow”) Individuals → Societies (abstracting personal choices to “culture”)

At each level, you lose detail but gain explanatory power—the ability to predict and manipulate reality at that scale. You can’t predict the stock market by modeling every electron in every trader’s brain—but you can predict it by abstracting to “supply and demand.”

This is why different sciences study different levels. Physics handles particles and forces. Chemistry handles molecular abstractions. Biology handles living abstractions. Each level has its own laws because each level is its own abstraction layer. The “laws” at each level are the patterns that remain when you abstract away lower-level details.

As physicist Philip W. Anderson argued, “The ability to reduce everything to simple fundamental laws does not imply the ability to start from those laws and reconstruct the universe.” Each level of complexity requires its own language, its own laws, its own way of seeing.

How Consciousness Became an Abstraction Machine

Consciousness gave the universe a new power: deliberate abstraction.

Before consciousness, the universe abstracted through physical processes—DNA encoding patterns, crystals forming structures, gravity organizing matter. But consciousness can intentionally abstract, test abstractions, and communicate them.

Language: Abstraction Made Transmissible

Every word is an abstraction. “Tree” groups billions of different organisms. “Love” encompasses infinite feelings. “Justice” captures countless situations. “Five” applies to any collection of things.

When you say “tree,” I don’t see your specific memory of a specific tree. The word triggers my abstraction of tree-ness, built from my own experiences. Yet we understand each other. Language is humanity’s killer app precisely because it transmits abstractions.

Mathematics: Pure Pattern

Mathematics is what happens when you abstract abstraction itself. Numbers don’t exist—you’ve never seen “three,” only three apples, three people, three atoms. But “three” as a concept is real enough to build bridges, launch rockets, and encrypt your credit card.

Mathematics discovered that you could abstract away everything—color, shape, substance, meaning—and operate on pure pattern. The number 7 works the same whether it’s 7 sheep, 7 galaxies, or 7 abstract concepts.

This is why mathematics is “unreasonably effective” in describing reality: it’s the most compressed abstraction possible.

Science: Systematic Abstraction Testing

Science is humanity’s method for discovering which abstractions actually map to reality. Every scientific law is an abstraction that works—it successfully compresses observed complexity into a pattern that predicts future observations.

When Einstein abstracted gravity from “force” to “spacetime curvature,” he wasn’t just changing words—he was finding a deeper pattern that explained more phenomena with fewer assumptions. Better abstraction equals deeper truth.

Matter Without Mass: Social Abstractions as Forces

The most powerful forces shaping your daily life aren’t made of atoms at all. Money, laws, corporations, languages—none have mass or occupy physical space, yet they behave in ways strikingly analogous to matter.

Consider how a corporation behaves in ways similar to a physical organism. It grows or shrinks in response to resources. It merges or splits like cells dividing. It decays when conditions aren’t favorable. It competes for market territory. It adapts through selective pressure. The analogy isn’t perfect but the functional similarities are instructive.

Yet a corporation exists purely as abstraction—a pattern of relationships and agreements. You can’t point to any collection of atoms and say “that’s Microsoft.” You can’t weigh Apple or measure Amazon’s volume. These abstract entities move millions of tons of matter across the planet without being matter themselves.

Even more striking: these social abstractions follow dynamics remarkably similar to physical systems. Companies compete for limited market share within a given market, creating zero-sum dynamics in constrained spaces. Societies undergo phase transitions like matter does—the shift from feudalism to capitalism involved sudden reorganization at critical thresholds, like water turning to steam. Cultural norms create influence fields affecting behavior in ways analogous to how magnetic fields influence particles.

How the Four Pillars Work Together

Abstraction doesn’t operate alone. It’s one of four fundamental processes that work together to create and understand reality:

Emergence creates new properties at higher levels—consciousness from neurons, markets from trades, life from chemistry.

Abstraction identifies the patterns in what emerged—we compress neuronal activity to “thought,” market behavior to “price,” chemical complexity to “metabolism.”

Constraint determines which abstractions are useful—physical laws constrain which patterns matter, evolutionary pressure constrains which traits succeed, logical rules constrain which concepts cohere.

Time allows abstractions to evolve—scientific theories improve over centuries, languages drift across generations, mathematical concepts build on previous discoveries.

They create each other in an ongoing loop:

1. Emergence creates new properties at higher levels (consciousness from neurons, markets from trades)
2. Abstraction recognizes the patterns in what emerged (“thought,” “price”)—without abstraction, emergence would be invisible to us
3. These abstractions enable new forms of emergence (language enables civilization, mathematics enables technology)
4. Constraints shape which emergences and abstractions survive and propagate
5. Time allows the cycle to compound, each generation building on the last
6. Round and round, each cycle creating more complexity

Your brain is doing this right now. Photons hit your retina (physics). Neurons fire patterns (biology). Letters are recognized through abstraction (perception). Words trigger concepts through more abstraction (language). Ideas form in your mind through emergence (thought). Understanding happens as abstraction recognizes emergence.

You’re not reading ink—you’re using abstractions (letters, words, concepts) to recognize emergent meaning. Without abstraction, you couldn’t perceive emergence at all. The two are inseparable partners in how we comprehend reality.

When Abstraction Misleads: The Wisdom of Knowing

But abstraction’s power comes with a profound limitation: every abstraction is also a distortion.

The map is not the territory. And sometimes, the map leads us astray.

The Danger of Over-Abstraction

When you reduce a person to their job title, you’ve lost their complexity. When you reduce a forest to “timber,” you miss the ecosystem. When you reduce consciousness to “neural activity,” you might be missing something essential. When you reduce a human being to their credit score, you’ve erased their story.

History is littered with abstractions that seemed useful but caused harm:

Phlogiston(An obsolete theory explaining combustion and rusting.) seemed to explain combustion—until it didn’t. Scientists spent decades working with a wrong abstraction of fire.

Luminiferous aether(A hypothetical medium for light propagation) seemed necessary for light propagation—until Einstein showed space itself could curve. The abstraction was blocking deeper insight.

Race and caste categories abstracted human diversity into discrete boxes—causing centuries of suffering because the abstraction was confused with reality.

GDP abstracts economic activity to a single number—but misses environmental destruction, inequality, and human wellbeing.

IQ scores abstract intelligence to a number—but miss creativity, wisdom, emotional intelligence, and practical skills.

The abstractions we choose shape what we see, what we value, and what we miss. As Kenneth Boulding said, “The image which an individual has of himself is a peculiar product of the messages which he has received in the past.” Our abstractions become our reality.

The Wisdom of Selective Concreteness

This is why we need art, poetry, music—they resist abstraction. They insist on the particular, the specific, the irreducible experience that can’t be compressed into concepts.

The wisdom is knowing when to abstract and when to stay with the concrete. Here are some guideposts:

Abstract when you need to:

• Communicate patterns across contexts
• Predict outcomes based on past patterns
• Scale understanding to larger systems
• Make decisions affecting many cases
• Build general tools others can use

Resist abstraction when:

• The particular IS the meaning (this grief, this sunset, this person)
• Abstraction has historically caused harm (reducing humans to categories)
• Details contain essential information (medical diagnosis, legal cases)
• You’re experiencing rather than analyzing (art, intimacy, presence)
• The complexity itself matters (ecosystems, consciousness, culture)

A great doctor abstracts symptoms to diagnoses—but also sees the particular human before them. A great teacher abstracts learning principles—but responds to each student’s unique needs. A great leader abstracts strategy—but remembers that every decision affects real people.

Wisdom is the art of moving between abstraction and concreteness—using each when appropriate, never confusing the map for the territory, always remembering what you’ve chosen to forget.

Failed Abstractions as Learning

Interestingly, wrong abstractions often teach us more than correct ones. When phlogiston failed, we discovered oxygen. When aether failed, we discovered relativity. When Newtonian mechanics failed at quantum scales, we discovered a deeper reality.

Each failed abstraction revealed its own limitations—teaching us that all abstractions are provisional tools, not eternal truths. They work within certain domains, at certain scales, under certain conditions. The ability to distinguish useful abstractions from misleading ones is crucial.

The process of testing abstractions against emergent reality is how science progresses. We propose patterns, test them, refine them when they fail, and occasionally discover that we need fundamentally different patterns to capture what’s actually happening.

Abstraction as Emergent Tool

Like emergence itself, some abstractions become tools that enable further creation:

The Alphabet: Abstracted sounds into symbols → enabled literacy → enabled civilization

Zero: Abstracted “nothing” into a number → enabled mathematics → enabled computation → enabled digital revolution

The Scientific Method: Abstracted “how to know things” → enabled systematic discovery → enabled technology

Money: Abstracted value into fungible tokens → enabled complex economies → enabled specialization → enabled modern society

Code: Abstracted instructions into executable symbols → enabled software → enabled AI

The most powerful abstractions don’t just describe reality—they become tools for creating new realities. Abstraction might be the most powerful emergent tool of all. Through it, the universe gained the ability to recognize its own patterns and consciously direct its evolution.

Abstraction itself is an emergent property—it arises from the complexity of conscious minds—that becomes a tool enabling further emergence. It’s recursive: abstraction can improve itself through meta-abstraction, creating ever more powerful ways to compress and manipulate reality.

You Are an Abstraction Machine

You are an abstraction machine. Every moment, you’re pattern-matching, categorizing, predicting, compressing, and communicating. This isn’t just useful—it’s how consciousness works.

You don’t store every detail of every experience. You abstract the essence, store the pattern, discard the rest. When you remember “last summer or that party” you’re not replaying it frame-by-frame. You’re accessing an abstraction—compressed highlights, key feelings, essential meaning.

Every time you say “the economy is growing” instead of tracking billions of individual transactions, you’re performing abstraction. When you feel “the room got tense” without measuring anyone’s cortisol levels, you’re perceiving emergence through abstraction. You’re already a master of the very skill that allowed the universe to understand itself.

The Meta-Pattern

Here’s the recursive twist: this essay is an abstraction about abstraction.

I’m not describing every instance of abstraction that ever occurred. I’m finding the pattern, showing examples, hoping you’ll recognize the concept and apply it to new situations.

And if this works—if you now see abstraction operating everywhere you look—then you’ve just experienced abstraction succeeding. You’ve compressed all these words into a concept you can use. That concept is itself an emergent tool that will change how you think, what you notice, what becomes possible for you to understand and create.

Seeing Through New Eyes

Once you understand abstraction, the world transforms.

You’ll see that every word is a gift—someone abstracted experience so you could recognize it.

You’ll see that every scientific law is a miracle—the universe’s complexity compressed into patterns we can hold in our minds.

You’ll see that every technology is built on abstractions—layer upon layer of patterns that let us manipulate reality through symbols.

You’ll see that consciousness itself is the universe’s most sophisticated abstraction tool—the capacity to recognize patterns, name them, and use them to create new patterns.

Most profoundly, you’ll see that you’re not separate from this process. Every time you understand something, you’re participating in the universe abstracting itself, making itself comprehensible to itself through you.

But you’ll also see the danger—how abstractions can mislead, how maps can be confused with territories, how wisdom lies in knowing when to abstract and when to honor the irreducible particular.

The Invitation

The universe has spent 13.8 billion years learning how to see itself through abstraction. In you, it’s gotten remarkably good at it.

But here’s what makes this moment extraordinary: you’re not just abstracting unconsciously, like DNA encoding patterns or gravity organizing matter. You’re aware that you’re abstracting. You can choose which patterns to see and which to ignore. You can recognize when your abstractions fail and build better ones.

Every abstraction you create ripples outward. When you compress a complex insight into simple words, you give others a tool to see what you’ve seen. When you choose not to abstract—when you sit with someone’s unique grief rather than categorizing it, when you experience this sunset without comparing it to others—you’re preserving what makes existence meaningful rather than merely comprehensible.

The deepest wisdom isn’t choosing abstraction over particularity, or particularity over abstraction. It’s developing the discernment to know which lens each moment demands.

You are the universe’s way of holding both the map and the territory, the pattern and the particular—and knowing which one each moment needs.

What patterns will you abstract today? What will you choose to see clearly by strategic forgetting?

And just as importantly: What will you refuse to reduce? What complexity will you preserve because some things should remain as intricate as they are?

The universe spent billions of years learning to abstract. In you, it’s learning something even more sophisticated: when not to.

— Sail

Subscribe to my newsletter!