Pandas vs Polars: Why the 2025 Evolution Changes Everything

The Python data ecosystem, in late 2025, continues its rapid evolution, driven by an insatiable demand for performance and scalability. For years, pandas has been the ubiquitous workhorse, foundational to countless analytical pipelines. However, the past two years have seen the meteoric rise and significant maturation of polars, a Rust-backed DataFrame library that fundamentally challenges pandas’s traditional approach. As developers, we’ve moved beyond the "which is better" debate, now focusing on "when to use what" and, critically, "how these libraries are converging and diverging" in their latest iterations. This analysis dives deep into the recent developments, architectural shifts, and practical implications for senior developers navigating the Python data stack.

…

Polars’ Continued Ascent: A Deep Dive into Query Optimization

Polars has cemented its reputation as a performance powerhouse, largely due to its sophisticated query optimizer and lazy execution model. Unlike pandas’s eager execution, where each operation runs immediately, Polars constructs a logical plan of the entire computation before execution, allowing for significant optimization. This approach is not merely about deferring computation; it’s about intelligent reordering and simplification of operations.

At its core, Polars leverages a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) to represent the sequence of transformations. When a LazyFrame is created (e.g., via pl.scan_csv(), which implicitly uses lazy evaluation, or by calling .lazy() on an eager DataFrame), Polars builds this DAG. Operations like filter(), select(), and with_columns() add nodes to this graph. The magic happens when .collect() is invoked, triggering the optimizer.

The optimizer employs several key techniques:

Predicate Pushdown: Filters are applied as early as possible, ideally at the data source itself. This drastically reduces the amount of data processed downstream, saving both memory and CPU cycles. For instance, if you’re reading a large Parquet file and immediately filtering by a column, Polars will attempt to push that filter down to the Parquet reader, only loading relevant rows.
Projection Pushdown: Only the columns required for the final result are loaded and processed. If a pipeline involves many columns but the final select() only needs a few, Polars avoids loading or computing on the unnecessary columns.
Common Subplan Elimination: Identical sub-expressions within a query plan are identified and computed only once, reusing the result.
Expression Simplification: Redundant operations are removed or simplified (e.g., pl.col("foo") * 1 becomes pl.col("foo")).

This architecture is particularly evident when inspecting a LazyFrame’s execution plan using .explain(). For instance, a seemingly complex chain of filters and aggregations will often reveal an optimized plan where filters are moved to the initial scan, and intermediate aggregations are combined.

import polars as pl
import os

# Assume 'large_data.csv' exists with columns 'id', 'category', 'value', 'timestamp'

# Example of a LazyFrame with predicate and projection pushdown potential
lf = (
pl.scan_csv("large_data.csv")
.filter(pl.col("timestamp").is_between(pl.datetime(2025, 1, 1), pl.datetime(2025, 12, 31)))
.group_by("category")
.agg(
pl.col("value").mean().alias("avg_value"),
pl.col("id").n_unique().alias("unique_ids")
)
.filter(pl.col("avg_value") > 100)
.select(["category", "avg_value"])
)

print(lf.explain())

The .explain() output serves as a crucial debugging and performance tuning tool, offering a textual representation of the optimized logical plan. For visual learners, Polars also offers show_graph() (if graphviz is installed), which renders the DAG, making the optimizations tangible.

Pandas’ Evolution: Copy-on-Write (CoW) and Memory Semantics

While Polars was built from the ground up with performance primitives, pandas has been systematically addressing its own architectural limitations. A standout development in recent pandas iterations (starting with 2.0 and refined in subsequent 2.x releases) is the significant push towards Copy-on-Write (CoW) semantics. This change is a direct response to pandas’s historical "SettingWithCopyWarning" and often unpredictable memory behavior, particularly when chained assignments led to unintended data mutation or costly eager copies.

Before CoW, pandas often made implicit copies of DataFrames or Series during operations, leading to higher memory consumption and non-deterministic performance. Modifying a "view" of a DataFrame might or might not modify the original, depending on internal heuristics, making code hard to reason about. With CoW enabled (often via pd.set_option("mode.copy_on_write", True)), pandas aims for more predictable behavior: data is only copied when it is actually modified.

The architectural implication is a shift from mutable views to immutable data blocks that are shared until a write operation occurs. When a user performs an operation that would modify a shared block, a copy of only the affected block is made, leaving the original shared data untouched. This reduces unnecessary copies, improving memory efficiency and often performance, especially in scenarios involving multiple intermediate operations that don’t ultimately modify the original data.

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Enable Copy-on-Write (recommended for recent pandas versions)
pd.set_option("mode.copy_on_write", True)

df = pd.DataFrame({'A': range(1_000_000), 'B': np.random.rand(1_000_000)})
df_view = df[df['A'] > 500_000] # This creates a logical view

# With CoW, 'df_view' shares memory with 'df' initially.
print(f"Memory usage of df_view before modification: {df_view.memory_usage(deep=True).sum() / (1024**2):.2f} MB")

# Now, modify a column in df_view
df_view['B'] = df_view['B'] * 10

# With CoW, only now is the 'B' column data for df_view copied.
print(f"Memory usage of df_view after modification: {df_view.memory_usage(deep=True).sum() / (1024**2):.2f} MB")

The Interoperability Frontier: Apache Arrow Integration

Both pandas and polars are deeply invested in Apache Arrow, and this commitment has only strengthened over the past year. Arrow is a language-agnostic columnar memory format designed for efficient data interchange and processing. Its importance cannot be overstated in a heterogeneous data ecosystem. Just as choosing the right serialization format is critical—see our guide on JSON vs YAML vs JSON5: The Truth About Data Formats in 2025—the choice of memory format defines the ceiling of your application’s performance.

For Polars, Arrow is fundamental. Its core architecture is built directly on Rust’s Arrow implementation, meaning Polars DataFrames inherently use the Arrow columnar memory format. This enables zero-copy operations and vectorized processing via SIMD instructions. Pandas, on the other hand, has been increasingly integrating PyArrow as an optional, and now often default, backend for specific data types. Pandas 2.0 made PyArrow a required dependency for default string inference and introduced the concept of ArrowDtype DataFrames.

import pandas as pd
import polars as pl
import pyarrow as pa

# Pandas with PyArrow backend
df_pd_arrow = pd.read_csv("some_text_data.csv", dtype_backend='pyarrow')

# Polars naturally uses Arrow
df_pl = pl.read_csv("some_text_data.csv")

# Interchange via __dataframe__ protocol
df_from_polars = pd.api.interchange.from_dataframe(df_pl.__dataframe__())

Performance Benchmarking & Trade-offs: When to Choose What

Recent benchmarks consistently show Polars outperforming pandas in many common data operations, particularly with larger datasets.

Operation Type	`pandas` (Eager, NumPy/Arrow Backed)	`Polars` (Lazy, Rust/Arrow Backed)
Data Ingestion	Good, improving with `PyArrow`	Excellent, especially with pushdowns
Filtering	Efficient, but eager materialization	Highly efficient (predicate pushdown)
Aggregations	Can be slow due to memory copies	Outstanding, parallelized
Joins	Performance varies, memory-intensive	Very efficient, optimized hash joins
Memory Footprint	Higher (5-10x data size)	Significantly lower (2-4x data size)

Memory Management & Scalability: A Closer Look

Polars operates on a columnar data model where data for each column is stored contiguously as Apache Arrow arrays. For datasets larger than RAM, Polars offers hybrid out-of-core processing via its streaming API. This allows it to process data in chunks, transparently spilling intermediate results to disk when memory limits are reached.

API Evolution and Developer Experience

Polars’s expression system is a core differentiator, allowing complex transformations to be defined as single, optimized units. Expressions are composable, enabling developers to write highly readable and parallelizable code.

# Polars expression example
result_pl = df_pl.lazy().with_columns(
(pl.col("value") * 1.1).alias("value_x1.1"),
(pl.col("value").rank(method="min")).alias("value_rank"),
pl.when(pl.col("value") > 20).then(pl.lit("High")).otherwise(pl.lit("Low")).alias("value_tier")
).filter(pl.col("value_tier") == "High").collect()

Pandas has focused on consistency, with PDEP-14 and PDEP-10 indicating a move towards a performant native string dtype and making PyArrow a required dependency. The implementation of Copy-on-Write (PDEP-7) remains the most impactful evolution for the library’s stability.

The Future Trajectory: What’s Next on the Horizon

Looking ahead from late 2025, pandas is evolving to be a more performant and robust in-memory solution, while polars is rapidly becoming the de facto choice for high-performance, scalable, and potentially distributed data processing. Polars is aggressively expanding into GPU acceleration via NVIDIA RAPIDS cuDF and distributed execution through "Polars Cloud." The shared foundation of Apache Arrow ensures that data can flow efficiently between these powerful libraries, enabling hybrid workflows that leverage the strengths of each.

Sources

🛠️ Related Tools

Explore these DataFormatHub tools related to this topic:

CSV to JSON - Convert datasets to JSON
Excel to CSV - Import Excel into pandas

📚 You Might Also Like

This article was originally published on DataFormatHub, your go-to resource for data format and developer tools insights.

…