E-Commerce Cybersecurity in 2025: When Digital Certainties Crumbled and "Vibecoding" Emerged

Introduction: A Seismic Shift in the Digital Landscape

The year 2025 won’t be remembered in French digital history as a mere progression of cyber threats; it stands as a true tectonic rupture. While previous years witnessed a gradual escalation of dangers, 2025 was the year the floodgates burst, deluging the e-commerce and retail sectors with attacks of unprecedented sophistication and scale. This comprehensive analysis, crafted for security experts, strategic leaders, and digital economy observers, aims to meticulously dissect this "annus horribilis."

The era of theoretical warnings is decisively over. Crucial retail infrastructures, the cherished loyalty programs of our legacy brands, and the intricate supply chains fueling the French economy all suffered frighteningly regular breaches. From Auchan to Boulanger, including the LDLC group and the luxury market, no stronghold appeared immune. Simultaneously, regulatory bodies, epitomized by an increasingly assertive CNIL, levied exorbitant penalties for non-compliance, turning personal data management into a critical factor for financial survival.

However, beyond the alarming details of this data catastrophe, a pragmatic assessment is vital. These security breakdowns weren’t random occurrences or unavoidable technical misfortunes. Instead, they represent the logical outcome of flawed architectural decisions, accumulated technical debt, and the massive industrialization of cybercrime. As efforts are made to mend the wounds of 2025, a new horizon beckons for 2026, carrying both immense promise and an existential threat: "vibecoding." The widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence for producing software code, without the stringent oversight of the past, risks propelling us from managed insecurity into a realm of pervasive, systemic instability.

This report is structured around a thorough examination of 2025’s pivotal incidents, an exploration of the underlying causes of these failures, and a forward-looking perspective on the inherent risks of automated software development. Our objective is to understand how the French retail sector, a cornerstone of our economic sovereignty, can reclaim mastery over its digital future.

Part I: 2025 – The Unfolding of a Predicted Crisis

The year 2025 dawned under grim predictions, ultimately closing amidst an atmosphere of near-constant crisis. The threat landscape dramatically transformed, shifting from opportunistic strikes to highly targeted campaigns directly assaulting the core value of e-commerce businesses: customer data and trust.

1.1. French Retailers Under Siege: An Impact Overview

In 2025, the retail sector became a prime target for malicious actors. Unlike financial institutions, often fortified with "bunker-like" defenses, e-commerce presents an expansive attack surface, offering numerous entry points through mobile applications, transactional websites, and especially intricately linked loyalty programs.

Major Retailers Fall Victim

The summer of 2025 marked a significant psychological turning point for French consumers. The attack on Auchan in August served as a stark revelation of the vulnerabilities within loyalty systems. [1] It was not primarily the payment system that was compromised, but rather the marketing database – an asset frequently underestimated in its criticality. Attackers successfully exfiltrated millions of data points, including titles, names, email and postal addresses, phone numbers, loyalty card details, and customer statuses. [2] The repercussions of this breach extended beyond a simple privacy violation; it provided the perfect fodder for highly credible phishing campaigns, enabling cybercriminals to impersonate the brand with alarming accuracy.

Before the industry could fully process this shock, Boulanger confirmed a major intrusion in September. [3] This incident highlighted critical dependencies on third-party service providers. The stolen information, comprising full contact details and purchase histories, was swiftly leveraged for fraudulent technical support and fake delivery scams, exploiting customers’ anticipation for their new tech products. This attack underscored how brand trust could be weaponized against its own clientele.

The ongoing saga of the LDLC Group offers a particularly illuminating lesson on the persistence of threats. Having been victimized in March 2025, impacting its physical store network, the group suffered another assault in December. [5] Such a rapid recurrence, unusual for a technology company, reveals a troubling reality: post-attack remediation is a protracted and intricate process, often leaving behind "backdoors" or lingering vulnerabilities. Opportunistic ransomware groups like RansomHub or Qilin are quick to exploit these openings. [7]

The year concluded with a significant data leak affecting Leroy Merlin in December 2025. [2] The exposed data—identity, phone numbers, addresses, and loyalty information—mirrored that compromised in other retail breaches, suggesting a systematic campaign against French retail, possibly orchestrated by a single entity or a consortium of cybercriminals employing similar exploitation tactics.

The Luxury Sector: A High-Value Target

While mass retail grappled with widespread data theft, the luxury segment faced precise attacks aimed at high-value confidentiality. Between July and September 2025, major conglomerates such as Kering (parent company of Gucci and Balenciaga), alongside LVMH and Chanel, found themselves fending off significant cyber offensives. [1]

In this exclusive sector, the primary threat wasn’t merely the theft of credit card details but rather reputation-based extortion. Ransomware groups like Cl0p, known for their double extortion tactics, threatened to expose VIP customer lists, confidential marketing strategies, or proprietary manufacturing secrets. [7] These incidents demonstrated that even organizations with the most substantial cybersecurity budgets are not immune to compromise, often initiated by a simple phishing email or a vulnerability within a creative subcontractor.

1.2. The Dark Web’s New Commodity: Comprehensive Data Profiles

An analysis of 2025’s data breaches reveals a concerning pattern: the creation of complete "digital dossiers" on French citizens. These are no longer fragmented pieces of information but consolidated, rich profiles.

Exfiltrated Data Type	Affected Retailers (Partial List)	Impact and Criminal Exploitation
Personal Identity (Name, Title)	Auchan, Boulanger, Leroy Merlin, LDLC	Foundational data for social engineering and fraudulent document creation.
Contact Information (Email, Phone)	Auchan, Boulanger, Leroy Merlin, Free, SFR	Facilitates Smishing (fraudulent SMS), Vishing (fraudulent calls), and SIM Swapping.
Residential Address	Auchan, Leroy Merlin, Boulanger	Used for delivery scams, reconnaissance for burglaries (targeting high-tech/DIY purchases).
Loyalty Program Data (Card #, Status, Points)	Auchan, Leroy Merlin, Carrefour (attempts)	Enables contextual phishing ("Your points are expiring"), balance resale, and money laundering.
Limited Banking Data (IBAN, Card Endings)	Boulanger, Third-party vendors	Exploited for fraudulent debits via SEPA mandate forgery. [3]

This aggregation of data empowers cybercriminals to execute "augmented social engineering" attacks. By combining information from, for instance, a Leroy Merlin leak (address, potential home renovations) with data from Boulanger (appliance purchases), a scammer can call a victim with an intimate knowledge of their domestic life, making fraud detection incredibly difficult for an unsuspecting individual.

1.3. The Covert Menace: Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

Perhaps the most defining incident of 2025 was the massive cyberattack impacting over 200 companies through a vendor connected to the Salesforce and Google environments. [8] Attributed to the ShinyHunters group, this attack leveraged a classic weak point: the trusted third party.

By compromising a marketing or logistics technology provider, attackers gained lateral access to the databases of hundreds of e-commerce businesses. This strategy, which bypasses direct assaults on fortified perimeters by exploiting the service entrances open to providers, emphatically confirms that an e-commerce retailer’s security is no longer solely defined by its own robust firewalls, but by the resilience of its weakest partner. The pervasive reliance on SaaS (Software as a Service) ecosystems and third-party APIs has become a systemic vulnerability for the French retail sector.

Part II: Dissecting a Systemic Failure

It’s tempting to succumb to despair in the face of this deluge of incidents. However, a pragmatic analysis reveals the technical and organizational root causes of this systemic breakdown. In 2025, the triumph wasn’t due to some "magic" wielded by hackers, but rather the industrialization of proven tactics against outdated, static defenses.

2.1. The Rise of Infostealers and the Obsoletion of Traditional MFA

The year 2025 was dominated by Infostealers as the primary initial access vector. Malware variants such as SnakeStealer and Lumma Stealer proliferated, frequently disseminated through "Malvertising" campaigns or disguised as legitimate AI software. [7]

The attack mechanism is deceptively simple and effectively bypasses conventional defenses:

1. Infection: An employee (often remote or a contractor using personal equipment via BYOD) downloads a compromised software package.
2. Exfiltration: The malware doesn’t target the network directly; instead, it extracts "session cookies" stored within the web browser.
3. Bypass: These stolen cookies, once imported into the attacker’s browser, grant direct access to cloud applications (Salesforce, Office 365, Magento/Shopify back-office) as an already authenticated user.

This explains why 56% of attacks in 2025 leveraged valid, but compromised, accounts. [7] Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), a security cornerstone for the past decade, proved ineffective because the attacker intercepted the session after MFA had been successfully validated. For e-commerce, where access to back-office systems is vital for inventory and customer data management, this vulnerability is catastrophic.

2.2. Web Vulnerabilities and the Script Wars

On the application front, French e-commerce platforms saw a resurgence of "Client-Side" attacks. According to Akamai reports for 2025, XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) attacks constituted a staggering 40% of web attacks during the first quarter. [10]

This statistic underscores a fundamental flaw in the architecture of contemporary e-commerce websites. To deliver seamless and personalized user experiences, sites integrate dozens of third-party scripts, including chatbots, advertising trackers, analytics tools, and social media widgets. Each of these scripts, loaded directly into the client’s browser, represents a potential point of entry. If a third-party script is maliciously altered at its source, it can intercept data entered by the user, such as credit card numbers or passwords – this is the essence of Magecart or "Digital Skimming" attacks.

Furthermore, malicious bots accounted for 37% of total traffic on retail websites. [10] Beyond simple price scraping, these bots carried out "Credential Stuffing" (mass validation of stolen credentials from other breaches) and "Grinch Bot" attacks (bulk reservation of stock to resell at inflated prices), effectively paralyzing legitimate commercial activities and frustrating genuine customers.

2.3. The RaaS Explosion: Ransomware as a Service Evolves

The economic blueprint of cybercrime continued its evolution and refinement. Groups like RansomHub, which rapidly emerged as a dominant force in Q1 2025 following LockBit’s decline, and Qilin, highly active in Q2, further standardized attack methodologies. [7]

The innovation lies in their revised approach. While data encryption (disrupting operations) remains a tactic, data exfiltration purely for extortion purposes has taken precedence. For an e-merchant, business continuity is paramount, but GDPR compliance makes data confidentiality equally crucial. Attackers understand this dynamic and effectively monetize this fear. The retail sector experienced a 30% surge in ransomware attacks in 2025 [10], tragically confirming that ransom payments often occur, thereby fueling the next wave of sophisticated assaults.

Part III: Regulation – A Double-Edged Imperative

In 2025, French businesses faced not only aggressive hackers but also a regulator determined to enforce digital sovereignty through significant financial penalties. The CNIL (National Commission on Informatics and Liberty) scaled up its operations, imposing sanctions that were no longer mere warnings but had substantial financial repercussions.

3.1. The September 2025 Regulatory Upheaval

September 2025 will be etched in memory as the month when regulatory compliance became as financially significant as managing cyber risk itself.

Google’s Landmark Fine: 325 Million Euros

On September 1, 2025, the CNIL levied a historic fine of 325 million euros against Google. [11] The justifications for this penalty are critically important for every e-commerce entity:

• Deceptive Advertising: The inclusion of advertisements within Gmail’s "Promotions" and "Social networks" tabs, designed to mimic the appearance of genuine emails without explicit user consent (a violation of article L. 34-5 of the CPCE).
• Forced Cookies: The deployment of trackers upon account creation without obtaining valid consent.

This ruling sent an unequivocal message: "Dark Patterns" (manipulative interface designs) and ambiguous exploitation of user attention are no longer tolerated. For e-merchants heavily reliant on email marketing and retargeting for their CRM strategies, this represents a profound challenge to established marketing practices.

The Shein Sanction: 150 Million Euros

On the same day, the CNIL penalized the "Fast Fashion" behemoth, Shein, with a 150 million euro fine. [13] The primary complaints centered on cookies being deployed without consent, and more critically, the ineffectiveness of their refusal mechanisms. The "Reject all" button failed to genuinely block all trackers, and attempts to withdraw consent were not honored.

This sanction serves as a direct alert to the entire retail sector: the technical integrity of cookie consent banners (CMPs) must be genuine and subject to audit, not merely a declarative exercise.

3.2. The Regulatory Squeeze: Compliance Versus Incident Costs

A financial review of cybersecurity in 2025 reveals a profound "scissor effect."

• On one side, the average cost of a data breach in e-commerce surged to $4.45 million [10], encompassing remediation, lost business, and crisis management expenses.
• On the other, fines for non-compliance escalated dramatically. American Express, for example, received a 1.5 million euro penalty for abusive telemarketing practices. [15]

This environment compels companies to reallocate their budgets. Cybersecurity is no longer a simple IT expenditure; it has transformed into a provision for significant legal risk. The transposition of the NIS2 directive, though complex and facing implementation delays in France, is beginning to impose legal accountability on executives, mandating proportionate risk management measures. [16] For the retail industry, this translates into the daunting and expensive task of auditing their entire subcontracting ecosystem.

Part IV: 2026 and the Dawn of "Vibecoding" – Towards Generative Insecurity?

As Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) grapple with plugging the security gaps of 2025, a revolutionary shift in software development methodologies is taking shape, threatening to render existing security paradigms obsolete by 2026. This emergent trend is known as Vibecoding.

4.1. Understanding and the Expansion of Vibecoding

The term "Vibecoding," gaining traction in early 2025 thanks to Andrej Karpathy (formerly of OpenAI), describes a development approach where software creation is no longer about writing code, but rather "managing intent" through AI. [18]

The core principle is straightforward: a user articulates their desired outcome in natural language (e.g., "I need a payment page that supports cryptocurrency and automatically calculates VAT"), and a generative AI (LLM) then writes, assembles, and deploys the necessary code.

The statistics are telling: in 2025, 63% of users of these tools identified as "non-developers." [21] Platforms like Replit, Cursor, and Meta’s internal tools now enable product managers, designers, or marketers to craft functional applications without writing a single line of code. [22] Mark Zuckerberg even anticipates that by 2026, the majority of all code will be AI-generated. [23]

4.2. The Paradox of Enhanced Productivity and Worsening Security

While vibecoding promises an unparalleled acceleration of innovation, allowing prototypes to be built in hours instead of weeks, it simultaneously introduces an invisible yet colossal security debt.

The fundamental issue lies in the absence of qualified oversight. As Sridhar Vembu (Zoho) aptly noted, "code is magic until it isn’t." [24] The typical "vibecoder" lacks a deep understanding of the code they generate; their evaluation is based solely on the functional output of the application.

Yet, security reports from late 2025 are condemning:

• 45% of AI-generated code contains identifiable vulnerabilities. [25]
• AI models, trained on vast public code repositories (including insecure examples), frequently replicate classic flaws from the OWASP Top 10, such as SQL Injections, XSS, and authentication defects. [25]
• Unlike human-written code that benefits from peer reviews, AI-generated code is produced at scale, creating a volume that is impossible to manually verify.

4.3. Vibecoding’s Three Foremost Threats to E-Commerce in 2026

Applying vibecoding principles to the critical e-commerce sector paints a picture of potentially catastrophic scenarios for 2026.

A. Supply Chain Hallucinations (Package Impersonation)

Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit an unfortunate propensity to "hallucinate" software dependencies. When tasked with solving a complex problem, they might invent the name of a library that "should" exist.

Attackers are preempting this by deliberately creating these malicious packages on public repositories (like NPM or PyPI). An AI developer, or a "vibecoder," might then unwittingly import this AI-suggested library, thereby injecting malware directly into the core of their payment or inventory management infrastructure. [25] This represents an automated "Supply Chain" attack.

B. Business Logic Flaws

AIs excel at mastering syntax (the how of writing code) but struggle profoundly with complex semantics (the why behind the code’s existence). In an e-commerce context, this distinction is lethal.

Example: An AI generates shopping cart code. The code might be technically sound, avoiding crashes, but it could neglect to validate that the item’s price in the cart matches the database price at the point of payment. An attacker could then manipulate the client-side price and purchase a television for €1. Such logic flaws are exceedingly difficult to detect using current automated scanning tools.

C. The Emergence of "Shadow AI"

With the advent of vibecoding, every department—Marketing, HR, Logistics—effectively transforms into an independent development team. They will proceed to create thousands of micro-applications tailored to their specific needs, often bypassing traditional IT and CISO oversight. These applications, connected to sensitive company data, will become unsupervised security vulnerabilities, exponentially expanding the organization’s attack surface. This scenario aligns with the chilling prospect of "internet monoculture" and a loss of control projected for 2026. [27]

Part V: Strategic Recommendations – Shifting from Survival to Resilience

Confronted with this bleak outlook, fatalism is not an option. E-commerce businesses must undertake a pivotal strategic realignment for 2026. Security can no longer be merely a perimeter defense; it must become inherent to data itself and integrated into every stage of the software creation process.

5.1. Reinventing Identity and Access (The Post-MFA Landscape)

The events of 2025 underscored the failure of traditional authentication against the threat of infostealers. The imperative for 2026 is a radical adoption of Zero Trust principles.

Embracing Passkeys and Hardware Security Keys (FIDO2)

Reliance on phishable passwords and SMS/OTP codes must be abandoned. Hardware security keys or device-bound biometrics (Passkeys) significantly impede session theft.

Real-time Behavioral Session Analysis

Systems must be capable of detecting when a "valid" session is being accessed from an unusual location or device, or if it’s performing anomalous actions (e.g., mass data exfiltration), and terminate it immediately.

Dedicated Secure Workstations for Administrators

Access to critical back-office systems (like Shopify/Magento Admin or Cloud portals) should be restricted to "secure administrative workstations" (PAW) or via isolated browsers (Browser Isolation), making them resilient to prevalent infostealer attacks.

5.2. Governing Vibecoding: The Art of Context Engineering

Rather than outright banning vibecoding (which would inevitably lead to the proliferation of Shadow AI), organizations must establish a framework for its use. The role of the developer will evolve, moving towards that of an AI Code Auditor or a Context Engineer. [21]

AI Validation Pipelines

All AI-generated code must undergo rigorous scrutiny through dedicated security "sandboxes" and SAST/DAST scanners specifically trained to identify vulnerable AI code patterns.

Essential Security Training for "Non-Developers"

If marketing teams are developing applications, they must receive fundamental security training, focusing on concepts like the OWASP Top 10. This necessitates a significant cultural shift within organizations.

Strict Environment Isolation

Applications created through vibecoding should, by default, be denied access to critical production data. They must operate within isolated environments using anonymized datasets.

5.3. Supply Chain Security: A New Competitive Advantage

NIS2 compliance and the looming threat of cascading attacks will fundamentally reshape the relationship between principals and subcontractors.

Continuous Third-Party Auditing

It is no longer sufficient to simply have a security charter signed. Security rating tools must be deployed to continuously monitor supplier security postures in real-time.

Clear Liability Clauses

Contracts must explicitly define responsibilities in the event of a breach. If a provider is the cause of a data leak (as seen in the Salesforce/Google incident), they must bear the corresponding financial consequences.

Summary Table: Key Indicators for 2025 and Projections for 2026

The table below encapsulates the critical metrics that characterized the threat landscape of 2025 and offers projections for the upcoming year.

Indicator	2025 Data	Trend / Analysis	2026 Projection
CNIL Notifications Increase	+20% (vs 2024) [28]	Surge due to heightened vigilance and attack severity.	Stabilization at high levels, but increased fines.
Average Breach Cost (Global)	$4.45M [10]	Overall decrease but rise in US/EU Retail.	Anticipated increase due to class-action lawsuits and NIS2 penalties.
Primary Attack Vector	Compromised credentials (56%) [7]	Industrial exploitation of Infostealers.	Shift towards attacks on machine identities (APIs, Bots).
Targeted Phishing (E-commerce Customers)	+47% [10]	Widespread brand impersonation (Auchan, Boulanger).	AI-generated "Hyper-personalized" phishing.
CNIL Record Fine	€325M (Google) [11]	Penalization of business models built on forced data usage.	Probable targets: data brokers and non-compliant AI.
Vibecoding Adoption (Non-devs)	63% of users [21]	Massive democratization without adequate security frameworks.	Significant risk of "Shadow AI" and widespread logic flaws.
AI Code Vulnerability	45% vulnerable code [25]	Replication of historical insecure coding practices.	Critical need for advanced automated remediation tools.

Conclusion

The year 2025 marked the moment French e-commerce lost its innocence. The proliferation of successful attacks against national giants (Auchan, Boulanger, Leroy Merlin, LDLC) unequivocally demonstrated that digital transformation had come at the cost of systemic fragility. The personal data of millions of French citizens is now exposed, fueling a burgeoning underground economy.

Yet, this crisis also presents a vital opportunity for fundamental restructuring. The CNIL’s record-setting fines and the obligations of NIS2 are forcing a brutal but necessary evolution in maturity. For 2026, the critical question is not whether vibecoding will exacerbate issues, but how effectively we will manage this inherent risk. If we permit AI to generate code unsupervised, we will construct digital sandcastles on unstable foundations. However, if we successfully embed security at the core of this new generative era, replacing blind trust with continuous verification, then the retail sector might finally realize the promise of connected, fluid, and genuinely secure commerce.

This is not a moment for panic, but for clear-sighted reconstruction. The security landscape of 2026 will not be defined by mere lines of code, but by robust resilience strategies and unrelenting governance over artificial intelligence.

---

Article published on January 8, 2026 by Nicolas Dabène

---

Want to dive deeper into cybersecurity insights and stay ahead of the curve?

Don’t miss out on essential discussions and expert analyses.

• Connect with me on LinkedIn for regular updates and professional insights: https://fr.linkedin.com/in/nicolas-dab%C3%A8ne-473a43b8?utm_source=devTo&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=E-Commerce%20Cybersecurity%20Retrospective%202025:%20The%20Collapse%20of%20Certainties%20and%20the%20Specter%20of%20Vibecoding
• Subscribe to my YouTube channel for in-depth videos and practical guides: https://www.youtube.com/@ndabene06?utm_source=devTo&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=E-Commerce%20Cybersecurity%20Retrospective%202025:%20The%20Collapse%20of%20Certainties%20and%20the%20Specter%20of%20Vibecoding

Let’s build a more secure digital future together!