Credit: Markus Winkler from Pexels
Rising trade frictions over the past decade have sparked urgent questions about their long-term impact on global economies. The U.S. now applies tariffs of 66.4% on Chinese exports, which is higher compared to the average rate of 19.3%, while China retaliates with a 58.3% import tariff on U.S. exports, higher than the average rate of 21.1%.
These frictions not only disrupt regular trade flow, but also have long-term economic impacts. The geographical location of the market involved also plays an important role and is often influenced by tariff models. However, this aspect is often understudied and poorly understood.
Researchers examine…
Credit: Markus Winkler from Pexels
Rising trade frictions over the past decade have sparked urgent questions about their long-term impact on global economies. The U.S. now applies tariffs of 66.4% on Chinese exports, which is higher compared to the average rate of 19.3%, while China retaliates with a 58.3% import tariff on U.S. exports, higher than the average rate of 21.1%.
These frictions not only disrupt regular trade flow, but also have long-term economic impacts. The geographical location of the market involved also plays an important role and is often influenced by tariff models. However, this aspect is often understudied and poorly understood.
Researchers examine industry location and tariffs
Economists Professor Colin Davis from the Institute for the Liberal Arts, Doshisha University, Japan, and Professor Ken-ichi Hashimoto from the Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University, Japan, address this gap by adapting a two-country model to understand how a national tariff policy influences productivity growth through the link between industry location patterns and firm-level investment.
While talking about the motivation behind this study, Prof. Davis mentioned, "Prof. Hashimoto and I have spent more than a decade conducting theoretical research on the impact of the structure and geographic location of an industry on long-run productivity growth. Our work has focused on understanding the deep economic mechanisms linking innovation, industrial organization, and growth over time."
The two-country framework used in this study was previously developed by the authors.
Prof. Davis added, "The recent resurgence of import tariffs in global trade policy provided a timely and compelling real-world application for our framework. It offered an opportunity to use tools we had developed over many years to shed light on an active policy debate and to better understand the long-term growth consequences of trade interventions.
"In that sense, this project grew naturally out of our ongoing research agenda while responding to an important contemporary policy question."
The study is published in the journal Economic Modelling.
Key findings and policy implications
The study utilizes the model of industry location, international trade, and endogenous productivity growth with two industries and two countries. The researchers have examined how unilateral import tariffs affect industry location patterns and productivity growth, and have considered the implications for welfare. They have also conducted numerical evaluations of the welfare effects of tariff policies.
The study explains why similar trade policies can lead to very different growth outcomes across countries. It provides a theoretical framework for understanding how unilateral tariff policies can affect long-run productivity growth by reshaping the location of industries and innovative activities.
The results also suggest that the growth and welfare effects of tariffs depend critically on a country’s existing industrial structure, implying that similar policies may have very different outcomes across economies.
The study has multiple practical applications. The model identifies specific mechanisms, such as firm relocation, knowledge spillovers, and changes in innovation incentives, that can be tested using data on trade policy, industrial composition, and productivity.
Over the next five to 10 years, similar research studies on tariffs could significantly influence government perspectives on trade policy, innovation, and economic growth. By elucidating the impacts of tariffs on trade flows, industry location, and innovation, this framework can enhance economic policymaking.
Improved trade and industrial policies can lead to higher productivity, increased innovation, and stronger economies, potentially avoiding policies that hinder growth or lower living standards.
Well-designed policies can support job creation in innovative sectors and improve wage growth in the long run.
"Empirical studies, applying this framework, can yield insights into the long-term effects of trade interventions, fostering stable economic conditions and better outcomes for the firms, as well as the workers and consumers involved," concluded Prof. Davis.
More information: Colin Davis et al, Asymmetric tariffs and productivity growth in an endogenous market structure, Economic Modelling (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107383
Citation: Japanese study investigates how tariff policies influence long-run economic growth (2026, January 10) retrieved 10 January 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-01-japanese-tariff-policies-economic-growth.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.