Published 1 minute ago
A seasoned mechanical design engineer turned tech reporter and reviewer, Chandraveer brings more than four years of consumer tech journalism experience to the table, with bylines at Android Police and iPhoneHacks. He’s written about everything from UI and UX changes across various apps to emerging software and AI trends. At XDA, he showcases his versatility in the tech reporting space with articles rooted in personal experiences and frustrations.
Chandraveer’s passion for consumer tech spills over into hobbies such as mechanical keyboards, photography, and 3D printing. With an academic background in design and manufacturing, his insatiable curiosity spans beyond the digital domain. Chandraveer’s downtime is an eclectic mix of reading fiction, practicing callig…
Published 1 minute ago
A seasoned mechanical design engineer turned tech reporter and reviewer, Chandraveer brings more than four years of consumer tech journalism experience to the table, with bylines at Android Police and iPhoneHacks. He’s written about everything from UI and UX changes across various apps to emerging software and AI trends. At XDA, he showcases his versatility in the tech reporting space with articles rooted in personal experiences and frustrations.
Chandraveer’s passion for consumer tech spills over into hobbies such as mechanical keyboards, photography, and 3D printing. With an academic background in design and manufacturing, his insatiable curiosity spans beyond the digital domain. Chandraveer’s downtime is an eclectic mix of reading fiction, practicing calligraphy, conceptualizing new products, and enjoying an expansive FLAC audio library.
If you were expecting 2025 to be the year we finally got Star Trek replicators in our kitchens, I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but we aren’t quite there yet. 2025 wasn’t a landmark year for novel breakthroughs in 3D printing technology, at least for tabletop printers and hobbyists. Instead, this year was defined by refinement. We saw metal printing get a "brain" that fixes mistakes before they happen, and the use of AI for something other than generating images and essays, in slicer software. Tool-changer CNC machinery stepped down from its pedestal of elite industry-only clientele to serve a few hobbyists with deep pockets, through projects from Snapmaker and EufyMake.
Printability generally improved in 2025, with support for new squishier alternatives to TPU making 3D-printed bouncy balls a reality. Oh, and for the scientists in the room, we’re now printing tendon implants. Here is a breakdown of the six advancements that defined the year, and why you should care.
Related
These 5 free tools make 3D printing way easier for beginners
Your journey doesn’t have to be as challenging, thanks to the wealth of free resources you can find to help you learn all about 3D printing.
DMLS and DED tech have gotten better
Credit: metrology news
For the longest time, Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) and Directed Energy Deposition (DED) were a "print and pray" situation where damage that crept into the product only came to light once printing finished. You’d set up a job costing thousands of dollars in powder, hit start, and hope thermal warping didn’t introduce layer defects. This year, Nikon changed the game with a 3D Metrology system that monitors the print while it’s happening. It relies on a Lasermeister SB100 3D Metrology scanner paired with the LM300A DED printer.
If the system detects a layer is slightly off or a section is warping, it can adjust the print parameters on the fly to correct errors, at least on Nikon printers. This slashes scrap rates for commercial applications like aerospace and automotive, and for us, it means the trickle-down technology for "smart" error correction is coming. We are already seeing LiDAR on consumer printers, and active repair is the logical next step.
This year, entry-level metal FDM kits under $2,000 also emerged, letting hobbyists print durable steel and titanium parts at home with basic post-processing. This shift helped create stronger tools and custom hardware previously limited to pros.
AI optimization in slicer software
Machine learning, really
I’ve grown accustomed to manually calibrating and watching for print failure to ensure an 18-hour job doesn’t fail. In 2025, AI incorporated into slicing software like OrcaSlicer for features like guided calibration tests, failure detection with Obico, and toolpath optimization, eliminating the manual effort. Sadly for the resin printing community, the Chitubox slicer took a downturn this year with aggressive monetization, sending scores of users flocking to alternatives like Lychee.
Although AI is still used rather loosely here, and documentation for OrcaSlicer calls these machine learning-enabled additions, they know the PLA shapes that tend to curl up in the corners. So, adding localized brim structures there, while optimizing for speed, material usage, and simpler post-processing, has become a lot simpler than just five years ago.
Continuous Liquid Interface Production (CLIP)
A new method emerges
Credit: Carbon3D
If you hate waiting for resin prints, CLIP has been the holy grail, and 2025 saw it become more accessible. Unlike traditional SLA, which cures one distinct layer at a time, CLIP uses a permeable window that allows oxygen to inhibit curing at the very bottom. This creates a "dead zone" of liquid resin, allowing the build plate to pull the object continuously out of the vat. As you might imagine, layer lines are nonexistent, with the final appearance resembling injection-molded parts.
While Carbon has held the torch for this for a while, we are seeing variations of this continuous technology hitting the "prosumer" market. It means stronger parts (since they are isotropic) and less time watching paint dry—or in this case, resin cure. This could eventually replace DLP and LCD-based photopolymerization techniques currently used in base-model resin printers.
New filaments and resin options for users
A PEEK at colored resin and bouncy PEBA filament
Although growth wasn’t explosive, we saw our fair share of new materials emerge in the 3D printing space this year. For years, if you wanted colored resin, you had to mix messy dyes or paint it afterwards. Sunlu and others finally cracked the code with CMYK-style colored resins that can be mixed or used in multi-vat systems to create vibrant, colored prints.
On the filament side, we saw the rise of PEBA (Polyether Block Amide). It’s incredibly elastic and has a high energy return, making it perfect for printing things like custom shoe soles or RC car tires that need serious bounce. This material could phase out TPU in some applications since it returns from deformation to its original shape far quicker after sustained load is removed. And for the serious engineering crowd, PEEK (Polyether Ether Ketone) filament became more printable on desktop machines thanks to better high-temp extruders. We are talking about printing parts that can survive inside a car engine, right on your workbench.
Popularization of tool changers
Multi-material printing made way easier
If you asked me two years ago about multi-material printing, I would have pointed you to a Bambu Lab AMS and gifted you large Ikea trash bins for the wastage. 2025 killed that compromise with the rise of affordable tool changers—tech previously reserved only for industrial-grade lathes and milling machines.
Snapmaker’s U1 leads the pack, but they’re swapping toolheads effectively, reducing wastage and print time in multi-material prints. You can print PLA supports for a PETG model without worrying about them fusing together; moreover, there’s no need to flush the nozzle when switching from black to white because you’re switching to another print head altogether.
By extension, high-end printers like the Ourobionics Chimera are demonstrating conductive materials printed alongside structural ones, paving the way for printing fully functional electronics in one go.
Related
How long should a 3D print take? 5 things I learned the hard way
Your slicer’s estimate is only half the story. Here are the real factors that decide how long your 3D prints actually take.
Bio-printing tendon and ligament implants
Medical advancements
Credit: Brinter
Okay, you can’t do this one in your garage, but companies like SP3D have made massive strides in bio-printing tendon and ligament implants that actually mimic the biomechanics of human tissue. Another company, Brinter, made 3D bioprinted tendon and ligament implants that use living cells in a three-layer structure with a polymer core and collagen for cell growth. This technology, tested in animal studies and selected for space missions, advances regenerative medicine. Additionally, space-based bio-printing by Auxilium Biotechnologies produced eight implantable devices in microgravity aboard the ISS in February 2025.
Using bio-inks that encourage cell growth, your body could eventually accept and integrate these implants. It’s a stark reminder that while we are printing Baby Yodas, the same underlying tech is fixing knees and shoulders. It validates the entire industry, tinkerers, and professionals alike.
The plateau that 2025 was
If I’m being honest, 2025 might feel like a plateau for 3D printing advancements when compared to the leaps and bounds AI took in the same time frame. But in the Gartner Hype Cycle, printing tech has hit the plateau of productivity. The features that were once reserved for million-dollar machines—like active error correction and tool changing — are now sitting on desks in hobby rooms. The community keeps inching towards useful, democratized manufacturing, one Benchy at a time.