You should take these as quite context-specific numbers rather than as absolutes, nonetheless this is interesting: Scientists who engage in AI-augmented research publish 3.02 times more papers, receive 4.84 times more citations and become research project leaders 1.37 years earlier than those who do not. By contrast, AI adoption shrinks the collective volume of scientific topics studied by 4.63% and decreases scientists’ engagement with one another by 22%. Here is the full Nature piece by Qianyue Hao, Fengli Xu, Yong Li, and James Evans. The end sentence of course does not have to be a negative. Via the excellent Kevin Lewis . The post Claims about AI and science appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION . Comments “AI adoption shrinks the collective volume of scientific … by dearieme Relate…
You should take these as quite context-specific numbers rather than as absolutes, nonetheless this is interesting: Scientists who engage in AI-augmented research publish 3.02 times more papers, receive 4.84 times more citations and become research project leaders 1.37 years earlier than those who do not. By contrast, AI adoption shrinks the collective volume of scientific topics studied by 4.63% and decreases scientists’ engagement with one another by 22%. Here is the full Nature piece by Qianyue Hao, Fengli Xu, Yong Li, and James Evans. The end sentence of course does not have to be a negative. Via the excellent Kevin Lewis . The post Claims about AI and science appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION . Comments “AI adoption shrinks the collective volume of scientific … by dearieme Related Stories The share of factor income paid to computers Negative political externalities from migration to Britain? A new economic model of AI and automation