I used to always want to rewrite my code. Maybe even use another programming language. « If only I could rewrite my code, it would be so much better now. »
If you maintain software projects, you see it all the time. Someone new comes along and they want to start rewriting everything. They always have subjective arguments: it is going to be more maintainable or safer or just more elegant.
If your code is battle tested… then the correct instinct is to be conservative and keep your current code. Sometimes you need to rewrite your code : you made a mistake or must change your architecture. But most times, the old code is fine and investing time in updating your current code is …
I used to always want to rewrite my code. Maybe even use another programming language. « If only I could rewrite my code, it would be so much better now. »
If you maintain software projects, you see it all the time. Someone new comes along and they want to start rewriting everything. They always have subjective arguments: it is going to be more maintainable or safer or just more elegant.
If your code is battle tested… then the correct instinct is to be conservative and keep your current code. Sometimes you need to rewrite your code : you made a mistake or must change your architecture. But most times, the old code is fine and investing time in updating your current code is better than starting anew.
The great intellectual Robin Hanson argues that software ages. One of his arguments is that software engineers say that it does. That’s what engineers feel but whether it is true is another matter.
« Before Borland’s new spreadsheet for Windows shipped, Philippe Kahn, the colorful founder of Borland, was quoted a lot in the press bragging about how Quattro Pro would be much better than Microsoft Excel, because it was written from scratch. All new source code! As if source code rusted. The idea that new code is better than old is patently absurd. Old code has been used. It has been tested. Lots of bugs have been found, and they’ve been fixed. There’s nothing wrong with it. It doesn’t acquire bugs just by sitting around on your hard drive. Au contraire, baby! Is software supposed to be like an old Dodge Dart, that rusts just sitting in the garage? Is software like a teddy bear that’s kind of gross if it’s not made out of all new material? » (Joel Spolsky)
