Retraction Watch · Scour

Controversial Paxil “Study 329” earns expression of concern after critic sues publisher

retractionwatch.com·29w

Sleuth loses paper for duplicate publication after flagging hundreds of untrustworthy articles

retractionwatch.com·30w

Iraqi dean earns another retraction for paper posted for sale on Facebook

retractionwatch.com·30w

A peer-reviewed paper claimed a researcher was an expert in sex robots. He’s not.

retractionwatch.com·30w

Weekend reads: PubMed during the US shutdown; EU commissioner ‘appears to cite’ discredited study; KPMG corrected ‘phantom’ reference in gov’t report

retractionwatch.com·30w

Soil scientist previously named in citation scandal appointed to editor role at Elsevier journal

retractionwatch.com·30w

Deputy minister in Iraq losing papers with signs of paper mill involvement

retractionwatch.com·30w

‘Cosmic magnet’ study retracted after cleaning agent wipes away results

retractionwatch.com·31w

Editors of criminology journal resign amid concern about review times

retractionwatch.com·31w

$1.5 million program targets changes to academic incentives

retractionwatch.com·31w

Weekend reads: Science publishing a ‘hot mess’; AI microscopy ‘indistinguishable’ from real; social media as a bellwether for retractions

retractionwatch.com·31w

Wiley retracts study stolen by reviewer, following Retraction Watch coverage

retractionwatch.com·31w

Journal issues speedy retraction in less than a day for ‘inadvertent mistake’

retractionwatch.com·31w

Former student who ran paper mill up to 11 retractions

retractionwatch.com·32w

Sleuth unearths citation, authorship issues at earth sciences journal

retractionwatch.com·32w

Duke scientists lose eight papers for alleged image manipulation

retractionwatch.com·32w

Weekend reads: U.S. EPA tells scientists to stop publishing; ‘unreliable’ Tylenol research; Alzheimer’s paper retracted

retractionwatch.com·32w

Taylor & Francis threatens legal action against anonymous group’s ‘highly defamatory’ claims

retractionwatch.com·32w

Authors defend retracted paper on vitamin D and COVID-19 critic called ‘deeply bizarre’

retractionwatch.com·32w

Math has publication fraud, too

retractionwatch.com·33w

Log in to enable infinite scrolling