Retraction Watch · Scour

‘Biologically implausible distributions’ and self-plagiarism result in 10 retractions for ob-gyn

retractionwatch.com·40w

Fighting coordinated publication fraud is like ‘emptying an overflowing bathtub with a spoon,’ study coauthor says

retractionwatch.com·40w·Hacker News

Springer Nature retracts book with fake citations. Help us find more cases like this.

retractionwatch.com·40w·Hacker News

Weekend reads: Retraction Watch’s 15th birthday; ‘the superstar scientist’ who faked data; sleuths vs. integrity officers on handling misconduct

retractionwatch.com·40w

Happy 15th anniversary, Retraction Watch

retractionwatch.com·40w

AI research journal with sham board, metrics holds researcher’s paper hostage

retractionwatch.com·40w

Noticed: Sleuths are starting to get credit for retractions

retractionwatch.com·41w

27-year-old Nature paper earns expression of concern

retractionwatch.com·41w

Frontiers to retract 122 articles, links thousands in other publishers’ journals to “unethical” network

retractionwatch.com·41w

Weekend reads: Science retracts ‘arsenic life’ paper; another journal issue on Palestine cancelled; JAMA, NEJM editors decry political interference

retractionwatch.com·41w

Panel upholds results of contested U Toronto mammography study

retractionwatch.com·41w

Reviewer accused of stealing manuscript and publishing it as his own denies he refereed it

retractionwatch.com·41w

After 15 years of controversy, Science retracts ‘arsenic life’ paper

retractionwatch.com·41w·Hacker News

Misconduct investigation at U.S. military university uncovers image duplication

retractionwatch.com·42w

Microbiome company CEO who linked COVID vaccine to bacterial decline now has four retractions

retractionwatch.com·42w

Weekend reads: India institutes face penalties for retractions; editors resign after publisher sold; should the Tuskegee Study be retracted?

retractionwatch.com·42w

Director of Cambridge toxicology institute retracts paper for potential image manipulation

retractionwatch.com·42w

‘Biased’ and ‘unethical’: Journal objects to Scopus delisting

retractionwatch.com·42w

Springer Nature to retract machine learning book following Retraction Watch coverage

retractionwatch.com·43w

Wake Forest cancer lab blames ‘honest mistakes’ for retractions

retractionwatch.com·43w

Log in to enable infinite scrolling