Retraction Watch
retractionwatch.com

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Black marks on published papers don’t change citation rates, new study finds

Retraction Watch3 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Weekend reads: What paper mills charge for author slots; UK Biobank data breached; what researchers think of the future of science

Retraction Watch4 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Buying a first author slot can cost you anywhere from $56 to $5,600

Retraction Watch6 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Journal goes dark after impersonating Eric Topol and others

Retraction WatchHN3 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Another retraction and two investigations for chemist

Retraction Watch3 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

A response to: Should universities investigate questionable papers students and faculty wrote elsewhere?

Retraction Watch2 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

‘I asked him to stop’: Father adds daughter’s name to over 100 preprints without her permission

Retraction Watch2 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Major pharmacology journals flag another 15 papers by scientist facing criminal probe

Retraction Watch4 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

10 years ago, Elisabeth Bik published a preprint heard around the world

Retraction Watch7 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Weekend reads: An alternative to the impact factor in China; the clinical trials of six ‘superretractors’; Retraction Watch goes to Capitol Hill

Retraction Watch4 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

45 editors resign from math journal, former EIC calls Elsevier publisher a ‘mini-dictator’

Retraction WatchHN3 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Retraction Watch testifies in Congressional hearing on scientific publishing

Retraction Watch2 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

“Game-changer” breast cancer study retracted as Indiana researcher out of his post

Retraction WatchHN3 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

BMJ retracts most of a special issue for ‘compromised’ peer review and ‘improbable device use’

Retraction Watch3 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Scientist who alleged COVID cover-up circulated a faked NIH email, agency says

Retraction Watch6 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Weekend reads: LLMs ‘are not the problem’; Cash for peer review ‘doesn’t work,’ project finds; ‘Many Flaws, Few Retractions’ in vaping literature

Retraction Watch4 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Canadian panel seeks to add more teeth to research oversight

Retraction Watch5 min read
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Could a national database of scientific misconduct rulings stop repeat offenders?

Retraction Watch
Read on Scour →
Feeds

A journal named a sleuth in a correction. The sleuth says that was ‘ethical editorial malpractice’

Retraction Watch
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Publisher changes citation, registration policies following Retraction Watch investigation

Retraction Watch
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Keyboard shortcuts

Navigation

Next / previous post
j/k
Open post
oorEnter
Preview post
v

Post actions

Love post
a
Like post
l
Dislike
d
Undo reaction
u
Save / unsave
s

Recommendations

Add interest / feed
Enter
Not interested
x

Go to

Home
gh
Interests
gi
Feeds
gf
Likes
gl
History
gy
Changelog
gc
Settings
gs
Discover
gb
Search
/

General

Show this help
?
Submit feedback
!
Close modal / unfocus
Esc

Press ? anytime to show this help