Sorry, NYT, but, yes, “Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis” was junk science

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Bayesian inference (and mathematical reasoning more generally) isn’t just about getting the answer; it’s also about clarifying the mapping from assumptions to i...

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Announcing two new members of our blogging team . . .

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Softmax is on the log, not the logit scale

statmodeling.stat.columbia.eduHN
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Data manipulation in the world of long-distance swimming!

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

How to cheat at Codenames; cheating at board games more generally

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Addressing legitimate counterarguments in a scientific review: The challenge of being an insider

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

The marginalization or Jeffreys-Lindley paradox: it’s already been resolved.

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Stanford medical school professor misrepresents what I wrote (but I kind of understand where he’s coming from)

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

The true meaning of the alzabo

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Delicate language for talking about statistical guarantees

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

“Accounting for Nonresponse in Election Polls: Total Margin of Error”

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

How did the press do on that “black spatula” story? Not so great.

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

He took public funds and falsified his data. Are they gonna make him pay back the $19 million?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Applications of (Bayesian) variational inference?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Iterative imputation and incoherent Gibbs sampling

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

“The Exceptions: Nancy Hopkins, MIT, and the Fight for Women in Science”

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

The well-meaning but useless or counterproductive social science establishment

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Read on Scour →
Feeds

The most interesting part of the story is that the publisher went through all these steps of reviewing and revising. If they just want to make money by publish...

statmodeling.stat.columbia.eduHN
Read on Scour →
Feeds

Keyboard shortcuts

Navigation

Next / previous post
j/k
Open post
oorEnter
Preview post
v

Post actions

Love post
a
Like post
l
Dislike
d
Undo reaction
u
Save / unsave
s

Recommendations

Add interest / feed
Enter
Not interested
x

Go to

Home
gh
Interests
gi
Feeds
gf
Likes
gl
History
gy
Changelog
gc
Settings
gs
Discover
gb
Search
/

General

Show this help
?
Submit feedback
!
Close modal / unfocus
Esc

Press ? anytime to show this help