DEV Community

When SuSiE Says '95% Confident', Is It? (opens in new tab)

Discussed on DEV

Benchmarking the Honesty of Fine-Mapping Credible Sets Fine-mapping has a promise built into its output, and almost nobody checks whether the promise is kept. When you run SuSiE on a GWAS locus, it hands you a credible set: a small group of variants that, at a stated confidence level like 95%, should contain the true causal variant. That 95% is a claim about reality. Among all the loci where SuSiE reports a 95% credible set, the true causal variant should be inside the set 95% of the time. Is...

Read the original article
Sign in to keep reading the full article.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Navigation

Next / previous post
j/k
Open post
oorEnter
Preview post
v

Post Actions

Love post
a
Like post
l
Dislike post
d
Undo reaction
u
Save / unsave
s

Recommendations

Add interest / feed
Enter
Not interested
x

Go to

Home
gh
Interests
gi
Feeds
gf
Likes
gl
History
gy
Changelog
gc
Settings
gs
Discover
gb
Search
/

General

Show this help
?
Submit feedback
!
Close modal / unfocus
Esc

Press ? anytime to show this help