DEV Community

How to prove your AI wasn't trained on private data (opens in new tab)

Discussed on DEV

The NYT sued OpenAI. Getty sued Stability AI. Every AI company with a copyright problem is now asking the same question: can we prove what was and wasn't in our training set? Until now, the honest answer was no. Training runs are one-way operations — you can say "we used Common Crawl" but you can't issue a cryptographic proof that a specific document was excluded. CompletenessManifest is a Python library that changes that. It's part of Cathedral-Constraint-Field, and it lets you build trainin...

Read the original article
Sign in to keep reading the full article.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Navigation

Next / previous post
j/k
Open post
oorEnter
Preview post
v

Post Actions

Love post
a
Like post
l
Dislike post
d
Undo reaction
u
Save / unsave
s

Recommendations

Add interest / feed
Enter
Not interested
x

Go to

Home
gh
Interests
gi
Feeds
gf
Likes
gl
History
gy
Changelog
gc
Settings
gs
Discover
gb
Search
/

General

Show this help
?
Submit feedback
!
Close modal / unfocus
Esc

Press ? anytime to show this help