Evaluating the Evaluator: How to Test an LLM Judge with Microsoft Agent Framework (opens in new tab)

The four verdicts, up front Consistency: mean CV across posts 5.30% Pipeline format checks: pipeline pass rate 100% Rubric adherence (strict judge): 5.00 / 5, mean math drift 0.05 pts Calibration vs. labels: Pearson r = 0.51, MAE = 22.9 pts Three of those say the model is healthy. The last one is the only one that compared the model against anything real, and it tells a different story. Where we left off In Post 1 I built Viral or Fail, three Microsoft Agent Framework agents that pressure-tes...

Read the original article
Sign in to keep reading the full article.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Navigation

Next / previous post
j/k
Open post
oorEnter
Preview post
v

Post Actions

Love post
a
Like post
l
Dislike post
d
Undo reaction
u
Save / unsave
s

Recommendations

Add interest / feed
Enter
Not interested
x

Go to

Home
gh
Interests
gi
Feeds
gf
Likes
gl
History
gy
Changelog
gc
Settings
gs
Discover
gb
Search
/

General

Show this help
?
Submit feedback
!
Close modal / unfocus
Esc

Press ? anytime to show this help