lesswrong.com

Thoughts on Likelihood of Existential Risks by Misaligned AIs (opens in new tab)

TLDR:AI safety is confusing to navigate, because it is a pre-paradigmatic field composed of people making different, theoretical arguments for why x-risk is likely (or unlikely).Arguments that x-risk is likely are unfalsifiable and have little empirical evidence. This does not mean they’re wrong.Much of your probability of x-risk boils down to your priors, and whether you more heavily weight theory or empiricismI think AI safety is important to work on, but I’m optimistic that alignment will ...

Read the original article
Sign in to keep reading the full article.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Navigation

Next / previous post
j/k
Open post
oorEnter
Preview post
v

Post Actions

Love post
a
Like post
l
Dislike post
d
Undo reaction
u
Save / unsave
s

Recommendations

Add interest / feed
Enter
Not interested
x

Go to

Home
gh
Interests
gi
Feeds
gf
Likes
gl
History
gy
Changelog
gc
Settings
gs
Discover
gb
Search
/

General

Show this help
?
Submit feedback
!
Close modal / unfocus
Esc

Press ? anytime to show this help