Comparing Apologetical Methods: Jonathan Sheffield vs. Michael Licona • Richard Carrier Blogs (opens in new tab)

There is a largely overlooked internal debate among Christian apologists about approach. The gist of which is how much Christians should allow fudging, omitting, spinning, and overreach (though the pro side would never describe what it’s doing that way, which is part of the problem). A paradigmatic example is with the authorship of the Gospels: […]