11:02 pm

the guns i gave was the only way to unfreeze food dates and health care benefits. republicans control the white house, the senate, and the house. this was as far as they would go as part of to shut down. this was the only deal on the tape. but other democrats in washington side of the 5 isn’t over. also coming up, high level resignations have to britain’s b. b. c of the editing of donald trump, speech. the look of accusations of bias and accountability in the mainstream media . my set down over the weekend because the buck stops is made. but i’d like to make one thing very clear. there’s no institutionally biased the, i’m feel welcome to vidalia and we stopped in the united states. we have as now

11:03 pm

hope that the longest government shut down on record could be about 2. and that’s after several democrats in the centers back to republican funding bill and a rat. we can section about the compromise still needs to be approved by lawmakers in the house of representatives. the historic shut down has left workers without pay and disrupted this central services. on this vote, the gays are 60 in the naser, 43 fifths of the senate, duly chosen, and sworn. having voted in the affirmative. the motion upon reconsideration is agreed to sent in to the us government shut down is now inside after the senate voted to advance a bill to restore federal funding through january cortez mass. the stalemate was broken by 8 democrats who agreed to the jail, even though it admits their parties to demand extending affordable health care subsidies. a vote on that will now be held in december. democrats who split with

11:04 pm

their party defended their reasoning him or one is to make sure that the government is functioning so that our kids eat so that our elderly citizens eats so that our air traffic controllers can get some sleep and our money the shut down which began october, 1st is the longest in us history. it’s also shaping up to be the most damaging. economically. federal workers aren’t being paid and food aid for millions of americans has been suspended. air traffic has also been disrupted with thousands of flights, canceled and delayed due to staff shortages which they said that wasn’t happening. yeah, because we need, especially during the holidays, we need these people to work so that we can have a good holiday and an air traffic control. so yes, yes, we need them. i’m under worried again. we have plans. we make sense based on the

11:05 pm

flights that we buy. so it worries me then maybe we can use or play, then lose our jobs. the shut down could end this week, but several hurdles must be cleared. that includes opposition from democratic senators who could delay its passage while the senate moves towards a final vote, how speak up mike johnson has been cutting lawmakers to hurry back to washington, after keeping the chain box of sessions since september. you know, wants to vote on the do as quickly as possible and be blamed democrats for the shut down, but the cold, shameful, and needless but house democrats say they will continue the fight to have a health care funding. it appears to us this morning that our long national nightmare is finally coming to an end, and we are grateful for that. we applaud the 7 senate democrats and one independent senator who did the right thing they, they decided to put principal over their, their personal politics. and in my,

11:06 pm

my urgent plea of all my colleagues in house. and that means every democrat in the house is to, to think carefully pray. and finally do the right thing will continue to wage this fight. no matter what comes over to us. from the united states senate, we will sit down with any republicans, any time, any place, anywhere in order to find a bipartisan path forward. but we’re not down with them my way or the highway approach to governance. that’s failed. the american people. so is the longest shut down in us history likely to end this week is political analysts part is full not. i mean the, i think it very much looks this way. there has been the 6240 volt and the summit. i guess the whole still needs to vote on it. there are a couple of hurdles stood up soon to be taken, but it looks like the momentum is on the side of passing and overcoming the

11:07 pm

government shuttle to democrats didn’t get what they wanted, which was the health care subsidies, the tax credits on to you. um the affordable care act that’s to run out at the end of the year. but on the other hand of that you, you also didn’t get every single one that i wanted to basically sucked on or having to reduce the impact of the government to the comfortability office, which didn’t succeed in doing. but federal layoffs are being reversed. the money is going to be paid back to the workers. there will be a folder, as we heard on, on the exception of the tax credits in december. so yes, a compromise that’s been the phone. but a tricky one. a us president donald trump face, threatening the b b. c. with a $1000000000.00 lawsuit. if it was his lawyer say, what defamatory edits to a speech he gave, just before the 2021 us capital arrives, the british broadcast that has admitted to using the misleading edits and issued an

11:08 pm

apology. the scandal has prompted the resignations of the bbc’s top executive and its news chief the bbc is facing an unprecedented leadership crisis. director general team davey and news chief debra to and asked how they both resigned following accusations of editorial by us in the organization. the crisis centers on a leak internal memo that flagged on t trump by us in the bbc’s coverage of last year’s us election. most damaging was how the panorama program editors, a speech by the us president, making it appear he and signed to the january 6 capital riots or was that it was outgoing news chief deborah tennis insist the mistakes do not imply bias or step down over the weekends because about stop sydney, but i’d like to make one thing very clear. did you see me is not institutionally

11:09 pm

biased. that’s why it’s a well most trusted needs provider. the chair of the bbc’s board apologized and elected to parliament, calling the incident, an error of judgement. we had commissioned, respected to how well we’ve covered the us elections, and that was quite a substantial piece of research. and just for the sake of finding full picture, the overall conclusion, was that redone extremely while properly impartially. we did a good job. they what areas of concern of which the panorama was 1. 9 hindsight. it would have been better to go back to the idea. but we did many around the world rely on the bbc for impartial news, which is regulated by its own charter. but ultimately, the broadcaster is funded by the public and has to maintain that trust author’s think the reputation of the paving say as thing tony. because your role in the baby

11:10 pm

. so you for impartiality. i don’t think of the policy. psych, sean, the impartial reporting on. so what would events? yeah, the same that was done not to see proper massive but we made mistakes. i mean seems to have this goes from his head to produce the air in many rooms. the bbc now has to replace its leadership to keep it focused on covering the news rather than becoming the story. sonya soda is a newspaper columnist on the broadcast that she joins us from the welcome to data you. i’m was this the right outcome giving it was the, it was the bite thing to happen to, to sup, senior executives, the director general and the corporations have him use of a step down of arrows that would clearly not vasquez and made much lower down the hierarchy i do think it’s right that senior bbc executives take

11:11 pm

responsibility for iris mistakes. editorial bias at the bbc because the end of the day they are accountable for cope the culture and the institutional rules and culture in which mistakes happen. so i do think that it’s important of every se, accountability, however, that the issues go much further than the one paderoma documented tree which appeared to splice together. donald trump speaking at 2 different payments in time to make it look like he said something pe happen. the need to memorize the bbc board also covers allegations about bias and then like of impartiality and a number of other barriers. i think the worrying thing is, is that we’re seeing these high profile resignations, but even it says resignations have happened, the people resigning,

11:12 pm

but it will say the bbc chair has said that we made some mistakes, but we don’t accept that as an issue in culture and we don’t accept that there are issues with impartiality at the b, b, c. and for me, that is too defensive because it’s a while holding impartiality that the bbc can a officer. it’s critics interesting that this tied to a head over this panorama of his documentary program about donald trump. and donald trump, a political phenomenon that has had lots of news organizations scratching that has about how much of what emanates from the wife. how does these news and how much you might just cold noise? and i guess you believe that the, the bbc is just decided that it’s on the trunk. i mean, i think the bigger issues, right? so i think it was a very agree just editorial error. this editing of this document shape, i actually think the bigger issues around impartiality around at the,

11:13 pm

to reference in them. i may say reporting of israel gaza. i’m reporting of the conflict between women’s rights and trends rights in the u. k. these the, to the main hope be contested social issues in the u. k. i think that was good evidence presented in that monday that the bbc has let its down to impartiality slipped say for example, on the issue of trans right spaces, women’s rights. it absolutely looks like it’s take one side in that debate, threats reporting. it has no rep present to the device perspective the exist in the cale not in a lot of. it’s probably bombing on its own light output. and that is really hoping to talk about the impartiality. this is something that the, the bbc as a news organizations. and indeed many of us argue about endlessly for hours and hours and hours. and i think the bbc talks about what it goals do you, impartiality, you talk about the need for a diverse state of use,

11:14 pm

but sometimes not always on arguments. the settled that if, if you’re having a discussion about climate change, it doesn’t mean to say that you necessarily have to have a climate denial est uh, on the 2nd program. it, it, if you have a program about one side of an argument doesn’t necessarily follow that you have the, the opposite view on that same program so long as it’s represented somewhere within the output does not work. of the issues with impartiality all around climate. the issues around contested debates where there was a diversity of each of them. e k. on the debate on sex and gender, for example. the majority of the british public believe that people should live in that, that, that people are free to sort of identify as a one that, that men should not be able to self identify in to women spaces services. i’m schools. the bbc has taken a starting point contested minority by make believe that it is right that ben should be able to self identify into those spaces rough. for example,

11:15 pm

you go to the, what we don’t need to do isn’t it really suggested, but what, what is important is it may take your point. no, let me, let me just show you what i’m. i’m but what i’m where we are now access is in your answer that this is not the fest, old issue. so if it’s, if the issue is not settled, then you as far as your concerned both sides of the argument needs to be presented at the same time in order for that impartiality to get that. i just want to take the steps. we either need to be method. i’m to donald trump, now is threatening legal action over the best best program and they speak edit. how do you believe the b, b. c should respond with criticism, shifts from public argument into legal quite as i legal intimidation. but it will have to defend itself. so that’s how the legal system works. but it’s

11:16 pm

a great shame. it was a very agree just our, i’m, i think it’s a great shame that the bbc is hunted, x protects. so we’re definitely people. i’m a supporter of public service broadcasting. i’m a support at the bbc, but i can see that there are issues i wanted leadership to tackle them. it’s really disappointing when the bbc hundreds gifts to a pilot. so the bbc here will to bring it down like best one, and trump says to me, isn’t the fine of the bbc. and so how damaging van do you think that this scandal, if i’m cold about, has been to the bbc’s claim to be the world’s most trusted news? brand? i think you, there’s damage and i don’t think it’s about just the trump document. che, i think it’s about the issues like israel, gaza on sex agenda that all clear issues with impartiality and some people might say, well, these are just a couple of issues. most of the bbc’s journalistic him input output is high quality and it’s impartial. and i would agree with that. the problem is if you’ve got the

11:17 pm

bbc not sticking to impartiality on some of the vice contested issues of all the time. the public see that on an ongoing support for the trust and the bbc’s output as a whole. that isn’t fair when bbc john les alex, nope, that was the public. so it was a real culture of the she had whether need to ship needs to get a grant. it needs to say that this is what impartiality means and it needs to say to it style, you’re very welcome to have to pass the opinions on these contested debates that they need to stay possible. they comp be allowed to shape bbc need. it outputs the extent that things get misreported or to the extent that certain perspectives in the debate about expected help by the majority of breast or not committed in bbc out. thanks for joining us. so sonya sonya soda, newspaper columnist and broadcast the science is clear. we come unless spring temperatures back down to 1.5 degrees

11:18 pm

celsius of any temporary overshoot. limiting is not a strategy. we need solutions. well that was you in climate change time and stay unless they felt un climate conference got underway. in brazil, the stakes are unusually high this year, 10 years after the parish agreement was reached and the world is not on track to meet its targets. current policies point towards roughly $2.00 degrees of roaming. that’s well above the one and a half degree limit. the government’s signed up to as to the fact that this is that they will 2nd biggest c o 2 inmates of the united states. the state of life and is once again withdrawing from the power steel and his leadership gap as he must as developing nations demand increased funding. zip codes, revise and temperatures, floods, droughts, and rising sea levels of issues. host brazil is pushing

11:19 pm

a new tropical forest protection fund. i mean cubic ward countries that preserve ryan forest and penalize those the don’t. so we’ve global politics so fractured because it was president and really necessarily the syllabi said now was the time to fight back against climate change. the now corporate culture, 13 will be the cup of truth and i had at the, in the age of misinformation, those who seek to a skew, the truth, reject them, not totally scientific evidence, but also the progress of multilateralism. they control algorithms, so hatred and spread fear they attacked institutions, science and universities. it is time to inflict a new defeat on the denial so made for the bottom of the heart that, oh no god, you alexandra scott to senior climate diplomacy exports at the time in time it’s a change. think tank

11:20 pm

a code climate. welcome to the w. y a down of goods flying thousands of miles around the world to present for this meeting if the target on being match and emissions still rising. i think what’s been particularly interesting from the beginning of caught that he has been the error of defiance amongst leaders and particularly the presidency of the top. really talking about how progress has been made since the parents agreement was signed 10 years ago. and a lot of uh, very clear uh, messaging that’s when not currently acting fast enough to reduce emissions. but there’s also acknowledgement that the latest update to the nbc synthesis report that tallies what countries latest climate plans add up to shows that there will now be at least a 12 percent reduction on 2019 levels by 2035 in terms of global greenhouse gas emissions, which was not anything near what we were predicting

11:21 pm

a few years ago. so countries that he had to decide how they’re going to recognize that progress. but also how they’re going to work together, despite where they might be some push back from the countries like the us, where countries to hodge hanging up here, i’m going to work together to accelerate climate action so that we can increase the gaps to the emission reductions needed to really prevent the west climate impact. so did you say a 20 percent reduction because everything that i’ve been reading tells me that shows on production problems, a 12 with a 12 percent reduction. but all my reading today tells me that emissions are increasing a terribly emissions are still increasing. that’s right. by 2035. scientists can now predict that the, the, the actions that governments have committed to will result in a reduction of 12 percent by 2035. so over the next 10 years, however, us so right at the moment if emissions are still rising,

11:22 pm

so the action that we’re taking just isn’t fast enough. and that’s why we need countries and businesses and some national governments to come together here at the cost to agree how they’re going to address those gaps in action together. let’s point something as who the rest goes in these talks, if i can put it like that, which the countries deliberately dragging bags and deals and holding back more on fishes progress. i would say that a lot of different opinions from countries coming into the talks. we’ve seen push back from different countries on different parts of the agenda here, the cops and not just talking about how to reduce emissions, which some countries who have perhaps oil dependent economies are less inclined to move fast on. that also about addressing the issues of how to mobilize finance, particularly for developing countries to invest in new technologies or to reduce that vulnerability to climate change, invest in singles and bridges. all of that. and it’s probably really, really,

11:23 pm

really if it be, is the oil dependent economies that are holding progress back at the moment i would say that that’s a bit of an old sites not quite ready to take the next steps that we already, everybody told me is holding on is, i’m sorry, i’m just, i’m trying to just just totally get a clear answer. then you don’t, you’re saying that all sides are holding this up. this doesn’t sound like a particularly productive. i’m sense of meetings or the purpose of these cops is to reach a compromise amongst a 195 different countries. the us hasn’t turned up here, so we have a 194 different countries. they all come here with very different interests that they want to defend. we are seeing some of the oil dependent economies tried to delay the action and the conversations that can be had here on how to reduce

11:24 pm

emissions. vasta. we’ve got for example, you’re pushing strongly for the cup to agree how countries will reduce that gap in emissions reduction that the latest round of nbc is showing the going to the left, which i’m, i seeing other countries less thing aside for example, saudi arabia, less inclined to agree with, with that approach, but at the same time we’re seeing vulnerable developing countries really want to have more discussions on climate finance. and that’s where some of the developed countries uh, less inclined to agree on how to really accelerate those conversations. understood how well the, the us to engage shouldn’t be missed at this meeting. in the us has always been a powerhouse of the top negotiations. sometimes for ambition, sometimes not for ambition. and you can, you can feel the vacuum of that gravity that the us usually brings to the

11:25 pm

negotiations in the hallways here. so what we have seen is other countries really stepping up to show some of that leadership, including the likes of china, but also the european countries really pushing strongly for the world to agree here how to combinations fast us. so the us presence of the lack of us present to this is definitely being felt, but that is still a 194 countries here trying to work together on this problem is the best interest figure that the chinese, the well, the biggest pollute to showing the leadership at this conference in the absence of the will 2nd biggest polluter. it just shows that this is where the economy is moving. this is rather small, that’s uh on ensuring jobs growth in your country, ensuring the safety of your communities. and you can see that demonstrated by the almost competition of a who’s going to be the, the biggest leader of the,

11:26 pm

the kind of the discussions here in cops. and unfortunately for the us, that’s not going to be that they are pushing back. can i ask you, can we finish with 2 questions? one? it come 1st, they deliver as well, meaningful outcome. what do we think is the most plausible one? what? what count as a clear failure, as we’ve seen, a strong push from president lola brazil for this cop to a 3 for example, a road map on how to transition away from fossil fuels and a road map on how to end deforestation. there is a strong pushes that wednesday and coming from the presidency. i’m as a good chance that countries could still come together and agree something like that. out of pop that see if there is no response to the gap in admission to adoption, that the current nbc is the best with coming out of cops 30. that would be

11:27 pm

a disappointing waste of the opportunity of having all those countries and all those businesses who want to drive more action, all those sub national governments. he wants tribal action on the ground here. and by then thank you for to see that. so i think sandra alexandra scott from echo climate. thank you. and that was the day you can follow the team on the social media at dw use latest headlines at coast dw dot com, old a d w a good. the,

11:28 pm

the calico crayfish is an effective killer and is on a mission to destroy a whole bio totes in germany. how this happens to be done on the for the next on dw, indonesia screen is preaching against the door station. so the panels on

11:29 pm

most screws cops, indonesia is on the verge of an environmental revolution. the goal to make all science of worship, c. o 2 neutral by 2060 moses lead to change, and the rest of the country knows that in 60 minutes on d, w. the name is the polls bag said. thank you so much for joining in. welcome to don’t hold bad. a lot of people do that as soon about paying a loud noise would have been nosy. b like good. everyone to king. check out the award winning called call. call back today just

11:30 pm

to have a site and make the right decision to dw new on instagram. follow the calico cree fish are voracious and reproducing record speed. the non native species now threatens local wildlife in germany, where tens of thousands can live in a single small pond. kansas invasive species still be stopped or will crayfish continue to spread throughout germany? i’m. why is a calico creek fish such a threat to biodiversity? one factor how quickly they can reproduce like here.

0 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on November 10, 2025