6:02 am

as the 40 days of deadlock, democrats break rungs to join the republicans saying it was the only way to unfreeze food dates and health care benefits. republicans control the white house, the senate, and the house. this was as far as they would go as part of the shut down talk. this was the only deal on the tape. but other democrats, same washington side of the 5 isn’t over. also coming up high level resignations have to britain’s b, b. c of the editing of donald trump. speech. look at the accusations of bias and accountability in the mainstream media. my step down over the weekend because the buck stops with me. but i’d like to make one thing very clear. did you see these notes institutionally 5 the

6:03 am

i’m feel welcome to the day and we stopped in the united states. we have as now hope that the longest government shut down on record could be about 2. and that’s after several democrats in the centers back to republican funding bill and a rat. we can section about the compromise still needs to be approved by lawmakers in the house of representatives. the historic shut down has left workers without pay and disrupted essential services. on this vote, the gays are 60 in the naser 43 fifths of the senate, duly chosen, and sworn. having voted in the affirmative. the motion upon reconsideration is agreed to sent in to the us government shut down is now inside after the senate voted to advance a bill to restore federal funding through january cortez mass. the stalemate was broken by 8 democrats who agreed to the jail, even though it admits their parties, key demand,

6:04 am

extending affordable health care subsidies. a vote on that will now be held in december. democrats who split with their party defended their reasoning humor. one is to make sure that the government is functioning so that our kids eat so that our elderly citizens eats so that our air traffic controllers can get some sleep and our money, the shut down, which began october 1st is the longest in us history. it’s also shaping up to be the most damaging economically federal workers aren’t being paid and food aid for millions of americans has been suspended. air traffic has also been disrupted, with thousands of slides canceled and delayed due to staff shortages. which they said that wasn’t happening. yeah, because we need, especially during the holidays, we need these people to work so that we can have a good holiday friends and an air traffic control. so yes, yes,

6:05 am

we need them. i’m under worried again. we have plans. we make sense based on the flights that we buy. so it worries me then maybe we can use a play, then lose our jobs. the shut down could end this week, but several hurdles must be cleared. that includes opposition from democratic senators who could delay its passage us while the senate moves towards a final vote. house speaker mike johnson has been telling lawmakers to hurry back to washington, after keeping the chain box of sessions since september. you know, wants to vote on the do as quickly as possible and be blamed democrats for the shut down, but the cold, shameful, and needless but house democrats say they will continue the fight of a healthcare funding. it appears to us this morning that our long national nightmare is finally coming to an end, and we are grateful for that. we applaud the 7 senate democrats and one independent senator who did the right thing they, they decided to put principal over their,

6:06 am

their personal politics. and in my, my urgent plea of all my colleagues in the house. and that means every democrat in the house is to, to think carefully pray. and finally do the right thing will continue to wage this fight. no matter what comes over to us. from the united states senate, we will sit down with any republicans, any time, any place, anywhere in order to find a bipartisan path forward. but we’re not down with them my way or the highway approach to governance. that’s failed. the american people so is the longer shut down in us history likely to end this week is political analysts, but as format, i mean, but i think it very much looks this way. there has been the 60 to 40 boat in the summit, i guess the whole still needs to vote on it. there are a couple afraid instead of suited to be taken,

6:07 am

but it looks like the momentum is on the side of passing and overcoming the government shuttle to democrats didn’t get what they wanted, which was the health care subsidies, the tax credits on to you. um the affordable care act that’s to run out at the end of the year. but on the other hand of that you, you also didn’t get every single one that i wanted to basically shut down or have you reduce the impact of the government to the comfortability office, which didn’t succeed in doing the federal layoffs or being reversed. the money is going to be paid back to the workers. there will be a folder, as we heard on, on the exception of the tax credits in december. so yes, a compromise that’s been the phone. but um, the tricky one of us present donald trump base, threatening the b b. c with a $1000000000.00 lawsuit. if it was his lawyer say, what defamatory edits to a spring she gave just before the 2021 us capital rides,

6:08 am

the british broadcast that has admitted to using the misleading edits and issued an apology. the scandal has prompted the resignations of the bbc’s top executive and its news chief the bbc is facing an unprecedented leadership crisis. director general team davey and news chief debra to and as of both resigned following accusations of editorial bias in the organization. the crisis centers on the linked internal memo that flagged on to trump bias in the bbc’s coverage of last year’s us election. most damaging was how the panorama program edited a speech by the us president, making it appear he and signed to the january 6 capital riots. it was that it was outgoing news chief deborah tennis insist the mistakes do not imply bias. are set down over the weekends because the buck stops with me. but i’d like to make one

6:09 am

thing very clear. did you see me is not institutionally biased. that’s why it’s a well most trusted needs provider. the chair of the bbc’s board apologized and elected to parliament, calling the incident an error of judgement. we had commissioned respect to how well we’ve covered the us elections. and that was quite a substantial piece of research. and just for the sake of out quite a full page that the overall conclusion was that redone extremely was properly impartially because of a job. they what areas of concern of which the panorama was 1. 9 hindsight, it would have been better to go back to the idea. but we did many around the world rely on the bbc for impartial news, which is regulated by its own charter. but ultimately, the broadcaster is funded by the public and has to maintain that trust by thursday,

6:10 am

the reputation of the paving say as thing tony. because your role in the baby, so you for impartiality. i don’t think um the policy side shows the impartial reporting on. so what would events? yeah, the same that was gone, not go see supplement. so we made mistakes. i mean, things do have, this goes from his head to produce the air in many ways. the bbc now has to replace its leadership to keep it focused on covering the news rather than becoming the story. sonya soda is a newspaper columnist on the broadcast that she joins us from the welcome to data you. i’m was this the right outcome giving it was the it was the bite thing to happen to, to such senior executives, the director general and the corporations had of news that they stepped down over

6:11 am

the arrows that would clearly not vasquez and made much lower down the hierarchy using kids rights that senior bbc executives take responsibility for iris mistakes. editorial bias at the bbc because the end of the day, they are accountable for cope the culture and the institutional rules and culture in which mistakes happen. so i do think that it’s important of every is accountability, however, that the issues go much further than the one pound of rama documented tray which appeared to splice together. donald trump speaking at 2 different moments in time to make it, if i keep said something, pe happen, the need to memorize the bbc board also covers allegations about bias and then i could impartiality in a number of other barriers. i think the worrying thing is,

6:12 am

is that we’re seeing these high profile resignations, but even it says resignations have happened, the people resigning, but it will say that bbc chair has said that we made some mistakes, but we don’t accept that that’s an issue in culture and we don’t accept that there are issues with impartiality at the b, b, c. and for me, that is too defensive because it’s a buyout holding impartiality that the bbc can a author. it’s critics interesting that this tied to a had over this panorama of his documentary program about donald trump. donald trump, a political phenomenon that has had lots of news organizations scratching their heads about how much of what emanates from the wide. how does these news and how much you might just cold noise? and i guess you believe that the, the bbc is just decided, but it’s on the trunk. i mean, i think the bigger issues. right. so i think it was a very agree, just editorial era. this editing of this documentary,

6:13 am

i think the bigger issues around impartiality around at the, to reference in the memo, say reporting of israel, gaza. i’m reporting that the conflict between women’s rights and trend twice in the u. k. they to, to the main hope, be contested social issues in the u. k. i think that was good evidence presented in that memo that the bbc has let us down to impartiality slip say for example, on the issue of trends, right? space is women’s rights. it absolutely looks like it’s take one side in that debate, threats reporting. it has no rep present to the device perspective. the exist in the k o my in a lot of it’s probably bombing on its own right now. and that is really helping them out to me and told me the impartiality. this is something that the but the bbc as a news organization. i mean the many others argue about endlessly for hours and hours and hours. and i think the bbc talks about what it goes, do you, impartiality,

6:14 am

you talk about the need for a diverse day of use, but sometimes not always an argument to be settled that if, if you’re having a discussion about climate change, it doesn’t mean to say that you necessarily have to have a climate denial ext uh on the site and program it it if you have a program about one side of an argument doesn’t necessarily follow that. you have the, the opposite view on that same program so long as it’s represented, somewhere within the output does not work of the issues with impartiality, all around climate, the issues around contested debates where there was a diversity of each of them. e k, on the debate on sex and gender, for example. the majority of the british public believe that people should live in that, that, that people are free to sort of identify as a one that, that men should not be able to self identify in to women spaces, services on schools. the bbc has taken a starting point,

6:15 am

a contested minority by make believe that it is right. that button should be able to self identify into those spaces rough. for example, when you go to the, what we don’t need to do, isn’t it really suggested, but what, what is important? take your point. no, let me, let me just tell you what i’m. i’m, but what i’m, where we are now access is in your answer that this is not to assess old issues. so if it’s, if the issue is not settled, then you as far as your concerned both sides of the argument needs to be presented at the same time in order for that impartiality to, to happen. i get that. i just want to take a step 3, even need to think about that. i’m to donald trump now is threatening legal action over the best best program in the space added. how do you believe the bbc should respond with criticism, shifts from public argument into legal quite as i legal intimidation when it will

6:16 am

have to defend itself? so that’s how the legal system works. but it’s a great shame. it was a very agree just our, i’m, i think it’s a great shame that the bbc is hunted, is krycek. so we’re definitely people. i’m a supporter of public service broadcasting. i’m a support at the bbc, but i can see that there are issues i wanted leadership to tackle them. it’s really disappointing when the bbc hundreds gifts to a pilot. so the bbc here will to bring it down like best one. and trump says to me, isn’t the finest the bbc. and so how damaging van, do you think that this scandal, if i’m cold about, has been to the bbc’s claim to be the world’s most trusted news? brand? i think you this damaging and i don’t think it’s about just the trump document j. i think it’s about the, on the issues like israel, gaza on sex agenda, that all clear issues with impartiality. and some people might say, well, these are just a couple of issues. most of the bbc started us to can input output is high quality

6:17 am

and it’s impartial. and i would agree with that. the problem is, if you’ve got the bbc not sticking to impartiality on some of the best contested issues of all time, the public see that they undermine support for the trust and the bbc’s output as a whole. that isn’t fair when bbc john les and it’s not that was the public. so there was a real culture that she had with the new leadership, needs to get a grant. it needs to say that this is what impartiality means and it needs to say to it style, you’re very welcome to have to pass the opinions on these contested debates that they need to stay possible. they comp be allowed to shape bbc need. it outputs the extent that things get miss reported, or to the extent that certain perspectives in the debate about expected held by the majority of brits or not committed in bbc output. thanks for joining us. as sonya sonya soda, newspaper columnist and broadcaster the

6:18 am

science is clear, we come unless spring temperatures back down to $1.00 degrees celsius of any temporary overshoot. limiting is not a strategy. we need solutions. well that was you in climate change time and stay unless they fell to the un climate conference got underway. in brazil, the stakes are unusually high. this year, 10 years after the paris agreement was reached and the world is not on track to meet its targets. current policies point towards roughly $2.00 degrees of roaming. that’s well above the one and a half degree limit. the government’s signed up to as to the fact that this is that they will 2nd biggest that c o 2 inmates of the united states, the state of weiss, and these once again withdrawing from the power steel and his leadership gap as he must, as developing nations demand increased funding the coast revise of temperatures,

6:19 am

floods, droughts, and rising sea levels of issues. host brazil is pushing a new tropical forest protection fund. item cubic ward countries that preserve right in forests and pain lines, those that don’t. so we’ve global politics so fractured brazil’s president and really nice to let the silver said. now what’s the time to fight back against climate change? the now corporate culture 30, it will be the cup of truth and i had at the, in the age of misinformation, those who seek to a skew, the truth, reject them, not totally scientific evidence, but also the progress of multilateralism that they control algorithms. so hatred and spread, feel like they attack institutions, science and universities. it is time to inflict a new defeat on the denial. so it may be for tomorrow, but they’re all thought, oh, they’ve got the alexandra scott to senior climate diplomacy exports at the time in

6:20 am

time it’s a change think tank a code climate. welcome to the w. y a down of goods flying thousands of miles around the world to present for this meeting if the target on being matched and emissions still rising. i think it’s been particularly interesting from the beginning of caught that he had been the error of defiance amongst leaders and particularly the presidency of the top. really talking about how progress has been made since the parents agreement was signed 10 years ago. there’s a lot of very clear messaging that’s when not currently acting fast enough to reduce emissions. but there’s also acknowledgement that the latest update to the nbc synthesis report that tallies what countries latest climate plans add up to shows that there will now be at least a 12 percent reduction on 2019 levels by 2035 in terms of global greenhouse gas

6:21 am

emissions, which was not anything near what we were predicting a few years ago. so countries that he had to decide how they’re going to recognize that progress. but also how they’re going to work together, despite where they might be some push back from the countries like the us where countries to hard standing up here going to work together to accelerate climate action so that we can increase the gaps to the emission reductions needed to really prevent the worst time it impacts. so did you say a 20 percent reduction because everything that i’ve been reading tells me that it shows all reduction problems. a 12 with a 12 percent reduction. but all my reading today tells me that emissions are increasing are currently emissions are still increasing. that’s right. by 2035. scientists can now predict that the, the, the actions that governments have committed to will result in a reduction of 12 percent by 2035. so over the next 10 years, however,

6:22 am

us so right at the moment if emissions are still rising, so the action that we’re taking just isn’t fast enough. and that’s why we need countries and businesses and some national governments to come together here at the cost to agree how they’re going to address those gaps in action together. let’s point something as who the rest goes in these talks, if i can put it like that, which the country is deliberately dragging bags and deals and holding button more, i’m vicious progress. i would say there’s a lot of different opinions from countries coming into the talks. we’ve seen push back from different countries on different parts of the agenda here, the cops and not just talking about how to reduce emissions, which some countries who have perhaps oil dependent economies are less inclined to move fast on. that also about addressing the issues of how to mobilize finance, particularly for developing countries to invest in new technologies or to reduce

6:23 am

that vulnerability to climate change, invest in singles and bridges and all of that. and it’s probably really, really, really if it be, is the oil depends into economies that are holding progress back at the moment i would say that that’s a bit of all sides. not quite ready to take the next steps that we already everybody told is holding partners. i’m sorry, i’m just, i’m trying to just just trying to get a clear answer. then you don’t. you’re saying that all sides are holding this up. this doesn’t sound like a particularly productive set of meetings. the purpose of these cops is to reach a compromise amongst a 195 different countries. the us hasn’t turned up here, so we have a 194 different countries. they all come here with very different interests that they want to defend. we are seeing some of the oil dependent economies tried to

6:24 am

delay the action and the conversations that can be had here on how to reduce emissions. vasta. we’ve got, for example, you’re pushing strongly for the cup to agree how countries will reduce that gap in emissions reduction that the latest round of nbc is showing the going to the left, which am i seeing other countries less thing aside for example, saudi arabia, less inclined to agree with, with that approach, but at the same time we’re seeing vulnerable developing countries really want to have more discussions on climate finance. and that’s where some of the developed countries uh, less inclined to agree on how to really accelerate those conversations. understood how well the, the us to engage shouldn’t be missed at this meeting. in the us has always been a powerhouse of the top negotiations. sometimes for ambition, sometimes not for ambition. and you can,

6:25 am

you can feel the vacuum of that gravity that the us usually brings to the negotiations in the hallways here. so what we have seen is other countries really stepping up to show some of that leadership, including the likes of china, but also the european countries really pushing strongly for the world to agree here how to combinations fast us. so the us presence of the lack of us present to this is definitely being felt, but that is still a 194 countries here trying to work together on this problem is your best interest figure that the chinese, the well biggest pollute to showing the leadership at this conference in the absence of the will 2nd biggest polluter. it just shows that this is where the economy is moving. this is we have a spot that saw on ensuring jobs, price in your country, ensuring the safety of your communities. and you can see that demonstrated by the

6:26 am

almost competition of a who’s going to be the biggest leader of the kind of the discussions here in comp . and unfortunately for the us that’s not going to be that they are pushing back. can i ask you, can we finish with 2 questions a? well, it comes 1st. the delivers one meaningful outcome. what do we think it’s the most can. there is a strong pushes that was the, and coming from the presidency. i’m as a good chance that countries could still come together and agree something like that out of pop that see if there is no response to the gap in admission to adoption. that the current nbc is the best with coming out of cops 30. that would be a disappointing waste of the opportunity of having all those countries and all those businesses who want to drive more action, all those sub national governments. he wants tribal action on the ground here in

6:27 am

balance. thank you for to hear. so that’s alexandra alexandra scott. from echo climate. thank you. and that was the day you can follow the team on the social media at dw use latest headlines. of course, the w dot com or the dw, have a good the

6:28 am

we, the programs that the students, the hard core science that they need to solve, environmental and climate change problems. but also how to connect with the school of environments and sustainability in the south spring dilute who is trying to answer a fundamental question. turn green jobs saves the planets while also making a profit. eco, india. next on dw queues as guilty of crimes against the rock brands brands against too many here they started world war 2 and committed genocide a 2 years ago. the well to develop the heat is on trial. how much have we actually

6:29 am

done from history pulse and they have been 60 minutes d, w, the sometimes it’s hard to find what you’re looking for. but we’ve got something for you. the world is looking towards present 10 cops. i see find solutions for the biggest challenge of all time. failure is not an option. we need more research, unbiased, and factual reporting and constructive ideas. we can only save the future together because of the needs together. we see the

6:30 am

sometimes motivation comes from a profit from a noble idea. sometimes it comes from the frustration or disappointment. hello and welcome. i’m sorry, got the body and you’re watching equal india for real. a change to happen. motivation needs to come from within from a place that is authentic and dp fence. when that happens at actions stretch beyond our own lives and thoughts, communities inspire others. i’m.

0 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on November 11, 2025