9:00 pm

and the sale of opium took on collazo proportions and lead to the horrible depths of millions of ordinary chinese. the welcome across the bullhorn. some are all things are considered on peter lavelle, trump and nato, to prepare for war against russia. the us president is called for resumption of new killer testing, and apparently tomahawks will be sent to ukraine. this only adds to the war hysteria in europe. also, it is when and not if the u. s. attempts were seen change in venezuela to discuss these issues and more on joined by my guess towards samuel we in budapest, he’s a pod cast with a gaggle which can be found on youtube and locals. and here in moscow, we crossed to mark’s level that he’s an international relations and security

9:01 pm

analysts. a gentleman cross type rules and effect. that means you can jump any time you want, and i always appreciate it. let’s kick it off with mark here. over the last 10 days, 2 weeks we’ve seen a significant shift. at least i interpret this significant shift in the trump administration’s view of the conflict in ukraine. it seems a form is contradictory, a form of disengagement, but engagement and you know, i said in my introduction it looks like it’s not a 100 percent. sure. it’s nothings 100 percent. sure. it seems like that tomahawks will be sending out that, that, that is significant in itself. it indicates escalation is, this is his policy. what trump, what obama famously called, leaving from behind now marks. um, i think you’re right that there is a, you know, obvious contradictions in the trump administration’s policy towards ukraine. almost certainly because there are contradictions within the administration itself that there is in think are in agreement. and trump seems to waffle back and forth

9:02 pm

between different factions. within his own administration, and the blob dictating events in ukraine almost, you know, with wind currents, you know, he’s, he’s talking to, to prevailing political wins. and he seems far more concerned about how he is perceived domestically with regards to the conflict in ukraine. then with any uh, concerted foreign policy vision about how to move forward with the conflict. but there has been enough whispering in his ear, evidently that he, if he wants to de escalate, then he’s going to have to escalate. because the russians do not accept american terms to and the conflict because, well, for us is still playing the, the game that, that there are some kind of neutral 3rd party arbiter to this through, you know, rather than, you know, the principal instigators and,

9:03 pm

and participants in the proxy war which they had previously admitted against the russia. but i don’t think russia is overly concerned with any battle field or strategic effect of a tomahawk. it’s a 19 eighties, top gun weapon and, and russian air defense and electronic warfare have adapted and taken neutralized far more modern and stealthy storm shadows. scalps attack them’s ground lounge, small diameter bombs. you you name it in. western media is had to admit it is more of a political problem, because this will be as trump himself admitted us personnel in firing missiles, firing cruise missiles into russia. and the, the biggest problem here is how russia will politically be forced to respond to that. yeah, in charge, you know, since we gotten used to the man in the white house, i think it’s,

9:04 pm

it’s almost obvious to ask the question he can get a wind. so he’s not interested or is not as interested because i agree with mark he’s it’s, he’s very much concerned with public opinion at home. he seems to be and me, you guys can disagree with me if you want. seems a bit tacitly just going along with the europeans now know when you can’t when lead from behind george. all right, i think that’s right. then i think really a crucial moment was in alaska because i think it’s is becoming clear that the russians did come to alaska with a and they had a decision to make such a substantial concessions. and this was revealed by say, gala overall in a recent interview with a hung gary and a new stations was said that they were under the assumption that a, a piece plan that had been put forward by steve went go for obviously speaking on

9:05 pm

behalf of trump that they were going to negotiate that in anchorage. and the russians are saying, yeah, but this is the bait a basis plan, which we can agree. and that’s why the russians keep going back from back. i say we have agreements in the anchorage, this is a, this is what, what we had the, this was the basis of a deal. and then chrome just, we will go off the anchorage the, you know, issue the low statesman saying, hey, we’re very close to a deal with very close to the agreement, then went back with it. and then you just simply do with all those europeans. obviously panicking about what happened and i encourage they rushed to washington within 48 hours and then trump went along with it. and the, and that nolan’s, you know, in the sense that, you know, trump’s policy and ukraine, i think has now been determined. i mean, i think he is now thrown in his love with the europeans, his phone, him is all the native. but up until then, and then you know, with this as an august year still been open to, you know,

9:06 pm

working out some kind of an agreement with russia that ukraine would not have liked that nature would not have liked. but he would then have a bench that cheve the wind. now we called achieve a win, because now he’s going to step on this policy with, you know, who this escalation with these sanctions against the rest of the world. giants, me because was assigned them the. but it was a, that’s all my thoughts. he’s now embarked them an escalation. just going to be very difficult to get off of that and go back to what was actually on the table at average. yeah, but yeah, how much is this different, the mark now that is, this is not in search of any kind of piece in ukraine. this is reverting back to the binding policy of inflicting a strategic defeat on russia. how. how is the trump policy now really any different? i mean, the rhetoric and changing his mind flips pop, email, that all, that’s all big den. but if you look at the, the, the overriding goal,

9:07 pm

it’s the same as the bind ministration. they’re not going to move in in ukraine, so they have to defeat russia. i mean, this is the contradiction. go ahead, mark. yeah, i don’t actually think that there’s any real hope or a goal of infecting a strategic the feet on russia. it’s more avoiding, as long as possible, a strategic defeat for the united states in ukraine, right? it’s not the brand. they believe they can defeat russia. it’s just the, they hope that they can raise the costs and off that russia will not get as much of a defeat of the united states as it might otherwise have got right. that they might come to the table some time earlier on terms closer to the us, even if it’s not on us terms and actually thinking about it. i’m not so sure that this is a policy of leading from behind. the says,

9:08 pm

i don’t think the trump administration is leading anything. i don’t think trump is in charge of his own foreign policy here. if it is true and that, you know, with coff came with a, a, a deal. and the russians said, we can work with this and came to alaska, and then trump talk out out on, um, you know, a, a, a, something that he, himself, or, or his people had presented to the russians. it means he’s not in control. he’s not in control of his own administration. he’s not in control of the blob. the deep stayed at home. he’s certainly not in control of the europeans or the key, every team or the media that is driving things. i don’t know what he’s actually in control and other than his own peer, all social media posts. well, i mean that’s, that’s a very interesting interpretation. and i think we can add a layer. i’ll go to george on this here it, let’s take the marks theory of the case here. if he can control in george can

9:09 pm

disagree obviously be wants, but if he can control, he just wants to leave the per grade. i mean that that’s what he wants to do if he can’t influence the policy when it can cause going to talk about venezuela can’t influence when he comes to ukraine. he’s going to be the leader because he wants it to be all about him. george. i think that’s right about i think that she had 1st started off as those critic of need so that i will, i’m sick of a, you know, they need so it was uh, you know, the, they’re, they’re all a bunch of free load as they’re imposing their problems on us, united so your brain is their problems and allow problem. they don’t do enough for their own defense. and as i was there, he starts off with that. and then he gets persuaded by nato. all right, well if you say so we will spend lots and lots and lots of little money on uh, on our defense, you know, will fiddle the book. so, you know, i will say one and spend it will be to buy american arms that they’re buying american homes, that it says, okay, great, i’m the leader of nato. and i go and i rarely is on later on, they’ve, they roll,

9:10 pm

bringing so much more money uh, to the table. and that gives them a certain weight. and because it says i am revitalized and i don’t, i have reinvent as nato. i, you know, it’s, it’s not a serious consent and he’s happy with the service of the, about the price is that he has to go along with, with a policy which is very different from the one that he was advocating. and remember, he was actually a otherwise correctly at various times during the campaign. then why should rusher pull it up with nato on its borders? they get a, this is obviously a detrimental to their interest. i mean, you know, if i was in that place, i would absolutely say i’m not going to have nato. yeah. but at the still does during the campaign. now it’s just all gone. i just think while i’m sick of a lot in the you know, he’s just yeah me but it, it just means that if he can change it, he wants to be the face of it. okay. that’s what he what? yeah. mark, you know what george said, and, you know, the, you know, would be what we all agree here is it about trump will flip black um,

9:11 pm

flip flop back and forth as long as he’s the center of attention. but in a more serious note mark, this means escalation, and it doesn’t because the given the war hysteria, which is i, i think it’s up to the point of psychotic right now in europe. they are preparing for war. i mean, i think when someone tells you that you should believe the mark and yeah, i mean, they have to be ready for war in europe at some 3 year, 2 years, 3 years, 5 years into the future. although there’s no signs that they are showing any capability to ramp up there. what i don’t know does in scattered little military industrial complexes to mount or anything, and there is no sign that the u. s. is able to ramp up production. uh, for instance of uh, you know, the type of munitions,

9:12 pm

any equipment needed for this conflict, which the pentagon has admitted, they are critically short of pack 3 interceptors, attack ims tomahawks. yes. and others. so, i mean, it’s not like the us can trans for these weapons either. i think that both the united states and europe are facing a degree of imperial overstretch and exhaustion. and they still haven’t come to grips with the limitations of their own military capabilities, much less coming to grips with the new reality of rushes, much greater military capabilities. and they’re all being completely floored by the fact that they’re not the center of the economic world as china has just scroll the entirety of the west and bentham over a barrel in a trade war, that the us started with china and wasn’t prepared for. and the chinese war,

9:13 pm

so they’re really their, their entire identity and conception of their place and the world. and the way the world works has flipped on its head. and i get the sense that they just, they’re living in like trump, like zalinski. the european leaders are living in a delusional space, a reality separate from our own, and they’re just going, i can’t hear you, i can hear you. yeah. well, all it is, is it offensively brushed, is gonna collapse. we just have to wait for it. okay, that’s the world we’re living and gentlemen, i’m going to jump in here. we’re going to go to a short break. and after that short break, we’ll continue our discussion on some. we’ll need to stay with dr. the. do you ever catch yourself questioning more? why do i always power it? every single us state department says a why i always ask, do you condemn us? but never israel. why? i never said, sorry for spreading the the bunk trunk for us or gate hoax. why i support every

9:14 pm

illegal war. the u. s. as launch this century, why i can’t stop lying? the joe biden was young and healthy enough for the presidency. why we ignore our rock bottom ratings and pretend people still want to watch the same old boat. the only reason we’re asking is because oxy generate to this video and made us do it. so you’ll never get answers, at least not from us, the coffee anniversary to r t. i may be in a i, but there’s no way i’m saying that the, the one with the little of so for that’s not the only thing but if i’m not so good and scarred amount from that’s why little do you much really watch the daily words. you darling,

9:15 pm

which isn’t going to it’s the nearest when i go in store and liberal stuff used to live with the dumpster and was told by you born here when you push the issue of the, of them both the model. and what about this to move futile? easy lives, mysterious, and when you go to the 0, is the yeah. post the by the other was like if i use the yeah, i’m just thinking and then you slice that, i mean 58 and i maybe cause it please go ahead and always communicate that. me me through to go up. nothing like mine’s but it just those we have the we have such all push mojitos to yeah, you’re losing a deal in space, but i don’t think he will definitely stays bundle in the tub. the but you move in georgia especially is pretty big. and you see, i’m saying is up with me that’s thrown images. the one in the other will be listening via guns thing. some list of course the movies is always in my hands,

9:16 pm

not old on the side of me, and just want them as i put down for the show seemed wrong. just don’t have to shape house because the engagement equals the trails when so many find themselves will to part we choose to look for common ground the the welcome act across that bullhorn. so we’re all things are considered. i’m detail about your mind. you were discussing some real news. well, what is real here? george is i said, as i said in my introduction,

9:17 pm

it’s but if it’s when the truck open ministration will attempt to machine change and through military force and then and then his way it looked at. that’s the way at least looks right now. if not there. dedicating a lot of resource, military resources for what, what could be a bluff? i don’t tend to think of that way. i think the trump administration thinks of the western hemisphere is distinctly different from the rest of the world. that’s their front yard and backyard, and they feel that they still know a restraint and doing what they want to do because my theory of the cases is him as hemisphere agree, engineering. and then going to start with venezuela. your thoughts, george? i agree with you. i think, you know, we have crossed a, a rubicon and then we’ll kind of know there’s a, something happened here. you know, that there’s a consensus is formed in, uh, washington, you know, florida is, uh, uh, put in place. you know, uh the policymakers. i’m making the most of the statements the, you know about,

9:18 pm

you know, this is, this is what they hoping to achieve. this is the weapons label that we have about disposal. you know, we still exactly the same kind of build up before libya. we rock and you know, at a certain point is going to happen. i mean it’s, it’s just, you know what too far along now to back away. and so i think he’s gonna do it. i agree that this is bob of trump’s idea of um, returning to the monroe doctrine. you know, even though it’s a, it’s totally inappropriate. so you know what the monroe doctrine was about. and i think he sees the uh, toppling of my door as kind of a i’m a great victory in the geo political competition with russia in china. i as these madura as being 5 of the next those roster china iran, north korea, even though he’s the people that i thought i thought it was about an up. it was kim jong on it, but i thought it was, i think, says i thought it was about narco terrorism mark. yeah, i don’t think that that’s

9:19 pm

a, that, that, that 3 text. i mean, it’s been use before and you know, and in previous decades with panama and liquor, og. why and, and i guess, you know, like, like the weapons of mass destruction trotted out in the middle east. this is a, a play book that it has already proven that the media and the public will accept. and i think you’re right that trump sees this at, or trump, and, or people in his administration. i get a sense of that. rubio is driving a lot of this, and i think his, his, you know, um, concerned with getting rid of left this uh, in the western hemisphere. coincides with an american 1st faction that does believe in reasserting control over the western hemisphere here. but they spoke openly, right, that the, you know, the, the travesty here as they see it is that venezuela is in bed with

9:20 pm

their strategic partners. oh, and there’s the oil, the largest proven oil. there’s the oil on, on top of it, right. rubio, war and that, that, you know, that is the justification as he bought it was that e ron was talking to venezuela, about a drone factory. not. i mean, let’s take a look at this here in the united states, all of nato goes into ukraine. they help flip the government there, they build up a powerful military. they have trainers, they are rec, colbert, c, i a base is all on the russian border for covert operations. they rebuild the intelligence agencies. they. uh, they start rebuilding military industrial complex. they start building bases on ukranian society, but russia saying that was the security threat and reacting to it right is, is you know, beyond the pale. however,

9:21 pm

if venezuela talks to someone on the other side of the world about a drone factory, then that is justification for em very well if you’re a country that’s under sanction, you’ll talk to anybody that will talk back to you. ok. but george, you know, we’ve been here before, at least kind of ok. we member that one. why don’t i mean, easily forgettable. figure that a 2019 a coup attempt which was keystone cops. i mean, i mean it was really just a botched operation in for all and for all of us to watch, is it different this time? because the venezuelan, that i talked to, they won’t say a 100 percent cuz who, who can say 100 percent, but majority co proof because he still has the military and the security forces on his side, you know, to, to 1019, it didn’t work. why will it work in 2025? george is my only knowledge. i mean, who knows how much money they gotta pull renters? i mean people can be bought and i,

9:22 pm

i’m assuming they got to just keep applying pressure and pressure against my there . are they gonna problem? and so the launch missiles always taking out now go factories and whatever, taking out all the military bases that facilitate the, the exports of narcotics. and i think they go to just the bed in the hope that somebody within the madura circle will turn on him and deliver him up to the united states. i don’t think they’re going to seriously think in terms of an invasion. i mean, that’s just very, very heavy and casualties. i mean, i don’t think trump, most of those are country to the country. and once of america start getting killed that, you know, that that’s to comp stuff, phone numbers. i’m going to go through the slot. so i don’t think they want to do that. i think they want to scare nicaragua, and i think they’re just, they’re going to bribe the way into securing this, the regime change. and they’ve got this nobel laureates waiting in the wings.

9:23 pm

there’s no way you know, she, she won the nobel peace prize. i mean, how could you possibly say no to a woman who has won a nobel peace prize? she has to be the leader of uh, venezuela. kind of goes down the road. i mean, trumpet is, has impatience. he wants to get rid of, uh, 2, but i mean, he thinks he can solve this cuban problem once and for, oh, yeah, but market and easy air said been done well, what? well, okay, let’s take the ferry, you know they’ll, they’ll be some general that will turn on massaro hand them over to the americans, get the $50000000.00 bounty, but maybe the general want to stay in power. why would he give it away to this lunatic nobel prize winner? i mean, my point is, you know, you know, the best plans can turn into a disaster in the 1st minute of the conflict. okay. what, what, it’s possible that could be a civil war. you would have a collapse of, of venezuela, the think of the waves of migrants that will affect the entire region oh,

9:24 pm

into the united states, possibly as well. my whole point is that when is it so easy? when does it ever really work out mark? yeah, well i’ll try to have like panama. okay, fine. yeah. it’s never going to be that easy, but they never really think of the consequences either when they do these things. that’s right, actually i, i agree with george, right. this is not a land invasion force that’s, that’s, that’s the day that the trump of ministration doesn’t want them to another vietnam and they will avoid it. right? the c i a is going to do what they’re extremely good at. they are going to attempt to co opt to blackmail to bribe the venezuelan military intelligence. you know, the brass, the military brass, the intelligence, the security forces, the local political officials, they’re very good at this. they did it in a rack in 2003. they did it in libya at the end and tripoli in syria, working with sarah they, they collapse the entire government in less than 2 weeks. any wrong. it wasn’t as

9:25 pm

successful, but they tried the same thing. so this is what we’re going to see here. we’re going to see the c, i a doing the work. we’re going to see. decapitation strikes, you know, with a tomahawks in the air strikes and possibly the insertion of a couple 1000 marines and special forces if it becomes necessary. but they hope to get the local opposition, the other, you know, the middle class, the all the guards, the venezuela, along with what is almost certain to be a few 100 right when columbia and mercenaries that they think that they can achieve regime change, shall we say on the cheap base event as well as low hanging fruit, they couldn’t achieve it in iran, but uh, venezuela is a prize that they can deny russia. yeah. the gentleman who, who, who is of the phrase is famous, but i don’t remember who said it a splendid little boar. i’m thinking of 1898 and cuba. i’m gonna try to put you on

9:26 pm

the spot. i don’t remember who said it, but george splendid little, splendid, little more. well, i think that’s the theory i think is going to be a lot more complicated than that. but i think i says what we’re talking earlier, trump thinks that he can get a when and he gets a, i’ve done some things that my previous as were unable to though, you know, george w bush tried to get rid of this regime obama buying me. i have pulled it off, but i think that’s why the, his ambition is ultimately, you know, regime change in cuba. so it’s a he this, as they say, it will be historic legacy. i finally removed to this communist regime of, for a long time as so, you know, what do you know, jack kennedy? couldn’t do. i did, i think that’s, that’s he’s going and then he thinks that the system will be some grade geostrategic victory over roughly. that’s fine. this is tom playing risk here, mark, i don’t know how many of our viewers know the board game it was for my child. so

9:27 pm

frankly, i think risk is, is a bit beyond trump level. i think he is more playing poker. you know, but, and you know, because most of this is, is bluff and bluster. i mean, this is a lot of, it is pressure campaign, right? us bombers doing mach bombing, runs on caracas. that’s a, that’s a pressure campaign, right? he’s trying to pressure, you know, the, the venezuelan military and political lead even as the c i a is working on them behind the phones. and we noticed we had to a p run a story about how there was a c. i attempt to co opt to buy out to bribe my door rose own pilot and get him to bring my door road to the united states. you know, to be abducted to be, to be kidnapped. and they played along with him for 6 months, thousands of tax money disney world. everything was promised to him in his family.

9:28 pm

and in the end he said no, but does, does that mean that everyone else will say, we don’t know, we don’t know the c, i is good at this, but they’re not perfect, right? they succeeded in syria. they failed any ron? so, you know, we’re going to find out how it plays out. um, i think we’re probably going to wait about a week until the u. s. s. a. gerald ford, aircraft, carrier steaming on its way, gets into position because that will assist with the, the long range strikes that are going to be meant to pressure and facilitate all of the c. i a covert work to. well, george, we have about 3035 seconds here. it’s explained to me how this is america. first. it has of course, that there’s nothing at all to do with them. america 1st and the but what he has done here is on how he’s managed to revive some primal ins. things along his base. emily?

9:29 pm

yeah. you know i was the val rough. right. exactly. going back years and years. i was this the sort of thing that you use to oppose the think you have to call me less than the western hemisphere. so yeah, yeah, you’re yeah, you’re right now. yeah, this doesn’t count as a regime change. well, this doesn’t cause a far and interference. yeah. it doesn’t count and this one doesn’t count. okay, we’ll see if it counts. that’s all the time. we have one, a think, my guess in budapest, in here in moscow. and of course i’m gonna think i’d be worse for watching us here at r t c. and next time, remember, cross stop rules the the a hi, my name is kim, i’m the most of,

9:30 pm

i’m the grandson of the late come up and also who was leader of egypt and revolution. the 2nd president of the republic of egypt, the na said it was a man who stood firm against colonialism and phone and domination. and so to find partners who respect the age of silver, one of those partners was the soviet union. egyptian and soviet relations begun to rise to its permanent type after age of fatal thing and onto agreements with the united states. therefore, negotiate included in arms views on fed and favorable terms. let’s take a look here. then unimportant ally of the soviet union event triggered the strain between egypt and wisdom countries and brought closer relations between egypt and associates. after the 1956 aggression, however, the complete egypt and the world during the soviet union, the united states with us is there any proxy or interested in the reason to inhabit the rich empire, the region for the switches being the land. lots of ways, fossil fuels or even go it was perhaps as productive and headed to the west and expansionism among other.

0 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on November 3, 2025