Title:SurveyBench: How Well Can LLM(-Agents) Write Academic Surveys?
Abstract:Academic survey writing, which distills vast literature into a coherent and insightful narrative, remains a labor-intensive and intellectually demanding task. While recent approaches, such as general DeepResearch agents and survey-specialized methods, can generate surveys automatically (a.k.a. LLM4Survey), their outputs often fall short of human standards and there lacks a rigorous, reader-aligned benchmark for thoroughly revealing their deficiencies. To fill the gap, we propose a fine-grained, quiz-driven evaluation framework SurveyBench, featuring (1) typical survey topics source from rece…
Title:SurveyBench: How Well Can LLM(-Agents) Write Academic Surveys?
Abstract:Academic survey writing, which distills vast literature into a coherent and insightful narrative, remains a labor-intensive and intellectually demanding task. While recent approaches, such as general DeepResearch agents and survey-specialized methods, can generate surveys automatically (a.k.a. LLM4Survey), their outputs often fall short of human standards and there lacks a rigorous, reader-aligned benchmark for thoroughly revealing their deficiencies. To fill the gap, we propose a fine-grained, quiz-driven evaluation framework SurveyBench, featuring (1) typical survey topics source from recent 11,343 arXiv papers and corresponding 4,947 high-quality surveys; (2) a multifaceted metric hierarchy that assesses the outline quality (e.g., coverage breadth, logical coherence), content quality (e.g., synthesis granularity, clarity of insights), and non-textual richness; and (3) a dual-mode evaluation protocol that includes content-based and quiz-based answerability tests, explicitly aligned with readers’ informational needs. Results show SurveyBench effectively challenges existing LLM4Survey approaches (e.g., on average 21% lower than human in content-based evaluation).
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2510.03120 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2510.03120v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.03120 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Zhaojun Sun [view email] [v1] Fri, 3 Oct 2025 15:49:09 UTC (5,174 KB)