Title:Detecting Semantic Clones of Unseen Functionality
Abstract:Semantic code clone detection is the task of detecting whether two snippets of code implement the same functionality (e.g., Sort Array). Recently, many neural models achieved near-perfect performance on this task. These models seek to make inferences based on their training data. Consequently, they better detect clones similar to those they have seen during training and may struggle to detect those they have not. Developers seeking clones are, of course, interested in both types of clones. We confirm this claim through a literature review, identifying three practical clone detection tasks in which the mode…
Title:Detecting Semantic Clones of Unseen Functionality
Abstract:Semantic code clone detection is the task of detecting whether two snippets of code implement the same functionality (e.g., Sort Array). Recently, many neural models achieved near-perfect performance on this task. These models seek to make inferences based on their training data. Consequently, they better detect clones similar to those they have seen during training and may struggle to detect those they have not. Developers seeking clones are, of course, interested in both types of clones. We confirm this claim through a literature review, identifying three practical clone detection tasks in which the model’s goal is to detect clones of a functionality even if it was trained on clones of different functionalities. In light of this finding, we re-evaluate six state-of-the-art models, including both task-specific models and generative LLMs, on the task of detecting clones of unseen functionality. Our experiments reveal a drop in F1 of up to 48% (average 31%) for task-specific models. LLMs perform on par with task-specific models without explicit training for clone detection, but generalize better to unseen functionalities, where F1 drops up to 5% (average 3%) instead. We propose and evaluate the use of contrastive learning to improve the performance of existing models on clones of unseen functionality. We draw inspiration from the computer vision and natural language processing fields where contrastive learning excels at measuring similarity between two objects, even if they come from classes unseen during training. We replace the final classifier of the task-specific models with a contrastive classifier, while for the generative LLMs we propose contrastive in-context learning, guiding the LLMs to focus on the differences between clones and non-clones. The F1 on clones of unseen functionality is improved by up to 26% (average 9%) for task-specific models and up to 5% (average 3%) for LLMs.
| Comments: | 13 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication (to appear) in the 40th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2025 |
| Subjects: | Software Engineering (cs.SE) |
| ACM classes: | D.2.13 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2510.04143 [cs.SE] |
| (or arXiv:2510.04143v1 [cs.SE] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.04143 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Konstantinos Kitsios [view email] [v1] Sun, 5 Oct 2025 10:45:52 UTC (187 KB)