Abstract:Anti-malware systems rely on sandboxes, hooks, and telemetry pipelines, including collection agents, serializers, and database backends, to monitor program and system behavior. We show that these data-handling components constitute an exploitable attack surface that can lead to denial-of-analysis (DoA) states without disabling sensors or requiring elevated privileges. As a result, we present \textit{Telemetry Complexity Attacks} (TCAs), a new class of vulnerabilities that exploit fundamental mismatches between unbounded collection mechanisms and bounded processing capabilities. Our method recursively spawns child processes to generate specially crafted, deeply nest…
Abstract:Anti-malware systems rely on sandboxes, hooks, and telemetry pipelines, including collection agents, serializers, and database backends, to monitor program and system behavior. We show that these data-handling components constitute an exploitable attack surface that can lead to denial-of-analysis (DoA) states without disabling sensors or requiring elevated privileges. As a result, we present \textit{Telemetry Complexity Attacks} (TCAs), a new class of vulnerabilities that exploit fundamental mismatches between unbounded collection mechanisms and bounded processing capabilities. Our method recursively spawns child processes to generate specially crafted, deeply nested, and oversized telemetry that stresses serialization and storage boundaries, as well as visualization layers, for example, JSON/BSON depth and size limits. Depending on the product, this leads to truncated or missing behavioral reports, rejected database inserts, serializer recursion and size errors, and unresponsive dashboards. In all of these cases, malicious activity is normally executed; however, depending on the examined solution, it is not recorded and/or not presented to the analysts. Therefore, instead of evading sensors, we break the pipeline that stores the data captured by the sensors. We evaluate our technique against twelve commercial and open-source malware analysis platforms and endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions. Seven products fail in different stages of the telemetry pipeline; two vendors assigned CVE identifiers (CVE-2025-61301 and CVE-2025-61303), and others issued patches or configuration changes. We discuss root causes and propose mitigation strategies to prevent DoA attacks triggered by adversarial telemetry.
| Subjects: | Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2511.04472 [cs.CR] |
| (or arXiv:2511.04472v1 [cs.CR] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04472 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Constantinos Patsakis [view email] [v1] Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:45:03 UTC (116 KB)