Abstract:Can classical game-theoretic frameworks be extended to capture the bounded rationality and causal reasoning of AI agents? We investigate this question by extending Causal Normal Form Games (CNFGs) to sequential settings, introducing Sequential Causal Multi-Agent Systems (S-CMAS) that incorporate Pearl’s Causal Hierarchy across leader-follower interactions. While theoretically elegant – we prove PSPACE-completeness, develop equilibrium refinements, and establish connections to signaling theory – our comprehensive empirical investigation reveals a critical limitation: S-CNE provides zero welfare improvement over classical Stackelberg equilibrium across all tested scena…
Abstract:Can classical game-theoretic frameworks be extended to capture the bounded rationality and causal reasoning of AI agents? We investigate this question by extending Causal Normal Form Games (CNFGs) to sequential settings, introducing Sequential Causal Multi-Agent Systems (S-CMAS) that incorporate Pearl’s Causal Hierarchy across leader-follower interactions. While theoretically elegant – we prove PSPACE-completeness, develop equilibrium refinements, and establish connections to signaling theory – our comprehensive empirical investigation reveals a critical limitation: S-CNE provides zero welfare improvement over classical Stackelberg equilibrium across all tested scenarios. Through 50+ Monte Carlo simulations and hand-crafted synthetic examples, we demonstrate that backward induction with rational best-response eliminates any strategic advantage from causal layer distinctions. We construct a theoretical example illustrating conditions where benefits could emerge ($\epsilon$-rational satisficing followers), though implementation confirms that even relaxed rationality assumptions prove insufficient when good instincts align with optimal play. This negative result provides valuable insight: classical game-theoretic extensions grounded in rational choice are fundamentally incompatible with causal reasoning advantages, motivating new theoretical frameworks beyond standard Nash equilibrium for agentic AI.
| Comments: | AAAI 2026 Workshop on Foundations of Agentic Systems Theory |
| Subjects: | Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Other Statistics (stat.OT) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2511.06934 [cs.GT] |
| (or arXiv:2511.06934v1 [cs.GT] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.06934 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Dennis Thumm [view email] [v1] Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:31:43 UTC (23 KB)