Examining how to sustain professional growth in an exponentially accelerating field.
Posted Nov 10 2025
Credit: Collagery
Several months ago, I arrived at the office at 8:45 a.m., sat at my desk, and was about to start my day. The only problem was that I, for the life of me, could not remember my password. This is a bit laughable because for the past year, I had typed that exact password almost daily, sometimes from muscle memory. I had done it at the beginning of that week, all the days before, and even late the previous night. But in that moment, I could not remember the first letter. After about an hour—taking a break, missing a morning meeting, getting locked o…
Examining how to sustain professional growth in an exponentially accelerating field.
Posted Nov 10 2025
Credit: Collagery
Several months ago, I arrived at the office at 8:45 a.m., sat at my desk, and was about to start my day. The only problem was that I, for the life of me, could not remember my password. This is a bit laughable because for the past year, I had typed that exact password almost daily, sometimes from muscle memory. I had done it at the beginning of that week, all the days before, and even late the previous night. But in that moment, I could not remember the first letter. After about an hour—taking a break, missing a morning meeting, getting locked out—I did get back in. This was not just about forgetting a password. It was a wake-up call—a small but telling sign of cognitive overload. As I sat there that morning, staring at my login screen, I realized this memory lapse was symptomatic of something larger: the mental toll of trying to keep pace with the relentless advancement of AI. That period, like most of the year, had been marked by constant effort to stay current—tracking breakthrough papers, integrating new models, adapting to paradigm shifts, all while maintaining regular work responsibilities. And I was not alone. In conversations with colleagues across the AI research and engineering space, a pattern emerged. While we all shared genuine excitement about being in the field during this revolutionary time, there was also an undercurrent of exhaustion—a particular kind of fatigue that comes from trying to match the unprecedented pace of AI advancement. This is what I have come to think of as “AI fatigue”—the collective exhaustion experienced by individuals and organizations in response to the unrelenting pace of AI innovation. The last two years have witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in AI capabilities, marked by the rapid succession of increasingly powerful models from ChatGPT to Claude, Gemini, and beyond. For practitioners, researchers, and organizations in the field, keeping up with the torrent of developments has become a Sisyphean task that warrants careful examination of how we sustain professional growth in an exponentially accelerating field.
AI Fatigue: What Is It?
AI fatigue is the collective exhaustion experienced by individuals and organizations in response to the unrelenting pace of artificial intelligence (AI) advancement. It reflects the mental, emotional, and operational toll of trying to adapt to an unprecedented rate of change that has sustained for a relatively long period (several years) with little/no signs of slowing down. In some way, it is an acknowledgment that the pace of AI is gargantuan and adapting to it has costs that we must all be clearly aware of. The duration of this rapid pace has also been unprecedented, with the release of ChatGPT in November 2022 marking the beginning of this period that sometimes feels like many, many years. The relentless pace of AI advancements creates a treadmill-like environment where professionals struggle to keep up.
The Three Firehoses of AI Progess: Papers, Models, and Announcements
The scale of AI advancement manifests in three concurrent streams of overwhelming progress. First, the research output is staggering—December 2024 alone saw over 21,000 submissions on arXiv,1 with AI-related categories accounting for more than 6,000 papers. Even dedicating four hours daily to reading these papers would cover merely 8% of the published research. Second, the pace of model releases has become relentless, with major updates from industry leaders such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google appearing monthly, alongside a growing collection of more than 1.5 million smaller models on platforms such as HuggingFace.4 Third, these advances catalyze an expanding ecosystem of startups, tools, and hardware innovations, generating a constant stream of announcements that further compounds the challenge of staying current. This three-pronged deluge of information and innovation creates an environment where complete mastery seems increasingly challenging.
Depleted Surge Capacity and Hidden Costs of Adaptation
The concept of surge capacity—a collection of adaptive mental and physical systems humans draw on for short-term survival in acutely stressful situations3,6—helps explain the exhaustion pervading the AI community. Originally discussed in the context of natural disasters and the COVID-19 pandemic, surge capacity is designed for sprint scenarios with clear endpoints. However, the current AI revolution presents a unique challenge: it demands sustained sprint-level engagement with no clear finish line in sight. Maintaining high effort for more than 24 months while processing three simultaneous streams of innovation naturally pushes beyond our adaptive limits, revealing hidden costs across multiple dimensions.
For individual researchers and engineers, these costs manifest in disrupted research cycles and cognitive overload.5 The constant need to update work with new papers and models creates significant mental strain, while the persistent feeling of falling behind breeds anxiety and imposter syndrome, particularly affecting students and early-career researchers.2 The pressure to stay current while maintaining regular responsibilities has fundamentally altered the create-consume balance—many find themselves spending more time processing new developments than advancing their own work. Beyond technical challenges, professionals now shoulder an unprecedented moral responsibility, grappling with the societal implications of potentially transformative AI capabilities.
Organizations face similarly profound adaptational challenges. Engineering teams are caught in accelerated product cycles, managing endless sprints to update existing systems with each major AI release. This sprint fatigue often leads to what I term hype-driven development—organizations racing to implement AI capabilities without proper evaluation of their business needs, driven more by fear of falling behind than by strategic necessity. While some navigate this gracefully, many organizations struggle to balance maintaining existing systems while adapting to rapid innovations.
The ripple effects extend beyond the AI field itself. Adjacent industries including academic disciplines find themselves disrupted, forced to fundamentally rethink their approaches. Educators must redesign curricula and evaluation methods, while various professional fields grapple with integrating AI capabilities into their practice. This cascading adaptation pressure creates a multiplier effect, where the costs of keeping pace compound across the entire technological ecosystem.
Conclusion
The unprecedented pace of AI advancement shows no signs of slowing, making it crucial to address a topic such as AI fatigue systematically. While traditional approaches to professional burnout—setting boundaries, maintaining work-life balance, prioritizing mental health—remain relevant, the current state of affairs may warrant additional steps. Organizations must develop sustainable practices that balance innovation with human capacity limits. This might include establishing AI update cycles that allow for proper integration periods, creating dedicated roles for knowledge synthesis and distribution, and fostering communities of practice that share the burden of staying current. The excitement and potential of AI development remain compelling, but acknowledging and addressing AI fatigue is essential for the field’s long-term health. Our challenge now is to create frameworks that allow us to harness AI’s transformative potential while maintaining the well-being of the humans driving this revolution.
Submit an Article to CACM
CACM welcomes unsolicited submissions on topics of relevance and value to the computing community.
You Just Read
AI Fatigue: Reflections on the Human Side of AI’s Rapid Advancement
View in the ACM Digital Library
© 2025 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
Shape the Future of Computing
ACM encourages its members to take a direct hand in shaping the future of the association. There are more ways than ever to get involved.
Communications of the ACM (CACM) is now a fully Open Access publication.
By opening CACM to the world, we hope to increase engagement among the broader computer science community and encourage non-members to discover the rich resources ACM has to offer.