From Zero to AI Agent: My 6-Month Journey with LLMs

When I started building my first AI agent six months ago, I had no idea what I was getting into. I’d read articles about LangChain, watched tutorials on prompt engineering, and felt confident I could piece something together in a weekend. Reality hit me hard on day three when my “simple” chatbot crashed for the fifth time, and I had no idea why.

Let’s walk through this journey together—the mistakes I made, the tools that saved me, and what I wish someone had told me on day one.

The Reality Check: Week One

My first week was humbling. I thought building an AI agent meant writing a few prompts and calling it a day. Instead, I discovered that building effective AI agents involves managing inference latency, handling unpredictable outputs, and architecting systems that won’t fall apart under real-world conditions.

💡 What I Wish I’d Known: Start with understanding the fundamentals before touching any framework. I wasted days debugging issues that stemmed from not understanding how LLMs actually process requests.

The technical challenges were real: my agent took 8-12 seconds to respond (unacceptable for users), gave different answers to the same question, and occasionally went completely off-script. Sound familiar?

Month One: Finding the Right Tools

After two weeks of frustration, I realized I needed better tools. Various approaches exist for building LLM agents, and choosing the right framework matters more than I expected.

I experimented with several options, but what finally clicked for me was finding an SDK that handled the complexity without hiding what was happening under the hood. That’s when I discovered LlmTornado—a .NET SDK that gave me the flexibility I needed while abstracting away the painful parts.

Getting Started: Installation

Before diving into code, let’s get set up. Here’s what you’ll need:

dotnet add package LlmTornado
dotnet add package LlmTornado.Agents

My First Working Agent

Here’s the first agent that actually worked the way I wanted. This research assistant taught me that good architecture starts with clear configuration:

using LlmTornado;
using LlmTornado.Chat;
using LlmTornado.Agents;
using LlmTornado.ChatFunctions;

// Initialize the API client
var api = new TornadoApi("your-api-key");

// Create an agent with specific behavior
var researchAgent = new TornadoAgent(
client: api,
model: ChatModel.OpenAi.Gpt4,
name: "ResearchAssistant",
instructions: @"You are a research assistant who provides detailed,
cited answers. Always include sources and explain your reasoning."
);

// Add tools for enhanced functionality
researchAgent.AddTool(new WebSearchTool());
researchAgent.AddTool(new CalculatorTool());

// Handle responses with proper error management
try
{
await foreach (var chunk in researchAgent.StreamAsync(
"What are the latest developments in AI agent frameworks?"))
{
Console.Write(chunk.Delta);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine($"Error: {ex.Message}");
// Implement retry logic or fallback behavior here
}

This example taught me several lessons:

• Clear instructions matter: Vague prompts lead to unpredictable behavior
• Streaming responses improve UX: Users don’t want to wait 10 seconds for a wall of text
• Error handling isn’t optional: LLMs fail in unexpected ways; plan for it

Months Two-Three: Wrestling with Real Problems

According to developers who’ve been through this, the first few months are about confronting the “black box” nature of LLMs. I felt this intensely when trying to build a coding assistant.

The Latency Problem

My biggest headache was latency. Users expect responses in under 2 seconds; my agent was taking 8-12 seconds. Here’s what actually worked:

Strategy	Impact	Complexity
Model selection (GPT-4 vs GPT-3.5-turbo)	3-4x faster responses	Low
Response streaming	Perceived instant response	Medium
Prompt optimization	20-30% reduction	Medium
Caching frequent queries	10x faster for repeats	High

The streaming approach made the biggest difference to user experience:

using LlmTornado;
using LlmTornado.Chat;
using System.Text;

var api = new TornadoApi("your-api-key");
var conversation = new Conversation(api);

var fullResponse = new StringBuilder();

await foreach (var chunk in conversation.StreamResponseEnumerableFromChatbotAsync(
"Explain how async/await works in C#"))
{
Console.Write(chunk);
fullResponse.Append(chunk);

// Show progress immediately while building complete response
}

// Now we have both: immediate feedback and complete response for processing
Console.WriteLine($"\n\nComplete response: {fullResponse}");

⚠️ Common Mistake: Don’t wait for the complete response before showing anything to users. Streaming transforms the experience from “this is broken” to “this is thinking.”

Month Four: Building Multi-Agent Systems

Things got interesting when I needed agents to work together. My roadmap shifted from building one good agent to orchestrating multiple specialized agents.

Here’s a system where a coordinator delegates tasks to specialist agents:

using LlmTornado;
using LlmTornado.Agents;
using LlmTornado.Chat;

var api = new TornadoApi("your-api-key");

// Create specialized agents
var researchAgent = new TornadoAgent(
client: api,
model: ChatModel.OpenAi.Gpt4,
name: "Researcher",
instructions: "Research topics and provide detailed summaries with citations."
);

var writerAgent = new TornadoAgent(
client: api,
model: ChatModel.OpenAi.Gpt4,
name: "Writer",
instructions: "Transform research into engaging blog posts."
);

var editorAgent = new TornadoAgent(
client: api,
model: ChatModel.OpenAi.Gpt4,
name: "Editor",
instructions: "Review content for clarity, accuracy, and tone."
);

// Coordinator orchestrates the workflow
async Task<string> CreateArticle(string topic)
{
// Step 1: Research
var research = await researchAgent.RunAsync(
$"Research current trends and key points about: {topic}"
);

// Step 2: Write draft
var draft = await writerAgent.RunAsync(
$"Write a blog post based on this research: {research.Content}"
);

// Step 3: Edit
var final = await editorAgent.RunAsync(
$"Review and improve this draft: {draft.Content}"
);

return final.Content;
}

// Use the pipeline
var article = await CreateArticle("AI agent development in 2025");
Console.WriteLine(article);

This pattern taught me that specialized agents with clear responsibilities produce better results than one agent trying to do everything.

Months Five-Six: Production Readiness

The difference between a demo and production system is enormous. Real-world implementation challenges include scalability, reliability, and managing costs.

What Not to Do: Anti-Patterns I Learned the Hard Way

Ignoring Token Limits: I built a system that occasionally hit token limits mid-response, resulting in truncated outputs. Always check token counts and handle limits gracefully. 1.

No Fallback Strategy: When the API was down, my entire system failed. Build fallbacks:

using LlmTornado;
using LlmTornado.Chat;

async Task<string> GetResponseWithFallback(string query)
{
try
{
var api = new TornadoApi("primary-key");
var conversation = new Conversation(api);
return await conversation.GetResponseFromChatbotAsync(query);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine($"Primary API failed: {ex.Message}");

// Fallback to different model or provider
try
{
var fallbackApi = new TornadoApi("backup-key");
var conversation = new Conversation(fallbackApi);
return await conversation.GetResponseFromChatbotAsync(query);
}
catch
{
return "I'm having trouble processing your request right now. Please try again.";
}
}
}

1. Treating All Requests Equally: Not every query needs GPT-4. Use faster, cheaper models when appropriate and save the expensive calls for complex tasks.

💡 Pro Tip: Implement logging from day one. When things break (and they will), you’ll need detailed logs to understand what happened. I wasted days debugging issues I couldn’t reproduce because I had no visibility into what the agents were actually doing.

Key Takeaways from Six Months

Let’s figure out together what really matters:

Start Simple: Don’t try to build a complex multi-agent system on day one. Get one agent working reliably first.

Understand the Fundamentals: Framework complexity can obscure what’s actually happening. Make sure you understand LLM basics before adding layers of abstraction.

Iterate Based on Real Usage: My initial agent design looked nothing like the final version. User feedback revealed issues I never anticipated.

Choose Tools That Grow With You: I spent time with several frameworks before finding one that worked for both simple prototypes and production systems. The LlmTornado repository has been invaluable for learning patterns and seeing complete examples.

Plan for Failure: LLMs are probabilistic systems. They will produce unexpected outputs. Design your system to handle this gracefully.

What’s Next?

Six months in, I’m still learning. The field moves fast—what’s cutting-edge today might be outdated in three months. But the fundamentals remain: clear thinking about architecture, understanding your tools deeply, and building systems that handle the messiness of real-world usage.

If you’re starting this journey, don’t worry if it feels overwhelming at first. It took me weeks to get my first agent working properly, and that’s normal. Start with one focused use case, build it properly, and expand from there.

The most important lesson? Just start building. Reading about AI agents is useful, but you’ll learn more from one weekend of hands-on coding than a month of tutorials. Make mistakes, debug them, and gradually build something that solves a real problem.

What challenges are you facing in your AI agent journey? Let’s learn together—this technology is evolving rapidly, and we’re all figuring it out as we go.