Hello, I’m Maneshwar. I’m working on FreeDevTools online currently building *one place for all dev tools, cheat codes, and TLDRs* — a free, open-source hub where developers can quickly find and use tools without any hassle of searching all over the internet.

When choosing a database for your project, two names often come up: PostgreSQL and SQLite.

Both are relational databases, both support SQL, and both are open source, but they’re built for completely different purposes.

Let’s break down the differences in a detailed, practical way so you’ll know exactly when to pick which.

Architecture Overview

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded database, it’s not a separate server process.

Instead, it’s a library that your application links directly into.

All your data lives inside a single file on disk.

No setup, no server, no config.

Just drop the file and start querying.

This makes SQLite ideal for:

• Local development
• Desktop and mobile apps
• CLI tools or small services
• Edge and embedded devices

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL (often called Postgres) is a client-server database.

It runs as a background process (daemon), and your app connects to it over a network socket using credentials.

It’s built for multi-user, concurrent, large-scale systems where data integrity and scalability matter.

Use it for:

• Web applications and APIs
• SaaS platforms
• Analytics and reporting systems
• Enterprise and production environments

Concurrency & Locking

SQLite

SQLite allows many readers at the same time, but only one writer.

It uses file-level locks or WAL (Write-Ahead Logging) to maintain consistency.

• Great for read-heavy workloads.
• Not great for apps with heavy concurrent writes.

PostgreSQL

Postgres uses MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control), meaning readers don’t block writers and vice versa.

It can handle hundreds or thousands of concurrent clients easily.

This makes Postgres a solid choice for multi-user, high-concurrency workloads like APIs or analytics dashboards.

Transactions & Consistency

Both databases are ACID-compliant, but the way they handle transactions differs.

• SQLite: ACID depends on journaling/WAL mode. Single-writer serialization may cause contention under high load.
• Postgres: Full transactional control with multiple isolation levels (READ COMMITTED, REPEATABLE READ, SERIALIZABLE). Better suited for complex multi-user transactions.

Typing & SQL Support

SQLite

SQLite uses dynamic typing, columns have “type affinity”, but you can technically insert any value into any column.

It’s lightweight and flexible but lacks some strictness and features of full SQL.

PostgreSQL

Postgres is strongly typed with a massive SQL feature set:

• Window functions
• CTEs (Common Table Expressions)
• Stored procedures
• Triggers
• Full JSONB and array support
• Rich indexing (GIN, GiST, BRIN, etc.)

If you’re doing anything beyond basic CRUD, Postgres is the better fit.

Extensibility & Ecosystem

SQLite

Comes with a few optional extensions:

• FTS5 (Full-Text Search)
• JSON1
• R*Tree
• Spatialite for GIS data

It’s portable and self-contained, but not built for complex extension systems.

PostgreSQL

Postgres shines here. It’s highly extensible, with a massive ecosystem:

• PostGIS – geospatial queries
• pg_trgm – trigram-based text search
• citext – case-insensitive text
• FDWs – query external data sources (MySQL, CSV, APIs)

You can even define custom data types and functions.

Performance & Scalability

• SQLite: Blazing fast for small datasets and local apps. Minimal latency because it avoids network calls. However, performance drops under heavy concurrent writes.
• Postgres: Designed for scale. Handles gigabytes to terabytes of data, thousands of concurrent connections, and complex analytical queries.

If you expect growth, Postgres wins long-term.

Storage, Backups & Replication

Feature	SQLite	PostgreSQL
Storage	Single file	Multi-file, multi-database
Backups	Just copy the file (or use backup API)	pg_dump, base backups, WAL shipping
Replication	None built-in	Streaming + logical replication
HA/Clustering	Not supported	Native & third-party options available

SQLite’s simplicity makes backups trivial, but Postgres gives you serious durability and failover capabilities.

Security & Access Control

SQLite has no user accounts — access is controlled via file permissions. Perfect for single-user or embedded apps.

Postgres, on the other hand, has a full authentication and authorization model:

• Roles, privileges, and grants
• Row-level security (RLS)
• SSL/TLS encryption
• Connection pooling and auditing

If you’re deploying on a network or multi-user system, Postgres is the only safe choice.

Maintenance & Operations

• SQLite: Virtually zero maintenance. You might occasionally run VACUUM to reclaim space.
• Postgres: Requires periodic maintenance — vacuuming, backups, monitoring, replication setup. More to manage, but far more power.

Quick Comparison Table

Feature	SQLite	PostgreSQL
Architecture	Embedded, file-based	Client-server
Setup	Zero-config	Requires installation & config
Concurrency	Single-writer	MVCC, full concurrency
Performance	Fast for small, local data	Scales for large systems
Data typing	Dynamic	Strong, static
JSON support	Basic	Advanced (JSONB + indexes)
Full-text search	FTS5	pg_trgm, tsvector
Replication	None	Streaming & logical replication
Extensions	Few built-in	Huge ecosystem
Backup	File copy	Dump, WAL, base backup
Security	File-level	Full role-based ACL
Ideal for	Prototyping, mobile, local apps	Production, web apps, analytics

When to Use Which

Choose SQLite if:

• You need a local, embedded DB (desktop/mobile/CLI)
• You want zero deployment setup
• Your app has low concurrency
• You prioritize portability over scalability

Choose PostgreSQL if:

• You’re building a production web service or API
• You expect many users or concurrent writes
• You need strong typing, security, and extensibility
• You want long-term scalability

Final Thoughts

Both databases are excellent — but for different jobs.

• SQLite is like a compact toolkit: small, fast, and self-contained.
• Postgres is a full workshop: powerful, complex, and ready for large projects.

Use SQLite when you want simplicity and portability. Use PostgreSQL when you need scale, reliability, and advanced features.

The key is knowing what your app will grow into — not just what it is today.

I’ve been building for FreeDevTools.

A collection of UI/UX-focused tools crafted to simplify workflows, save time, and reduce friction in searching tools/materials.

Any feedback or contributors are welcome!

It’s online, open-source, and ready for anyone to use.

👉 Check it out: FreeDevTools ⭐ Star it on GitHub: freedevtools