Remember when choosing an operating system was a big debate back in the day? Those discussions have largely faded, primarily because most desktop work now happens in browsers. With most applications now being web-based, the browser has effectively become the OS for most of us. But does it really matter which browser we use? Aren’t they all essentially the same?
Actually, yes—they are quite similar. People shouldn’t spend excessive time agonizing over browser choice (though I’m guilty of this myself). About half of users are perfectly content with whichever browser they’re using, never complaining or switching. If you’re one of them, that’s great—stick with what works for you.
However, if you feel something could be better, this guide might help you find your ideal browser.
W…
Remember when choosing an operating system was a big debate back in the day? Those discussions have largely faded, primarily because most desktop work now happens in browsers. With most applications now being web-based, the browser has effectively become the OS for most of us. But does it really matter which browser we use? Aren’t they all essentially the same?
Actually, yes—they are quite similar. People shouldn’t spend excessive time agonizing over browser choice (though I’m guilty of this myself). About half of users are perfectly content with whichever browser they’re using, never complaining or switching. If you’re one of them, that’s great—stick with what works for you.
However, if you feel something could be better, this guide might help you find your ideal browser.
Why This Matters Now
The biggest browser event in recent history was Chrome’s launch in 2008. It revolutionized browsing with a minimalist approach—ironically, the term “chrome” (referring to UI elements) became the name of a browser designed to minimize those very elements.
The past five years have brought significant changes. Many new browsers have emerged, though most haven’t disrupted the market due to limited user bases. Examples include DuckDuckGo Browser (privacy-focused), Brave, and Vivaldi. However, Arc managed to stir things up more than others, especially following the generative AI boom.
The Chromium open-source project has been instrumental in this evolution. Building or extending a browser requires serious engineering effort—it’s far more complex. The fact that so many developers are building on this foundation is remarkable.
A Note on Browser Performance
Every browser exists to solve someone’s specific problem. What seems simple and underwhelming to one person might be exactly what another needs, while a feature-rich browser that excites power users might feel overwhelming to someone else.
Some browsers claim to be faster than others, but this isn’t really the case. Most browsers are essentially different packages built on the same rendering engines. Unless there’s a fundamental architectural difference, they’re more or less the same speed. Any perceived performance differences are minimal compared to how well (or poorly) websites themselves are optimized.
This isn’t an exhaustive list—there are many excellent browsers I haven’t tried. These are simply the ones I’ve explored personally.
Google Chrome
Chrome has become the de facto standard browser, and it deserves that position. Despite memes about Chrome consuming RAM, this high memory usage is a trade-off, not a flaw.
Power users often criticize Chrome for lacking advanced features—it’s intentionally “vanilla.” But this simplicity is by design. Chrome prioritizes the majority of users who don’t need extensive features but value speed and simplicity.
Chrome hasn’t abandoned innovation; it simply chooses carefully. It pioneered many technologies, has exceptional developer tools, and now even ships built-in AI. The focus is on substantial technological advances rather than superficial features.
Some missing features, like a sidebar, raise questions. Should they be optional? Perhaps Chrome’s team lacks bandwidth for such additions while focusing on bigger initiatives.
Verdict: If you haven’t had issues with your browser so far, Chrome is a solid choice.
Firefox
Firefox uses a different rendering engine than Chrome and most other browsers. Some users prefer it for memory management, though there’s a speed trade-off. If you’ve used Chrome extensively and switch to Firefox, you’ll notice perceptible differences.
If speed isn’t your primary concern, Firefox works well. It also has derivative browsers like Zen worth exploring. Personally, even small delays (200ms or 10ms) matter to me, so I don’t use Firefox in my daily workflow. That doesn’t make it inferior—just not aligned with my priorities.
I have immense respect for Mozilla and its work.
Safari
Safari is perhaps the most minimalist browser available. If you’re happy with Chrome but don’t use many features, Safari is an excellent alternative. It integrates beautifully with macOS, with superior gesture controls that feel native to the operating system.
However, Safari has limited extension support and fewer features overall. Its sidebar takes a different approach that works for some users.
Verdict: If you’re a minimalist user, Safari is perfectly fine. However, for serious productivity work, it may not be sufficient.
Arc Browser
Arc is arguably the most ambitious browser ever created. If you feel Chrome has become limiting and want to try something different, Arc should be your first choice. Arc obsesses over details like corner radius precision, smooth transitions, thoughtful color schemes, minimal visual noise, and excellent keyboard shortcuts - a browser with artistic excellence.
Arc’s convenience scales remarkably well. It changed my entire workflow—I moved Slack, WhatsApp, Trello, and other apps from standalone applications to browser tabs because Arc’s workspace management made it so convenient. Everything happens inside the browser; you simply switch workspaces instead of windows.
Arc offers extensive customization options (perhaps too many). Features like Boosts and Zap let you modify websites with custom CSS. For example, you can remove Jira’s sticky header to increase scroll space, or hide Trello’s title bar when unnecessary.
The “Little Arc” feature is brilliant—open disposable tabs for quick viewing, then either promote them to permanent tabs or close them. This prevents tab clutter and orphaned tabs. Arc’s cleanup mode helps organize tabs automatically, which is an excellent AI use case.
However, Arc has significant drawbacks:
- No traditional bookmarks: Arc relies on pinned tabs instead. Bookmarks scale infinitely with nested folders and are easily portable between browsers. Pinned tabs don’t scale the same way, making management difficult.
- Poor syncing: Extensions and certain settings don’t sync across devices, making computer transitions problematic.
These issues, particularly the lack of bookmarks, were deal-breakers for me. While many users manage well with Arc’s system, I found it unsustainable. Arc could have kept bookmarks while still offering their innovative features.
Zen Browser
If you liked Arc’s concept but want bookmarks, Zen is “Arc with bookmarks—but without Chromium.” It uses Firefox’s engine, which makes it noticeably slower than Chromium-based browsers.
Zen is open-source and supports “Mods”—extensions that can modify the browser UI itself, not just web pages. This is powerful but sometimes glitchy.
The speed issue is significant. Memory savings don’t matter to most users, so trading memory for speed and convenience makes sense. Zen falls short here.
Verdict: If you want to upgrade from Firefox, Zen might work. Otherwise, the speed trade-off is too significant.
Microsoft Edge
Edge suffers from its association with Internet Explorer, but it’s actually quite good. Its native sidebar and workspace features make it better than vanilla Chrome in some ways.
Edge offers tab-saving and sharing features, and notably includes touchpad gesture support that most browsers lack. You can choose between full or compact sidebar views.
However, pinned tab management is confusing. Questions like “What happens when you pin and close a tab?” and “Are pinned tabs unclosable?” aren’t well-addressed, leading to accidentally closing the wrong tabs.
Verdict: A solid Chrome alternative with useful features, though the pinned tab UX needs work.
Vivaldi
If Arc is the king of color customization, Vivaldi is the king of all customization. You can position tabs anywhere (top, bottom, left, right), stack them, use accordion mode, and rearrange virtually every UI element.
Vivaldi includes built-in modules for email, calendar, and RSS feeds. While these didn’t fit my workflow, they could be invaluable for others. Every browser should support RSS feeds—it’s a fundamental web standard that deserves promotion.
The Floating Panel feature is underrated. Pin items to the side (notes, ChatGPT, calendar, email, WhatsApp) and access them with a click. They open as overlays without disrupting your browsing history and auto-close when you click away. These panels remain loaded, providing instant access.
This distinction between tabs and floating applications is brilliant. Not everything needs to be a tab.
Verdict: Everyone should try Vivaldi at least once. When life gets boring, install it and explore the possibilities.
Brave
Brave feels like Chrome with an integrated ad blocker. It has crypto-related features and a built-in VPN, but nothing particularly special. Everything Brave offers could be achieved with Chrome extensions.
Verdict: Nothing notable beyond ad-blocking.
Comet, Atlas, Dia
These are AI-controlled browsers—useful tools but not for daily use. They’re essentially basic Chrome instances with AI control capabilities. I had high hopes for Dia, but I was disappointed. Comet is decent, but its ads promoting “ad-free YouTube” make it seem like just another mod lacking any real sense of ethics.
Claude is building an extension that could replicate their functionality across any browser. Currently, Claude’s solution requires a paid plan and is not very stable; however, I feel that this may make these AI-specialized browsers obsolete.
Use case: Install one for specific AI-assisted tasks (automated workflows, AI-driven navigation), but not as your primary browser. They’re valuable because your accounts are already logged in, allowing AI to interact with authenticated sessions—something chat-based AI can’t do. There are security concerns, but the capabilities are impressive.
Conclusion
Some browsers I haven’t tried may offer genuinely unique features. But many are nothing more than Chromium wrappers masquerading as “original” creations — the cheapest and most shameful route in browser development. Worse still are those that not only rebrand Chromium but also attempt to segregate users based on nationality or organization — a truly pathetic display of faux innovation and misplaced pride.
Apart from those, every legitimate browser has earned my respect. Browser experimentation is interesting—just like rearranging furniture affects your mood, trying different browsers can refresh your digital workspace. Please share your thoughts on the comments.