Aarush Sah

Jul 31, 2025

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) today is fundamentally broken.

If you’ve spent any time with eval frameworks, you already know the drill: each one makes different decisions on how to prompt models, parse responses, and measure metrics like accuracy. Every lab has its own approach – pass@k, best-of-n, zero-shot, few-shot, CoT prompting… the list goes on. It’s subtle, but it means you can never truly compare numbers across different frameworks or model releases.

Even when everything is meticulously documented, reproducing results is frustratingly hard. Tiny implementation quirks creep in everywhere. In practice, benchmark scores are basically irreproducible.

![](https://cdn.sanity.io/images/chol0sk5/production/d3a0a84bab4148cde871d52b9aa9a93bce42…

Similar Posts

Loading similar posts...

Keyboard Shortcuts

Navigation
Next / previous item
j/k
Open post
oorEnter
Preview post
v
Post Actions
Love post
a
Like post
l
Dislike post
d
Undo reaction
u
Recommendations
Add interest / feed
Enter
Not interested
x
Go to
Home
gh
Interests
gi
Feeds
gf
Likes
gl
History
gy
Changelog
gc
Settings
gs
Browse
gb
Search
/
General
Show this help
?
Submit feedback
!
Close modal / unfocus
Esc

Press ? anytime to show this help