A federal jury convicted Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah C. Dugan of felony obstruction after prosecutors said she helped a man evade federal immigration authorities at a courthouse earlier this year. The case centered on an incident in which agents were waiting outside a courtroom as the man appeared before Dugan on a separate criminal matter, and the judge was accused of directing him toward an exit that avoided them. Dugan was acquitted on a separate misdemeanor count related to concealing an individual to prevent arrest, leaving a split verdict that both sides pointed to as significant.

Judge Hannah C. Dugan entered court on the first day of her federal trial.

Highlights:

  • April courthouse event: Prosecutors said the incident happened April 18, when Dugan allegedly helped Eduardo Flores-Ruiz and his lawyer leave through a back door after she learned ICE agents were in the building.
  • Deliberations length: Jurors reached their split decision after about six hours of deliberations that extended into the night, according to multiple reports.
  • Immunity claim denied: A federal judge rejected Dugan’s argument that she had immunity from prosecution before the case went to trial, Fox News reported.
  • Potential sentence: The felony obstruction conviction carries a possible penalty of up to five years in prison, according to Fox News.
While we are disappointed in today’s outcome, the failure of the prosecution to secure convictions on both counts demonstrates the opportunity we have to clear Judge Dugan’s name and show she did nothing wrong in this matter - Judge Hannah Dugan’s defense team

Perspectives:

  • Prosecutors: They argued Dugan knowingly interfered with federal agents by helping an undocumented immigrant avoid arrest at the courthouse. (The New York Times)
  • Defense team for Judge Dugan: They said they were disappointed but viewed the not-guilty verdict on one count as an opening to keep fighting the case and clear her name. (Fox News)
  • Interim U.S. attorney (Eastern District of Wisconsin): He described the matter as a standard criminal case and emphasized accepting the jury’s verdict rather than treating the judge as a symbol. (Fox News)

Sources:

Similar Posts

Loading similar posts...

Keyboard Shortcuts

Navigation
Next / previous item
j/k
Open post
oorEnter
Preview post
v
Post Actions
Love post
a
Like post
l
Dislike post
d
Undo reaction
u
Recommendations
Add interest / feed
Enter
Not interested
x
Go to
Home
gh
Interests
gi
Feeds
gf
Likes
gl
History
gy
Changelog
gc
Settings
gs
Browse
gb
Search
/
General
Show this help
?
Submit feedback
!
Close modal / unfocus
Esc

Press ? anytime to show this help