The study was conducted by Charles Darwin University (CDU) Lecturer in Enabling Vimbai Mutero. Credit: Supplied
Influencers use oppression, manipulation and weaponization to police Black women on social media, according to new research uncovering the entrenched nature of digital racism.
The study by Charles Darwin University (CDU) Lecturer in Enabling (Humanities) Vimbai Mutero, whose research explores gender-based violence in various forms, examined the unsolicited advice and digital policing of Black femininity across major soc…
The study was conducted by Charles Darwin University (CDU) Lecturer in Enabling Vimbai Mutero. Credit: Supplied
Influencers use oppression, manipulation and weaponization to police Black women on social media, according to new research uncovering the entrenched nature of digital racism.
The study by Charles Darwin University (CDU) Lecturer in Enabling (Humanities) Vimbai Mutero, whose research explores gender-based violence in various forms, examined the unsolicited advice and digital policing of Black femininity across major social media platforms.
‘“As a Woman…’: Policing Black Femininity Through Unsolicited Digital Advice” was published in the Journal of Femininities.
This focused on content created by Black influencers, podcasters and social media personalities from YouTube, TikTok and Instagram Reels.
Three central themes emerged from the videos: framing gender equality and women’s autonomy as betrayals of Black cultural values, discouraging independence and portraying single and independent women as undesirable or miserable, and glorification of suffering and submission.
Mutero said with the reach of these videos spanning millions of views, likes and comments of support, it showed how deeply these beliefs are ingrained and how social media can amplify these harmful ideologies.
“The gaslighting, manipulation, and social regulation taking place in online spaces condition Black women to normalize coercion, submission, and emotional suppression,” Mutero said.
“Together, the three themes reveal a multifaceted logic of digital femmephobia, one that punishes Black women for expressing autonomy, resisting submission, or performing femininity in ways that fall outside dominant racialized and heteronormative scripts.
“One of the most pervasive tropes in the dataset was the strategic use of racial and cultural identity to regulate Black femininity, often framed as an effort to ‘preserve’ cultural values.
“This messaging places Black women in a precarious double bind, where they are forced to choose between their Blackness and their womanhood.”
The results in the second theme explored how this online content also twisted the notion of a “strong Black woman” not to be a representation of strength.
“Across multiple videos, influencers, predominantly men, warned women that pursuing education, career success, or financial independence would inevitably lead to romantic failure, loneliness, and social rejection,” Mutero said.
“The ‘Strong Black Woman,’ in this framework, is not celebrated but punished, depicted as bitter, undesirable, and a social outcast.
“Videos under this theme were the most widely consumed in the dataset. The volume of engagement suggests that these ideas are not fringe but algorithmically favored and widely embraced.”
Mutero said while this digital behavior is prevalent, there were online creators and spaces who challenged the policing of Black femininity.
“The same algorithms that amplify patriarchal policing can also be leveraged to foster Black feminist solidarity, as seen in hashtag movements that challenge gendered violence and call out digital misogynoir,” Mutero said.
More information: ‘“As a Woman…’: Policing Black Femininity Through Unsolicited Digital Advice,” Journal of Femininities (2025). DOI: 10.1163-29501229-bja10024
Citation: Is social media subjecting Black women to radicalized digital policing? (2025, November 20) retrieved 20 November 2025 from https://phys.org/news/2025-11-social-media-subjecting-black-women.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.