Unpacking the attentional biases that define the limits and opportunities of long-context AI.

12 min readJust now

–

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Our most powerful AIs can read a library of information, but they often forget what’s in the middle chapters.

Let’s talk about the weirdest, most hilarious, and frankly, most important problem in AI right now.

We’re in the middle of an AI arms race. Every other week, someone announces a new Large Language Model (LLM) with a “context window” the size of a small country. We’ve gone from a few thousand tokens (think a couple of pages) to over a million (think the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy, plus the appendices). The dream is an AI that can read a whole company’s legal history or an entire software codebase and instantly become an expert.

But here’s the punchline, discovered by some very clever researchers: these genius AIs have the memory of a goldfish. Or, more accurately, a student who crams for an exam by reading the first chapter, the last chapter, and then taking a very long nap in between.

A landmark study dropped a bombshell on the AI world, revealing that our most advanced models are brilliant at recalling info you put at the very beginning or the very end of their massive context windows. But the stuff in the middle? Poof. It’s a cognitive blind spot. They get completely, hopelessly “lost in the middle” (Liu, Hopkins, Woss, & Dal, 2023).

This isn’t just a funny quirk. It’s a fundamental crack in the foundation of the long-context dream. It tells us that making the AI’s brain bigger isn’t enough. We have to learn how to organize its thoughts. This has given rise to a whole new, critical discipline: Context Engineering, the science of architecting information for an AI’s brilliant but wandering mind.

The Million-Dollar Blind Spot: Why This Matters Now

Press enter or click to view image in full size

In high-stakes fields like medicine and law, overlooking a single detail from the middle of a long document can have massive consequences.

The race for bigger context windows is fueled by some seriously high-stakes ambitions. We want AI lawyers that can analyze a 1,000-page contract, AI doctors that can synthesize a patient’s entire medical history, and AI programmers that can debug a million lines of code.

But the “Lost in the Middle” problem throws a giant wrench in the works.

Imagine that AI lawyer missing the one critical liability clause tucked away on page 473 of a contract. Or a medical AI that overlooks a key symptom mentioned halfway through a patient’s decade-long health record. A million-token context window is worse than useless if you can’t trust the model to find the crucial detail hidden in the middle 80% of it. This isn’t just an academic curiosity; it’s a massive reliability and safety issue.

And let’s talk money. Processing all that context costs a fortune in computing power. If the vast majority of that expensive memory is an attentional dead zone, companies are essentially paying for a V12 engine but only using the first and last cylinders. Context Engineering, therefore, isn’t just about performance — it’s about getting an ROI on these fantastically expensive machines.

*“The capacity to learn is a gift; the ability to learn is a skill; the willingness to learn is a choice.” — Brian Herbert. *(And right now, our AIs are choosing to only learn the beginning and the end.)

The Case of the Missing Clue: Unpacking the “U-Shaped” Truth

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The famous “needle in a haystack” test revealed a shocking U-shaped performance curve: AI models excel at finding information at the edges of their context but fail dramatically in the middle.”

To understand how we got here, you need to know about the magic trick that made modern AI possible: In-Context Learning (ICL). Before 2020, if you wanted an AI to do something new, you had to perform costly, time-consuming “fine-tuning.” Then, the GPT-3 paper showed that you could “program” a big enough model on-the-fly just by giving it a few examples in the prompt (Brown et al., 2020). The context window became our playground.

But every playground has rules.

The researchers behind “Lost in the Middle” devised a beautifully simple experiment called the “needle in a haystack” test. They took a key piece of information (the “needle”) and buried it at different depths within a long, irrelevant document (the “haystack”). They then asked the AI a question it could only answer by finding that needle.

The results were shocking. When the needle was at the very start or the very end, the AI found it almost every time. But as they moved it toward the middle, the AI’s performance plummeted, creating a distinct “U-shaped” performance curve.

So, why does this happen? Is the AI actually “learning” from the context? Not exactly. Further research revealed that the model isn’t so much learning new facts from the context as it is using the context to figure out what kind of task you want it to do (Min et al., 2022; Pan et al., 2023). The information at the beginning and end acts like giant, flashing neon signs saying, “THE TASK IS THIS!” The stuff in the middle gets lost in the noise. It’s a positional bias, hardwired into the architecture.

ProTip: The Kickboxer’s Analogy In my kickboxing days, I learned that the first and last strikes in a combination are the ones that stick. The opening jab sets the distance, and the final roundhouse kick is the one you remember. The flurry of punches in between can become a blur to your opponent — and sometimes, even to you. An LLM’s attention works in much the same way. Land your important shots first or last.

Enter the Chief of Staff: The Rise of Context Engineering

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Context Engineering acts as a Chief of Staff for a brilliant but distracted AI, curating and organizing information so it can be used effectively.

If the problem is that our genius AI is a brilliant but hopelessly distracted CEO, the solution is to hire it a world-class Chief of Staff. That Chief of Staff is the Context Engineer.

Context Engineering is the discipline of designing, managing, and optimizing the information flow to an LLM. It’s about taking the messy, chaotic firehose of data in the world and turning it into a perfectly curated briefing document that our AI can actually use. It elevates “prompting” from a quirky art form into a rigorous engineering discipline (LangChain, n.d.; Masood, n.d.; Teki, n.d.).

The cornerstone technique in our toolkit is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) (Lewis et al., 2020).

Think of RAG as giving the AI an “open-book exam.” Instead of relying on its static, pre-trained memory (which might be out of date or just plain wrong), we connect it to a vast, external knowledge base (the textbook). When a query comes in, the “retriever” acts like a super-fast index, finding the most relevant passages from the textbook. These passages are then put into the context window — the single page of notes the AI is allowed to bring to the exam.

This is a game-changer for accuracy and trust. But it also makes the “Lost in the Middle” problem painfully clear. What good is having the entire textbook if the notes on your cheat sheet are a jumbled mess?

The Engineer’s Toolkit: Solutions for a Wandering Mind

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Modern Context Engineering provides a toolkit of solutions, from strategically re-ordering data to using sophisticated models to rerank and compress information.

Knowing about the problem is one thing; fixing it is another. Luckily, context engineers have developed some brilliant techniques to counteract the AI’s attentional flaws.

1. Strategic Placement: The Art of Position Engineering

This solution is so simple it’s almost insulting, yet it’s incredibly powerful. Since we know the AI pays most attention to the beginning and end of the context, let’s just put the important stuff there! Research on **Position Engineering **shows that by simply re-ordering the documents you retrieve to place the most critical information at the top or bottom of the prompt, you can get a massive performance boost for zero extra cost (He et al., 2024). It’s the free lunch of AI optimization.

2. Ensuring Quality: The Unsung Hero of the Reranker

A basic RAG system is like a junior research assistant who runs to the library and dumps a pile of 20 books on your desk. Some are relevant, some aren’t. A Reranker is the smart, experienced librarian who takes that pile, skims them all, and puts the one book with the perfect chapter right on top for you.

Technically, a reranker is a more powerful (and slower) model that re-assesses the initial, noisy list of documents from the retriever, ordering them by true relevance (Glass et al., 2022; Shi & Wang, 2023). If you can only get your AI to pay attention to a few things, the reranker makes sure they are the right few things.

3. Reducing Noise: Prompt Compression and Refinement

An AI’s attention is a scarce resource (Anthropic, n.d.). When the context is filled with fluff, redundant phrases, and irrelevant details, the important signals get drowned out. This is where techniques like Prompt Compression come in. These methods cleverly remove useless tokens from the context without losing the core information, making the prompt shorter, cheaper to process, and more focused (Li et al., 2024). Another cool trick is Meta-Prompting, where you use one LLM to summarize and clean up the retrieved context before handing it to the main LLM that will answer the user’s question (Rodrigues & Branco, 2024). It’s like having an editor for your AI’s briefing notes.

Fact Check: The “Attention” mechanism in Transformer models (the ‘T’ in GPT) is what allows them to weigh the importance of different words in the input. However, the “Lost in the Middle” problem shows that this attention isn’t perfectly distributed, and is biased by the physical position of the tokens.

The Long-Context Frontier: Debates and Harsh Realities

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The promise of million-token context windows can be a mirage; brutal benchmarks show the effective context length is often much smaller than the advertised one.

So, with all these tricks, have we solved the problem? Not quite. This is where we need to have a little reality check about the “Million-Token Mirage.”

The gap between the advertised context length and the effective context length is huge. To cut through the marketing hype, researchers have developed brutal benchmarks like LooGLE (Li et al., 2023). This isn’t a simple “find the needle” test. It asks models to synthesize information from across a massive document, a much harder task. The results are sobering: even the best models on the market today struggle mightily, confirming that “Lost in the Middle” is a deep and persistent challenge.

Furthermore, there’s a weird asymmetry: models are often much better at ingesting or comprehending a long document than they are at generating a coherent, long-form answer based on it. This is a key area of ongoing research, and a reminder that we’re still in the early days of this long-context adventure.

The Post-Credits Scene: From Static Prompts to Agentic AI

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The future is Agentic RAG, where the AI is no longer a passive recipient of information but an active agent that directs its own focus and information-gathering process.

So what’s the future? If today’s solutions are about being a better Chief of Staff for the AI, tomorrow’s solutions are about promoting the AI to run the company itself.

The techniques we’ve discussed are fantastic, but they still rely on a fixed, human-designed pipeline. The next leap is Agentic RAG.

Instead of a linear “retrieve-rerank-generate” flow, an Agentic AI operates in a “reason-act-observe” loop (Singh et al., 2025; Liang et al., 2024). Think about the difference between a junior analyst and a senior one. You hand the junior analyst a pre-made report and say, “Summarize this.” You go to the senior analyst and say, “Investigate why Q3 sales are down.” The senior analyst doesn’t wait for you. She pulls her own data, decides which reports are relevant, cross-references them, and asks clarifying questions. She is an agent, actively managing her own information-gathering process.

This is the ultimate solution to being “lost in the middle.” An agent can decide its attentional focus is too cluttered, formulate a new, more specific query for its retriever, reflect on the quality of the results, and dynamically construct the perfect context for itself in that moment.

The Final Word

We started this journey with a shocking, almost comical discovery: our most powerful AIs have a bizarre attentional blind spot. This vulnerability, this “Lost in the Middle” phenomenon, has forced us to be smarter. It exposed the gap between just having a big memory (capacity) and being able to use it wisely (capability).

That challenge has sparked a new field of Context Engineering, and the solutions are evolving at a breakneck pace. We’ve gone from simple retrieval to sophisticated pipelines with rerankers and position engineering. Now, we’re on the cusp of truly autonomous Agentic AI that can manage its own attention.

The future of powerful, reliable AI doesn’t lie in building ever-larger, empty memory palaces. It lies in us becoming meticulous, clever architects of AI’s attention, ensuring that no matter how big the room gets, the most important information is always front, center, and impossible to ignore.

References

Foundational Research & Positional Bias

• Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., … & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33. Link
• Liu, N. Y., Hopkins, K., Woss, A., & Dal, E. (2023). Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03172. Link
• Min, S., Lyu, X., Holtzman, A., Artetxe, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Hajishirzi, H. (2022). Rethinking the role of demonstrations: What makes in-context learning work? In International Conference on Learning Representations. Link
• Pan, J., Gao, T., Chen, H., & Chen, D. (2023). What in-context learning ‘learns’ in-context: Disentangling task recognition and task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.09731. Link

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) & Reranking

• Glass, M., Rossiello, G., Chowdhury, M. F. M., Naik, A., Cai, P., & Gliozzo, A. (2022). Re2G: Retrieve, Rerank, Generate. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Link
• Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., … & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33. Link
• Shi, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). Let’s not forget the reranker in retrieval-augmented large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07728. Link
• Wu, M., Liu, Z., Yan, Y., Li, X., Yu, S., Zeng, Z., … & Yu, G. (2024). RankCoT: Refining Knowledge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Ranking Chain-of-Thoughts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10424. Link
• Yu, Y., Ping, W., Liu, Z., Wang, B., You, J., Zhang, C., … & Catanzaro, B. (2024). RankRAG: Unifying Context Ranking with Retrieval-Augmented Generation in LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11942. Link

Long-Context & Evaluation

• Fu, Y., Panda, R., Niu, X., Yue, X., Hajishirzi, H., Kim, Y., & Peng, H. (2024). Data engineering for scaling language models to 128K context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10171. Link
• Li, J., Wang, M., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, M. (2023). LooGLE: Can long-context language models understand long contexts? arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04939. Link
• Mao, Y., Xu, Y., Li, J., Meng, F., Yang, H., Zheng, Z., … & Zhang, M. (2025). LIFT: Improving long context understanding of large language models through long input fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14644. Link

Advanced Context Engineering Techniques

• He, Z., Jiang, H., Wang, Z., Yang, Y., Qiu, L., & Qiu, L. (2024). Position engineering: Boosting large language models through positional information manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11216. Link
• Li, M., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Wang, W., & Li, S. (2024). Dense-and-Sparse: An Effective Method for Query-Agnostic Prompt Compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01323. Link
• Rodrigues, J., & Branco, A. (2024). Meta-prompting optimized retrieval-augmented generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03955. Link

The Future: Agentic AI Systems

• Liang, J., Su, G., Lin, H., Wu, Y., Zhao, R., & Li, Z. (2024). Reasoning RAG via System 1 or System 2: A Survey on Reasoning Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Industry Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10408. Link
• Maragheh, R. Y., Vadla, P., Gupta, P., Zhao, K., Inan, A., Yao, K., … & Kumar, S. (2025). ARAG: Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation for Personalized Recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21931. Link
• Singh, A., Ehtesham, A., Kumar, S., & Khoei, T. T. (2025). Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09136. Link

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any past, present, or future employer. AI assistance was used in researching, drafting, and generating images for this article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0).