1/ To the doomsayers warning “don’t attack the BBC, you will miss it when it is gone”, I say this. It has been gone for me for years. It deplatformed my friends, it called me a bigot, it produced a gay male dating show featuring a woman. I will miss nothing of that when it goes. **
2/ In LGBTWTFLOL politics we have this term, “forced teaming”, it means conflating the political cases of homosexuals with transvestites. I will not be “forced teamed” again and be told I must shut up for the sake of my national broadcaster for some nostalgic love. **
3/ I have no use for the BBC, and have not done so for years, as it mass produced gender ideological propaganda which told the lesbian/gay youth there was 100 genders and they had the wrong body and Dr. Who wanted to know their pronouns. …
1/ To the doomsayers warning “don’t attack the BBC, you will miss it when it is gone”, I say this. It has been gone for me for years. It deplatformed my friends, it called me a bigot, it produced a gay male dating show featuring a woman. I will miss nothing of that when it goes. **
2/ In LGBTWTFLOL politics we have this term, “forced teaming”, it means conflating the political cases of homosexuals with transvestites. I will not be “forced teamed” again and be told I must shut up for the sake of my national broadcaster for some nostalgic love. **
3/ I have no use for the BBC, and have not done so for years, as it mass produced gender ideological propaganda which told the lesbian/gay youth there was 100 genders and they had the wrong body and Dr. Who wanted to know their pronouns. **
4/ I have no use or affection for this force which pilloried people who tried to raise the alarm on gender or told Kate Barker, CEO of LGB Alliance on Women’s Hour that when she said lesbians are actually women that this might be offensive to listeners. **
5/ This veiled threat reminds me of trans activists saying “they will come for you next” when that sentence rested in the mouths of people coming for me now. No. That means no. I won’t be intimidated. I won’t be force teamed. I won’t stay silent for the sake of the BBC. **
6/ The BBC has one value and one value only.
It was trusted.
It chose to squander that trust and demand women and gays/lesbians shut up.
I won’t shut up and I won’t accept the BBC is some necessity I need in my life. **
7/ If the BBC wants to be considered needed and necessary and fair it can damn well act according to those virtues. It can stop obsessing about drag queens. It can platform gender critical feminists. It can listen to gay men and lesbians critical of gender ideology. **
8/ But I say this, personally.
Once bitten, twice shy.
Any sentimental affection I have for the BBC has long been displaced by the fact The Times broke the Tavistock story, the Telegraph broke the BBC one and GB News was the only channel that would have Helen Joyce on. **
9/ When Lesbians and Gays were warning that gender clinics were chemically castrating our next generation it was the right wing that listened and the left wing that cancelled and silenced, and the fact the BBC can be described as either is a failure of impartiality. **
10/ To those rebuilding the BBC, I wish you well, but personally speaking, I have no interest in the emotional force teaming of “losing a national institution” discourse, you have shown yourself to be partisan and anto gay/lesbian and we’re used to feeling on our own. **
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
** ** Keep Current with Dennis Noel Kavanagh **
Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!
** ** This Thread may be Removed Anytime!**
Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!
More from @Jebadoo2
Nov 8
1/ I find this very difficult to accept as a justification for demonstrable BBC bias over gender and I think it underplays the role of fear of cancellation in favour of good faith. What I would say is this, in the first place, journalists accepting orthodoxy is terrifying.
2/ Second, I would say that accepting orthodoxy at a time when the Times newspaper was reporting that staff at the Tavistock had a dark joke that “soon there will be no gay people left” is particularly alarming because accepting orthodoxy here means ignoring or supressing critics
3/ Third, while Hannah Barnes was doing heroic work on Newsnight on the Tavistock for which the BBC deserves credit, it’s clear she was swimming against an editorial tide on this issue from the way Graham Linehan was treated.
Read 12 tweets
Nov 4
1/ In 2016 the Supreme Court ruled in a criminal case called R v Jogee. The law lords ruled that the law of murder had “taken a wrong turn” and too many had been wrongly convicted on the “joint enterprise” doctrine. Practice in the Crown Court changed the very next day.
https://twitter.com/journalismseen/status/1985508368375492944
2/ There was no guidance on the matter before it was expected to be applied (guidance did follow, but on the basis this had been the law since the time of the judgment) and there was certainly no impact assessment or that sort of thing. The law was the law.
3/ If you contrast that with the For Women Scotland judgment you see something quite different which tells you a lot about the health of the rule of law and which groups are given all but tacit permission to consider themselves above it.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 31
1/ It is irrational for the Secretary of State to impose upon the EHRC what she knows is a laborious and time consuming burden to put off the politically inevitable. The Supreme Court has ruled men are men and women are women, whether Labour backbenchers like that or not.
2/ What we have here is this. The Supreme Court has reached a clear judgment. The Secretary of State knows it is sensible but fears her backbenchers. The Government would rather not have this row so has decided kicking this into the long grass is politically expedient.
3/ The EHRC is duty bound by statue to provide guidance on the law of the Equality Act. The meaning of that act has been settled by the Supreme Court. Assessing regulatory impact is besides the point. Nothing in an EHRC report about such impact changes the law as settled.
Read 12 tweets
Oct 14
1/ As the bitter tide of gender recedes, @stonewalluk have some introspection and apologising to do. They called lesbians “sexual racists”, they cancelled and pilloried gay men, they engineered modern gay conversion by preaching children had the wrong bodies....wrong for what?
2/ The answer to that was “the wrong bodies to be heterosexuals”, because the 2012 Tavistock patient survey told us the 80% of boys and 90% of girls were same sex attracted.
They had the “wrong bodies” to be straight.
Stonewall pushed this. They aided and abetted this.
3/ The gay rights movement is a naive and new thing left with incompetents post marriage and decimated by our AIDS losses. But it anointed liars like Ruth Hunt who told frightened parents 50% of children denied puberty blockers commit suicide. This was an evil lie.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 14
1/ What a bitter harvest it is to win the gender wars. What a many better thing it would have been to have been wrong. There’s no great joy to being a veteran and saying “yes, you did chemically castrate gay and autistic youth, we were correct”. How empty this victory is.
2/ To win and see the crushing defeat of political transvestitism, the desire to displace sex in law with a feeling based on clothing. To see your society challenged by a force that sought nothing less than to crumble the 4 walls of reality on the weak. Because that’s what it was
3/ Epistemological, moral and post modern chaos where there was no such thing as a woman other than the men who said they were women was a challenge not just to order, but to sanity or any basic truth claim, it was chaos incarnate. And chaos is a jungle. And Jungles…….
Read 10 tweets
Sep 1
1/ It takes a rather implacable and sustained commitment to delusion to imagine that the socially necessary instances of separation of the sexes - a constant in one form or another in all human societies in history - is something we can just toss aside being better enlightened.
2/ It is said that when you look into the abyss it peers back into you, and so it is fighting litigious transvestites and their cadre of modern day clerics, only we are looking into a deeply stupid philosophy and it makes us stupid peering back into us. Blokes ain’t ladies.
3/ There are only so many times one can acknowledge universal truths like (1) men commit almost all sex offences (2) men win at almost all sports (3) a nurse with a heavy period certainly needs a space away from blokes before one suffers a sort of intellectual death by repetition
Read 12 tweets