Pamela MaldonadoNov 6, 2025, 06:35 AM ET
Pamela Maldonado is a sports betting analyst for ESPN.
Three weeks left of college football should be fun. How do you make sense of a weekend slate where offense looks optional in one matchup, the red zone turns into quicksand in another and two teams decide defense is more of a suggestion than a requirement?
Just lean into the late-season chaos.
From a “leave the popcorn” rock fight, to a field-goal festival disguised as football, then to a game where scoreboards might need load management, we’re going where the market overreacts and the numbers tell the truth.
This late in the season, we’re finding value in the ugly, the stu…
Pamela MaldonadoNov 6, 2025, 06:35 AM ET
Pamela Maldonado is a sports betting analyst for ESPN.
Three weeks left of college football should be fun. How do you make sense of a weekend slate where offense looks optional in one matchup, the red zone turns into quicksand in another and two teams decide defense is more of a suggestion than a requirement?
Just lean into the late-season chaos.
From a “leave the popcorn” rock fight, to a field-goal festival disguised as football, then to a game where scoreboards might need load management, we’re going where the market overreacts and the numbers tell the truth.
This late in the season, we’re finding value in the ugly, the stubborn and the downright electric.
All odds by ESPN BET
Stanford Cardinal at North Carolina Tar Heels
Pick: UNDER 41.5 (-115)
Don’t overcomplicate it. This is not Drake Maye versus Tanner McKee. Instead, this matchup features two offenses stuck in the mud with no explosiveness, no rhythm and no real margin for error.
The profile of both squads is about moving the ball in inches, not chunks, and every first down feels like an eight-play negotiation. The result? Both the Cardinal and Tar Heels are bottom-10 in yards per play.
Now shrink the field – inside the red zone, it gets even worse. Stanford has scored touchdowns on just 13 of 28 trips, while UNC has 12 touchdowns on 24 attempts. That’s coin-flip touchdown probability any time either gets inside the 20. And when the strengths of both defenses show up – UNC’s tackling, Stanford’s situational grit – finishing drives becomes a luxury.
When betting an UNDER, you look for teams to stall. Well, both offenses already do that organically. You just need them to be who they already are: inefficient, conservative and allergic to touchdowns.
Missouri State Bears at Liberty Flames
Pick: UNDER 51.5 (-110)
There’s two data points that jump off the page to validate the under: red zone efficiency (both offenses stall) and points per play (exposes the ceiling).
Neither the Bears or Flames are touchdown teams, as both are under 61% for red zone touchdowns. They move the ball in pockets, then bog down inside the 20. There’s three weeks left in the season, so this isn’t a one-off situation. Both are top-30 in field goal attempts. Every stalled drive bleeds clock and kills scoring runs, and neither team has the vertical passing game to suddenly flip that script.
Both teams are outside the top 80 in offensive efficiency, which tells us that these offenses struggle both situationally and per snap. They lean on rushing volume, chew clock and simply don’t create big-chunk plays consistently to justify a shootout.
Meanwhile, both defenses are sturdier in coverage than run support, which could actually slow scoring even further; more handoffs, fewer deep throws and more time draining off the clock.
Florida State Seminoles at Clemson Tigers
Pick: Florida State (+110)
The single biggest edge in this matchup is Florida State’s ability to finish drives. They are top-10 in touchdowns scored, converting red-zone trips into six at a 75% clip.
Clemson has 17 touchdowns on 26 red-zone trips, which sounds fine until you realize the volume and efficiency gap. One team is maximizing opportunities, while the other is hoping for them. In a tight game, winning the drives that matter is usually the separator, and Florida State has consistently proven it can finish.
The second key edge is explosiveness paired with pace. Florida State runs 73 plays per game, generating 6.5 yards per play. Clemson is closer to 70 plays at 6.0 yards per snap. It may seem like a minor edge, but over four quarters, that difference shows up as extra possessions, more chunk plays and more scoring opportunities for the side that actually converts them.
The market is pricing this like a coin flip because Clemson is at home, but the efficiency gap is real. If both teams move the ball, bet on the roster that punches drives in and forces the opponent to match. That’s the Seminoles.
Air Force Falcons at San José State Spartans
Pick: OVER 67.5 (-115)
Air Force isn’t playing service-academy football anymore. We’re not seeing grind-the-clock, shorten-the-game, three-yards-and-out smashmouth football.
The Falcons have evolved into an explosive, downhill offense that hits chunk runs, stresses edges and finishes drives at one of the best rates in the country. In fact, they’re even playing with pace, highly efficient (top-20 in yards per play) and when they get inside the 20 they score touchdowns.
San José State is the perfect dance partner. The Spartans also play fast, stretch the field vertically and are peaking offensively, increasing points per play production over the last three weeks. The pass game has real juice, and their run game gives just enough balance to punish light boxes.
Now match that with two defenses that don’t tackle consistently, two secondaries that are in the bottom 10 in coverage and red-zone units letting offenses cash in instead of settling, then you have a touchdown-for-touchdown game.
Both teams live in the explosive range, finish drives and neither unit is built to get three straight stops. It’s a first-to-40 environment.