Introduction

The dynamic reversibility of non-covalent recognition interactions renders them inherently concentration-dependent, highlighting the importance of binding affinity in ensuring the practical applicability of recognition pairs across a wide concentration range1. Despite the extensive development of supramolecular macrocyclic systems over recent decades, cucurbit[n]urils (CB[n]s), particularly CB[7] and CB[8], remain irreplaceable in host-guest chemistry on account of their exceptional binding strength in aqueous solutions2,3,4,5. CB[7] exhibits 1:1 binding affinities exceeding 109 M−1, with the strongest interactions reaching up to 1017 M−1 6. CB[8] not only shows high 1:1 affinity but also forms 1:2 host-guest complexes, with affinities as high as 1016 M−2 7. This remarkable ability to recognize both 1:1 and 1:2 complexes in water and their biocompatibility positions CB[n]s as superior hosts compared to other macrocycles, leading to their widespread application in many different research fields8.

Achieving high-affinity recognition requires excellent structural complementarity between host and guest, maximizing interactions while minimizing entropic penalties to overcome the limitations of enthalpy–entropy compensation4,9,10,11. For 1:2 binding, the design of host-guest complementarity poses even greater challenges than for 1:1 binding, as the formation of tightly bounded ternary complexes demands heightened structural complementarity and inevitably incurs larger entropic losses. Consequently, while recent advances have yielded several novel macrocyclic hosts with high 1:1 binding affinities exceeded nanomolar level12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, replicating the 1:2 recognition capabilities of CB[8] remain a significant challenge.

The importance of high-affinity 1:2 binding hosts lies in their ability to serve as robust yet dynamic noncovalent linkers for efficient molecular conjugation technologies, which are highly useful in polymer chemistry26,27,28,29, nanotechnology30,31, and biomedicine32,33,34. For example, CB[8] has proven itself as a robust noncovalent connector, by linking guest-modified partners—such as small molecules, macromolecules, nanoparticles, and surfaces—with high-fidelity and stimuli-responsiveness. This versatility underpins its widespread use in supramolecular polymers35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43, hydrogels44,45,46, bioorthogonal labeling47, nanoparticle assembly48, and surface modifications49. Despite its well-known limitations—including poor solubility50 (water solubility <0.1 mM), difficulty in modification, and lack of optical activity—CB[8]’s unmatched 1:2 recognition capability remains indispensable in many studies (Fig. 1). This underscores the urgent need for new macrocyclic hosts that not only provide high-affinity 1:2 recognition51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58 but also offer additional advantages, thus expanding the toolbox of supramolecular chemistry and unlocking new, versatile applications across various fields.

Fig. 1: Schematic illustration.

Schematic representation of the application of the host@2guest (H@2G) complex in supramolecular polymers, hydrogels, and organic frameworks. And a comparative analysis of the characteristics of cucurbit[8]uril (CB[8]) and corral[4]BINOL (C[4]B), both exhibiting 1:2 binding capability.

In our previous work59,60,61,62, we have developed a new class of water-soluble, enantiopure chiral macrocycles, namely RRRR- or SSSS-corral[4]BINOL (R- or S-C[4]B)59,60. With their deep, nonpolar, chiral cavity, C[4]Bs exhibit exceptionally high 1:1 recognition affinities for a range of hydrophobic guests, such as steroidal compounds. Given that their cavity width (approximately 7.1 Å) and volume (389 Å3) are comparable to CB[8], we hypothesized that they could also achieve high-affinity 1:2 recognition. In this study, we systematically investigated the 1:2 recognition properties of C[4]Bs using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), UV-Vis, and fluorometric titrations. The results revealed that C[4]Bs’ high 1:2 binding affinity (ranging from 109 to 1017 M−2), even surpasses that of CB[8]. Moreover, C[4]Bs’ excellent water solubility, modifiable structure, and strong fluorescent emission address the limitations of CB[8].

Theoretically, C[4]Bs can achieve most of the functions of CB[8], and even surpass them in many aspects. However, the most distinctive feature of C[4]Bs lies in their chiral nature, which significantly expands their functional possibilities. To demonstrate this, we showed that C[4]Bs facilitate efficient enantioselective 1:2 recognition of chiral guests and transfer chirality to non-chiral dyes, generating amplified circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) with |glum| up to 1.1 × 10−2, which is among the highest reported for chiral host-dye complexes. These findings establish C[4]Bs’ not only as promising alternatives to CB[8], but also as a versatile platform for developing chiral functional materials.

Results and discussion

Determination of 1:2 binding affinities by titrations

The RRRR-corral[4]BINOL and SSSS-corral[4]BINOL used in the experiments were obtained using established synthetic procedures60, the experimentally determined solubility was found to be >10 mM. Inspired by CB[8], we selected 11 singly positively charged planar aromatic compounds (Fig. 2) as potential guests for the formation of 1:2 host-guest complexes with C[4]Bs (K12 = K1 × K2). To investigate the host-guest recognition, we primarily employed ITC titration, which provides clear and reliable information on binding stoichiometry and constants, along with thermodynamic parameters essential for elucidating the driving forces behind the recognition process. For certain guests, significant changes in fluorescence and UV-Vis spectra were observed, promoting us to use fluorometric and/or UV-Vis titrations in conjunction with ITC to further probe the host-guest interactions. By combining multiple titration techniques, we obtained robust evidence for the 1:2 host-guest recognition between C[4]Bs and the selected guests, enhancing the reliability of our binding constant determinations. All experiments were conducted in 10 mM PBS buffer to minimize pH-related variations and complexities.

Fig. 2: Investigation of the 1:2 complexation behavior between R-C[4]B and selected analytes.

a Schematic illustration of the formation process of R-C[4]B@2guest homoternary complex. b Structures of selected analytes and ranges of binding constants with R-C[4]B in PBS buffer solution.

As an example, thioflavine T (ThT), a well-known fluorescent dye, was titrated into a R-C[4]B solution in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) buffer (Fig. 3). The ITC titration curve (Fig. 3b, c) revealed two distinct transitions, suggesting the formation of a homoternary complex (R-C[4]B@2ThT). Fitting the data to a sequential binding model yielded the following binding constants: K1 = (5.4 ± 1.5) × 108 M−1, K2 = (2.4 ± 0.6) × 106 M−1, and the overall binding constant, K12 = 1.3 × 1015 M−2. Both K1 and K2 were found to be driven by a favorable enthalpic hydrophobic effect, particularly for K2. UV-Vis titrations (Fig. 3d, e) further confirmed the high-affinity 1:2 complexation. Upon titrating R-C[4]B into a ThT solution (10 μM), the absorption band of ThT redshifted from 412 to 430 nm, with a well-defined isosbestic point at 425 nm. On further addition of R-C[4]B, the absorption peak continued to redshift to 451 nm, with a second isosbestic point appearing at 438 nm. These two consecutive isosbestic points confirmed the two-step binding process (1:1 and 1:2 complexes) and provided a K12 = 4.2 × 1015 M−2, with K1 = (1.5 ± 0.7) × 109 M−1 and K2 = (2.8 ± 0.8) × 106 M−1 by fitting to a 1:2 host-guest binding model. Fluorometric titrations further supported the 1:2 recognition between R-C[4]B and ThT. A noticeable two-stage fluorescence enhancement was observed (Fig. 3f, g) upon gradually adding R-C[4]B to a 2.0 μM ThT solution. The binding of ThT to the host restricts the dye’s rotational and vibrational motions, significantly reducing non-radiative deactivation pathways, thereby dramatically enhancing the fluorescence. By tracking the fluorescent intensity at 600 nm and fitted to a 1:2 host-guest binding model, the binding affinities of the R-C[4]B@2ThT complex were determined to be K12 = 2.8 × 1015 M−2, with K1 = (9.3 ± 0.4) × 108 M−1 and K2 = (3.0 ± 0.7) × 106 M−1. Thus, the three titration methods (ITC, UV-Vis, and fluorescence) consistently demonstrate the two distinct binding stages (1:1 and 1:2 complexation) between R-C[4]B and ThT, with highly consistent binding constants across all techniques.

Fig. 3: Investigation of the 1:2 complexation behavior between R-C[4]B and ThT in 10 mM PBS buffer solution.

a Schematic illustration of R-C[4]B@2ThT homoternary complex. b Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) isotherms obtained by adding ThT (800 μM) into a 19.5 μM solution of R-C[4]B at 25 °C. c The analyzed data of ITC isotherms with the sequential binding model. d UV-Vis titration spectra obtained by adding R-C[4]B (up to 18 μM) into a 10.0 μM solution of ThT. e The fitting curve plot by tracking absorbance at λ = 430 nm. f Fluorometric titration spectra obtained by adding R-C[4]B (up to 3.6 μM) into a 2.0 μM solution of ThT. g The fitting curve plot by tracking emission intensity at λ = 600 nm, with the nonlinear curve fitting by using 1:2 host-guest binding model. The binding constant is the average of two experiments and the error indicated is the calculated standard deviation.

The exceptional binding affinity of R-C[4]B for ThT has prompted further investigation into its 1:2 recognition ability with a diverse range of ten additional guests, including two quaternary ammonium salts (G1 and G2), six pyridinium salts (G3–G8), and two organic dyes, methylene blue (MB) and thiazole orange (TO), as depicted in Figs. S20–S40. Binding constants for nine of these guests were determined using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), with the exception of G1, which was characterized using fluorometric titrations. For G7 and MB, UV-Vis titrations were also employed, while TO was additionally investigated by fluorometric titrations to cross-validate the results. All titration data are summarized in Table 1. The results reveal that for the two quaternary ammonium salts (G1 and G2), K12 values range between 109 and 1010 M−2. For three 4-phenylpyridinium salts (G3–G5), K12 values are consistently in the range of 1011 M−2, while for the three 4-styrylpyridinium derivatives (G6–G8), K12 are even higher, ranging from 1012 to 1014 M−2. Notably, these binding affinities are comparable to those reported for CB[8] with similar guests. Surprisingly, the K12 values for R-C[4]B with MB and TO reach e 4.9 × 1016 M−2 (UV-Vis titration) and 1.7 × 1017 M−2 (UV-Vis titration). To the best of our knowledge, these values represent the highest binding affinities reported for 1:2 ternary host-guest complexes2.

Thermodynamic analysis, as summarized in Table 1 and Table S1, provides further insights into the complexation mechanism for each guest. Across all binding processes, the free energies (ΔG) are predominantly driven by highly favorable enthalpic contributions, indicating that non-classical hydrophobic interactions are the primary driving force. Additionally, a substantial entropic contribution is observed in K1, similar to the findings with CB[8]. Structural analysis suggests that the increased entropy resulting from desolvation due to the large hydrophobic surface area of the dyes significantly enhances the binding process. Quantitative analysis of cooperativity was further conducted by using the interaction parameter (α = 4K2/K1). When the value of log α is larger than 0.5, the system displays positive cooperativity; when log α is smaller than −0.5, the system displays negative cooperativity; and when log α is between −0.5 and 0.5, the system is noncooperative63,64. As Table 1 showed, G1, G4, ThT, MB, and TO exhibit negative cooperativity, while the others show noncooperative. Specifically, for ThT and TO systems, the observed negative cooperativity arises from an initial large entropy gain (−TΔS1 <−4.0 kcal mol−1) due to hydrophobic core burial, followed by a significant entropy penalty (−TΔS2 > 2.7 kcal mol−1) during the second guest binding. This two-stage thermodynamic profile aligns perfectly with established mechanisms of hydrophobic effect-driven negative cooperativity reported in prior studies38,63,65,66,67.

NMR characterizations for the 1:2 homoternary complexes

NMR characterizations were performed to gain deeper structural insights into the 1:2 host-guest complexes in solutions. As a representative guest, G5 was selected to form a homoternary complex with *R-*C[4]B and characterized in D2O using 1H NMR. As shown in Fig. 4, the proton signals of G5 undergo dramatic upfield shifts upon complexing with *R-*C[4]B, compared to free guest, demonstrating a strong shielding effect exerted by the aromatic walls of the host. Specifically, the upfield shifts of the protons in G5 follow the order: H2 ≈ H3 (3.0 − 3.2 ppm) > H4 (2.5 ppm) » H1 (1.6 ppm) » H6 (0.68 ppm) > H5 (0.51 ppm). This demonstrates varying degrees of shielding for each proton, which reflects their positions within the host cavity. The most strongly shielded protons, H2 and H3, are likely situated at the center of the cavity. This is further confirmed by 1H-1H nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY), which shows clear correlations between the host proton Ha and guest protons H2 and H3 (Fig. S3). Protons H1 and H5 in pyridinium unit exhibit smaller upfield shifts than the corresponding H4 and H6 in 4-methoxyphenyl unit, respectively, suggesting that the pyridinium unit is positioned further from the cavity’s center compared to the 4-methoxyphenyl unit. This can be attributed to the more hydrophilic nature of the charged pyridinium unit, making it more exposed to the solvent.

Fig. 4: 1H NMR spectra of host–guest complex.

Top: 2.0 mM G5; Middle: 1:2 mixture of 1.0 mM R-C[4]B and 2.0 mM G5; Bottom: 1.0 mM R-C[4]B. (400 MHz, D2O, 298 K).

Systematic NMR titration experiments were performed for all 11 guest molecules (Figs. S4–S14). The results demonstrate fast-exchange dynamics between C[4]B and most guests on the NMR timescale. Among all guests, only ThT and TO displayed slow-exchange behavior, likely due to their relatively stronger binding affinities. Additionally, the formation of 1:2 host-guest complexes was further confirmed by mass spectrometry analysis of R-C[4]B@2G1, R-C[4]B@2G2, R-C[4]B@2G4, R-C[4]B@2G7, and R-C[4]B@2ThT (Figs. S15–S19).

Based on these NMR data, we propose that the two G5 molecules in the *R-*C[4]B cavity adopt a slightly offset antiparallel stacking arrangement, as illustrated in the schematic. This antiparallel arrangement minimizes electrostatic repulsion and favors direct dipole–dipole interactions, while the slight offset allows the hydrophobic 4-methoxyphenyl groups to be fully encapsulated within the cavity, with the more hydrophilic pyridinium units exposed to the solvent. Further analysis of the ¹H NMR spectrum for the *R-*C[4]B@2G7 complex reveals a similar pattern of chemical shift changes (Fig. S1), supporting that G7 adopts the same binding mode as G5. Similar antiparallel stacking mode have also been observed in the homoternary complexes of CB[8]. These detailed NMR analyses provide critical evidence for the structural arrangement of the 1:2 host-guest complex, highlighting the strong interactions between *R-*C[4]B and its guests.

Energy-minimized conformations for the homoternary complexes

The energy-minimized conformations of *R-*C[4]B@2G5 homoternary complex was then calculated using density functional theory (DFT) method at the B3LYP-D3/631G(d) level (Fig. 5a, b)68, and the corresponding independent gradient model based on Hirshfeld partition (IGMH) analysis (Fig. 5c, d) were also performed69,70, in which interactions are expressed in green. The results indicate that the two guests are encapsulated in an antiparallel orientation within the cavity, aligning with the previously drawn conclusion. Notably, the weak interactions identified by IGMH analysis reveal varying interactions observed between the guests and the host cavity, involving the [π···π] interactions between the guest’s aromatic rings and the aromatic wall on the host, and [CH···π] interactions between the hydrogen atoms on the guest’s aromatic rings and the aromatic wall of *R-*C[4]B on the other side. Additionally, there are two distinct interaction patterns between the guests, [π···π] and [CH···π] interactions, indicate that the guests have formed H aggregates. Further energy-minimized conformations and IGMH analysis for the *R-*C[4]B@2G6 complex reveals a similar result (Fig. S45), supporting that G6 adopts the similar antiparallel stacking mode as G5.

Fig. 5: Calculated energy-minimized conformations of R-C[4]B@2G5 homoternary complex.

a Top-down and b side-on views of the energy-minimized conformation of R-C[4]B@2G5 using DFT calculations at the B3LYP–D3/6-31G(d) level. c Top-down and d side-on views of the intermolecular binding isosurfaces of the R-C[4]B@2G5 obtained from an independent gradient model based on Hirshfeld partition (IGMH) analysis (ρ = 0.004 au).

Fluorescent discrimination of chiral guests

The unique chirality and fluorescence emission properties of C[4]Bs represent significant advantages over CB[8]. Building on this, we explored the potential of C[4]Bs for fluorescent discrimination of chiral guests through 1:2 host-guest complexation. As shown in Fig. 6a, the addition of S-1-NA to a solution of S-C[4]B resulted in an initial sharp increase in fluorescence intensity by 24%, followed by a gradual decrease. In contrast, the introduction of the other enantiomer, R-1-NA, led to an initial rapid decrease in fluorescence intensity by 18%, followed by a gradual decline (Fig. 6b). These distinct fluorescence responses highlight the enantioselective binding behavior of S-C[4]B. By monitoring the fluorescence intensity at 400 nm and fitting the data to a 1:2 host-guest binding model (Fig. 6c), the binding affinities of the S-C[4]B@2S-1-NA and S-C[4]B@2R-1-NA complexes were determined to be K12 = 1.1 × 1010 M−2 and K12 = 3.0 × 109 M−2, respectively, with an enantioselectivity (α) value of 3.5. The binding constants and enantiomeric selectivity of the other chiral host, R-C[4]B, further validate the robustness of these results, as demonstrated in Figs. S25–S26. The remarkable 1:2 chiral recognition capabilities of C[4]Bs, combined with their distinctive fluorescence response characteristics, underscore their significant potential for further exploration and development in the field of chiral sensing.

Fig. 6: The fluorescent discrimination of chiral guests S-1-NA and R-1-NA upon 2:1 complexing with S-C[4]B.

a Changes in fluorescence spectrum of 2.0 μM S-C[4]B upon addition of S-1-NA (up to 80 μM). b Changes in fluorescence spectrum of 2.0 μM S-C[4]B upon addition of R-1-NA (up to 74 μM). c The fitting curve plot of S-C[4]B upon addition of S-1-NA and R-1-NA for emission at λ = 400 nm, according to the nonlinear curve fitting with 1:2 host-guest binding model.

Chiral transfer and CPL amplification upon 1:2 complexing

The transfer of chirality from chiral macrocycles to achiral dyes through host-guest interactions presents an attractive strategy for inducing chiroptical properties, such as circular dichroism (CD) and circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) signals, in achiral dyes58,71,72,73,74,75,76,77. However, examples of host-guest complexes involving chiral macrocycles, such as cyclodextrins78 or helic[6]arenes79,80, with dyes to generate CPL in solution have typically reported relatively low luminescence dissymmetry factors (|glum | ) in the range of 10−4 to 10−3. Given that C[4]Bs can form stable 1:1 and 1:2 complexes with dyes such as ThT and TO, we explored the potential for chirality transfer from C[4]Bs to these guest dyes via host-guest recognition. Therefore, we prepared aqueous solutions of R- and S-C[4]Bs with ThT and TO to form 1:1 and 1:2 host-guest complexes and measured their CD and CPL spectra.

As shown in Fig. 7b, f, the free R- and S-C[4]B display CD signals below 400 nm, while both free ThT and TO are CD-silent. However, upon forming 1:1 and 1:2 complexes with R- and S-C[4]B, new CD signals emerge above 400 nm, corresponding to the absorption regions of ThT and TO. The CD signals of the R- and S-C[4]B complexes are mirror-image symmetric, indicating effective chirality transfer from the chiral host to the achiral dye in their ground state. Notably, the CD signals of both the host C[4]B and the guests (ThT or TO) in 1:2 complexes are significantly stronger than in 1:1 complexes, indicating that binding two guests imposes greater conformational constraints on the host. This enhances the host’s CD signal and facilitates more effective chiral transfer54,78 from host to guest in 1:2 complexes compared to 1:1 complexes.

Fig. 7: Schematic illustration and characterization of the photophysical properties of the host-guest complexes in PBS buffer solution.

Formed by R- or S-C[4]B with a−d ThT or e−h TO. b, f CD spectra, c, g emission spectra, d, h CPL spectra. In (b, d, f, h), host@guest binary complexes are formed by mixing 10 μM host with 10 μM guest, host@2guest homoternary complexes are formed by mixing 10 μM host with 20 μM guest, and the concentration of free host is 10 μM. In (c, g), host@guest binary complexes are formed by mixing 10 μM guest with 12 μM host, host@2guest homoternary complexes are formed by mixing 10 μM guest with 5.0 μM host, and the concentration of free guest is 10 μM.

We also measured the fluorescence spectra of the four host-guest complexes. As shown in Fig. 7c, g, both ThT and TO are typical TICT (twisted intramolecular charge transfer) dyes, exhibiting very weak fluorescence in aqueous solution. However, upon complexation with R-C[4]B to form 1:1 and 1:2 complexes, the fluorescence intensity of both dyes increased significantly. For example, the fluorescence intensity of R-C[4]B@ThT was enhanced by 386-fold compared to free ThT, and R-C[4]B@2ThT showed a 67-fold increase. Similarly, for TO, the fluorescence increase was more significant for the 1:2 complex compared to the 1:1 complex. These results suggest that the hydrophobic cavity of R-C[4]B significantly enhances the fluorescence emission of both ThT and TO, likely due to the restriction of their motion within the host cavity.

We further examined the CPL spectra of the four host-dye complexes. As shown in Figs. 7d and S41, the CPL signals for both R-C[4]B@ThT and S-C[4]B@ThT exhibit mirror-image Cotton effects with peaks at 490 nm and a luminescence dissymmetry factor (|glum|) of 1.3 × 10−3. In contrast, the 1:2 complexes, R-C[4]B@2ThT and S-C[4]B@2ThT, display mirror-image Cotton effects at 560 nm with a significantly enhanced |glum| of 5.0 × 10−3, which is 3.6 times higher than that of the host alone (|glum| = 1.4 × 10−3). Notably, the CPL signals for the 1:1 complexes of TO (R-C[4]B@TO and S-C[4]B@TO) were negligible. However, for the 1:2 complexes, R-C[4]B@2TO and S-C[4]B@2TO, a high |glum| value of 1.1 × 10−2 was observed, surpassing the free host by 7.8 times, as shown in Figs. 7h and S42. This represents one of the highest |glum| values reported for chiral host-guest complexes in solution. These results demonstrate that the 1:2 complexes exhibit stronger CPL induction and greater enhancement compared to the 1:1 complexes. This is likely due to the more restricted conformational motion of the dyes in the 1:2 complexes, facilitating more efficient chirality transfer and thus yielding a higher CPL dissymmetry factor. However, given the conformational dynamics and structural complexity of the ternary supramolecular system in solution, elucidating the clear structure-property relationship governing chirality transfer/amplification within the C[4]B cavity remains a significant challenge.

Therefore, the binding of two achiral dyes to R- or S-C[4]B not only dramatically enhances their fluorescent emission but also induces notable chiral photophysical properties. It is important to note that the assembly of the ThT and TO homoternary complexes was achieved at a relatively low concentration (10 μM), owing to the high binding affinity (ranging from 1015 to 1017 M−2) that ensures stable 1:2 complex formation. This high affinity makes these complexes versatile and applicable across a range of concentrations for potential applications—such as bioimaging and biosensing—in solution phase. Thus, R- or S-C[4]B-based 1:2 homoternary complexes provide an excellent platform for constructing various CPL materials with tunable properties.

In conclusion, we have thoroughly explored the 1:2 complexation properties of the emerging chiral macrocycle corral[4]BINOLs (C[4]Bs) with 11 singly positively charged planar aromatic guests. Through a combination of various titration techniques (ITC, UV-Vis, and fluorometric), along with NMR and DFT calculations, we have unambiguously demonstrated that C[4]Bs form stable homoternary complexes with binding affinities ranging from 109 to 1017 M−2. Such ultrahigh recognition affinities in the aqueous phase are comparable to or even surpass those observed with CB[8]. Therefore, we believe that in many research and practical applications, C[4]Bs can outperform CB[8] while also offering new opportunities due to their distinct advantages. These advantages include dramatically enhanced solubility, greater ease of chemical modification, and attractive fluorescent properties. Most importantly, C[4]Bs possesses inherent chirality, enabling it to selectively differentiate chiral enantiomers and induce strong circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) with |glum| values up to 1.1 × 10−2 through 1:2 complexation with achiral dyes. Moreover, high-affinity 1:2 binding is expected to enhance the detection limits of chiral sensing and the stability of CPL-active complexes, potentially enabling functionality across a broader concentration range. Therefore, we propose that C[4]Bs represents a unique chiral noncovalent connector, capable of linking two motifs with exceptional affinity within a chiral cavity in aqueous solutions. This opens up significant opportunities for chirality-related studies, such as supramolecular asymmetric catalysis, chiral supramolecular polymers, chiral supramolecular organic frameworks (cSOFs), bioimaging, and so on. Related investigations are underway in our laboratory.

Methods

Chemicals

All the reagents and solvents were commercially available and used as received unless otherwise specified purification. Ni(cod)₂ (≥98.0%), Cod, 2,2’-bipyridine (≥99.5%) were purchased from Energy Chemical. DMF (AR), toluene (AR), sodium hydroxide (AR), methanol (AR) and sodium sulfate (AR) were purchased from Macklin Inc. THF (HPLC grade), acetonitrile (HPLC grade), were purchased from J&K Scientific. The spherical C18 silica gel column (20–45 μm, 100 Å) was obtained from Santai Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.

Synthesis procedures60 and characterization of RRRR- or SSSS-corral[4]BINOL

A Schlenk tube containing Ni(cod)2 (0.56 mmol), cod (0.65 mmol), 2,2’- bipyridine (0.58 mmol), DMF (0.3 ml), and toluene (0.3 ml) was stirred at 90 °C for 30 min under N2 atmosphere. Then (R) or (S)-diethyl 2,2’-(7,7’-dibromo-[1,1’-binaphthalene]-2,2’-diyl)diacetate (0.24 mmol) dissolved in toluene (2.4 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, t