Oppo has raised the bar with the Find X9 Pro. The successor to the Find X8 Pro performs significantly better and offers a comprehensive package that doesn’t have to hide behind the Galaxy S25 Ultra or iPhone 17 Pro Max. On the contrary, thanks to the best hardware packaged in an almost borderless design, the flagship from Oppo plays in the absolute high-end league.

The new LUMO image processing, especially its automated way of providing maximum image details, offers significant potential and will, hopefully, set a new standard. The Dimensity 9500 in the Oppo smartphone has minor weaknesses, but it can certainly compete with the competition, including the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5.

However, the Find X9 Pro also exhibits very pronounced SoC throttling - in some cases, the flagship throttles almost 80 percent of its performance, which significantly lowers our overall rating.

What is particularly interesting for potential buyers of the Find X9 Pro is that there are hardly any restrictions compared to the global version with the Chinese variant. Besides the much lower price, the imported device also offers several benefits, not just drawbacks.

Pros

+ bright LTPO panel

+ extra large battery

+ high-quality housing with 2 additional keys

+ good cameras

+ long update promise for Europe

+ fast SoC

Cons

• deficits in sustainability transparency

• throttling

• relatively heavy and angular

The Oppo Find X9 Pro is coming to Europe with 16 GB RAM and 512 GB storage for an RRP of €1,299 (approx. US$1,500), but only in the colors Charcoal and White.

If you want a cheaper price and more storage variants, or only want to own the red version, you can also purchase the CN model with a multi-language package. The basic model starts at 5,299 yuan (approx. €635 - US$735), with an import costing at least around €780.

$7.99

Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible with Oppo Find X9 Pro Screen Protector Tempered Glass，Case Friendly [High-definition scratch-resistant, 9H hardness]

• $7.82

KJYFOANI For Oppo Find X9 Pro (6.78“) Screen Protector Tempered Galss, [2 Pack] High Clear [9H Hardness] [Bubble Free] Screen Tempered Glass Protective Film For

• $6.87

FZZSZS (3-Pack Designed for Oppo Find X9 Pro Screen Protector, Anti Scratch 9H+ Tempered Glass Film, HD Easy Installation Bubble Free Screen Protector for Oppo Find X9 Pro (6.78“)

Table of Contents

1. Verdict
2. Specifications of the Oppo Find X9 Pro
3. Case - Waterproof Android-phone with IP69 rating
4. Features - Oppo smartphone with fast USB 3.2
5. Software - Oppo Find X9 Pro with Android 16 and long updates
6. Communication and GNSS - Android-phone with 5G and WiFi 7
7. Phone functions and voice quality - Android smartphone with eSIM
8. Camera - Best hardware with Hasselblad branding
9. Accessories and warranty - Oppo Find X9 Pro comes with power adapter, but not in Europe
10. Input devices and operation - Android-phone with ultrasonic sensor
11. Display - Oppo smartphone with LTPO panel
12. Performance - Alternative to the Galaxy S25 Ultra with MediaTek SoC
13. Games - Oppo Find X9 Pro not ideal for gamers
14. Emissions - Flagship phone doesn’t get super hot
15. Battery life - Android phone with silicon-carbon battery
16. Notebookcheck overall rating
17. Possible alternatives in comparison

The successor to the Find X8 Pro brings with it some notable innovations. This starts with the design, as the Find X9 Pro has a fresh look with a rectangular camera module.

In addition, the battery has grown to an impressive 7,500 mAh and the chipset has also been updated. With the new Dimensity 9500 again on MediaTek, which is currently the only real competitor to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5.

Processor

Graphics adapter

Memory

16 GB

Display

6.78 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO AMOLED, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 454 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, Satellite connectivity support (1TB 16GB RAM model only)

Networking

802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G: 850/900/1800/1900MHz; 3G: Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19; 4G FDD: Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/66/71; TDD: Band 38/39/40/41/42/48; 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n71/n75/n76/n77/n78/n79, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.3 x 76.5 ( = 0.33 x 6.35 x 3.01 in)

Battery

7500 mAh Silicon-Carbon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.5, 7P, OIS, 1/1.28“) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 6P, ultrawide) + 200 MPix (f/2.1, 6P. OIS, tele, 3x optical zoom) + 2 MPix (f/2.4. monochrom) Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, AF, 1/2.76“)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, case, USB cable, charger (CN version), ColorOS, 24 Months Warranty, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), Galileo (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

224 g ( = 7.9 oz / 0.49 pounds), Power Supply: 106 g ( = 3.74 oz / 0.23 pounds)

Price

1299 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Oppo Find X9 Pro color variants

The Find X9 Pro impresses with its first-class workmanship. The front is protected with Gorilla Glass Victus 2, which makes it highly resistant to scratches and drops. Oppo does not specify which material is used on the back.

The 8 millimeter slim case is IP68 and IP69 certified and feels good in the hand, although the aluminum frame combined with the flat back looks angular. With a weight of 224 grams, the Find X9 Pro is also not exactly light.

The customizable snap button, for example, for the AI assistant or for switching between vibration and ringing, as well as the dedicated camera button for quick access to the camera app, are practical.

The flagship phone impresses with a very good display-to-front ratio of over 91%, with the edges kept extremely narrow at just around one millimeter, ensuring an almost borderless appearance. This also makes the phone somewhat more compact than the Find X8 Pro, despite having the same display size.

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Vivo X200 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Oppo Find X8 Pro Oppo Find X9 Pro DIN A6 ❌

The Find X9 Pro is only available in one memory variant in Europe, while several options (256 GB to 1 TB) are offered in China. Whether it’s the global or Chinese version, both use LPDDR5X RAM and omit the slightly faster LPDDR5T; UFS 4.1 is used for the internal memory.

The USB port supports the fast 3.2 standard, including image output and OTG functionality. An NFC chip and an infrared blaster are also integrated. The Find X9 Pro does not come with ultra-wideband wireless technology.

Together with the Find X9 series, Oppo has also released the new ColorOS 16 based on Android 16. The focus is on improvements in speed and energy efficiency through intelligent resource allocation.

The design has also been tweaked to convey an interplay of light and shadow and allow different folder sizes. Users can now set moving photos or videos as the background and use the always-on display in full screen.

During the test period, Oppo is combining its ColorOS version 16 with security patches from October 2025. There are some question marks over the planned software support for the China version. Those who opt for the global version are promised 5 major Android versions and 6 years of updates.

Compared to Google or Samsung, Oppo still has some catching up to do when it comes to transparency. Unfortunately, there is no concrete information available on the percentage of recycled materials used in the Find X9 Pro. However, over 90 percent of the critical raw materials used, such as cobalt and neodymium, are reportedly recycled materials.

The focus is not on reparability by the user, and it is almost impossible to check. The Find X9 Pro is not listed in the EPREL database.

The packaging is apparently plastic-free. According to the sustainability report, 45% of the fibers used should also come from recycled materials.

Although the Find X9 Pro offers the maximum possible bandwidth with WiFi 7, the China version of the flagship does not support the 6 GHz frequency band for WiFi transmissions. As with the Find X8 Pro, the global representative should be able to handle this.

In combination with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, our test sample only connects in the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands, although a high speed is still possible with our WiFi 6E router thanks to VHT160 in the 5 GHz frequency band.

According to the data sheet, there are no major differences between the Find X9 Pro for Europe and China in terms of frequency support. Our Oppo phone from the Far East also uses LTE bands 20 and 28, as well as a wide range of 5G frequencies. Network problems are therefore not to be expected with the flagship smartphone.

Networking Oppo Find X9 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be iperf3 transmit AXE11000

932 (min: 738) MBit/s ∼52%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1461 (min: 1265) MBit/s ∼85%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be iperf3 transmit AXE11000

956 (min: 795) MBit/s ∼53%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1609 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼93%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

933 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼53%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1620 (min: 1407) MBit/s ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be iperf3 transmit AXE11000

595 (min: 484) MBit/s ∼33%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1721 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼100%

Vivo X200 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be iperf3 transmit AXE11000

644 (min: 520) MBit/s ∼36%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1561 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼91%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼32%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼99%

Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼64%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼74%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%

Average of class Smartphone

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

719 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

746 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼43%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼78%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼87%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø563 (494-652)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1480-1722)

Oppo Find X9 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø932 (738-1248)

Oppo Find X9 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1461 (1265-1701)

To test the positioning accuracy in everyday life, we took the Find X9 Pro on a short bike ride and compared the measured values with a Garmin Venu 2 as a reference. At best, the Oppo phone’s position is determined using dual-band GNSS and a fast Satfix - even inside buildings.

The high-end smartphone proved to be very accurate during the route of our practical test; even in curves or when changing direction, we could only detect marginal inaccuracies.

The call quality with the Find X9 Pro is intelligible and sufficiently loud both with the hands-free mode and via the earpiece.

VoNR and VoLTE are offered, as well as VoWifi. If you want to use an eSIM, you must opt for the global version, as our China version only supports classic dual SIM with two nano-SIM cards in this country.

Selfie with the Oppo Find X9 Pro

On the front, the Find X9 Pro uses a new 50 MP sensor from Samsung (S5KJN5), which achieves good results utilizing the pixel binning method. Much more interesting, however, are the cameras on the back, featuring Hasselblad branding, especially the new 50 MP main camera.

A 1/1.28-inch stacked sensor from Sony (LYT-828) is used for this, which should cover a particularly wide dynamic range thanks to Hybrid Frame HDR. A new feature is that photos can now be taken automatically in different resolutions, such as 12 MP, 26 MP and 50 MP - depending on the lighting conditions and temperature, the in-house LUMO image processing, based on the ISP, NPU, GPU, and CPU unit, should provide the best possible details in the photos.

The results are very good in daylight, and the dynamic range in the photos is really first-class. The images taken in low light are somewhat less convincing, as the soft focus blurs some details. There are also occasional problems with the white balance, where a magenta color cast is visible in the photos.

For zoom photos, a 200 MP lens with a 1/1.56-inch sensor (ISOCELL HP5) is installed, which allows a 3x optical magnification and macro function. This means that the Find X9 Pro is certainly not at the top level, especially at long focal lengths; however, the results are really good within a zoom range of 3x to 10x, which is often relevant for everyday use.

The ultra-wide-angle camera, which was taken over from the Find X8 Pro, is somewhat weaker in terms of quality. At this point, we refer you to our comprehensive Camera test of the Oppo flagship, which includes even more photo material.

The cooperation with Hasselblad provides the Find X9 Pro with some familiar features, such as the XPan mode or the Hasselblad Master mode with 16-bit RAW. Videos can be recorded in UHD with up to 120 frames per second, optionally also in 8K30 format.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle

click to load images

Under controlled lighting conditions, we analyze the color reproduction of the Sony main camera in comparison to the actual reference colors. The 50 MP lens reveals a slight overexposure in the ColorChecker Passport. However, we can only identify a few outliers in color fidelity (ΔE>10) for the Find X9 Pro.

5.7 ∆E

7.6 ∆E

10.7 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

6.4 ∆E

9.6 ∆E

10 ∆E

2.3 ∆E

6.1 ∆E

6.2 ∆E

6 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

1.4 ∆E

11.5 ∆E

7.6 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

7.1 ∆E

8.8 ∆E

7.1 ∆E

6.1 ∆E

9.1 ∆E

ColorChecker Oppo Find X9 Pro: 7.4 ∆E min: 1.37 - max: 11.61 ∆E

18.4 ∆E

21.3 ∆E

19.1 ∆E

21.6 ∆E

21.6 ∆E

19.8 ∆E

27.8 ∆E

15.1 ∆E

16.7 ∆E

19.7 ∆E

23.4 ∆E

28.3 ∆E

15 ∆E

22.6 ∆E

13.8 ∆E

23.1 ∆E

20.9 ∆E

19.4 ∆E

17.8 ∆E

15.4 ∆E

15.8 ∆E

22.4 ∆E

18 ∆E

12.2 ∆E

ColorChecker Oppo Find X9 Pro: 19.54 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 28.31 ∆E

Hasselblad camera kit of the Find X9 Pro

Our China version comes with a case and quick-charging power adapter, a charging cable (USB-C to USB-A), a SIM pin, and a quick start guide. A film is also installed on the screen. Our loaner Trading Shenzhen adds an EU adapter for the charger to the scope of delivery. The Super VOOC Charger is not included in the global version.

The optional Hasselblad camera kit for the Find X9 Pro, including protective cover, handle and lens, which transforms the main camera into a telephoto camera with 10x optical zoom, can be purchased in Europe for an RRP of 549 euros. As an import, interested parties can get the accessories at a significantly lower price. However, the camera kit only convinced us to a limited extent, given the high price.

Our imported device comes with a 12-month Warranty. In the event of a warranty claim, Trading Shenzhen offers the option of sending the smartphone to a German shipping address. The global model comes with a 24-month warranty, but is not officially available in Germany.

The capacitive touchscreen has a sampling rate of 240 Hz and responds quickly to inputs. Animations are displayed very smoothly thanks to the 120 Hz panel. There is also splash water touch and glove detection, both of which worked reliably in the test, with the touchscreen even recognizing thick polyester gloves. A linear motor is responsible for vibrations, which provides crisp haptic feedback.

The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the OLED display and is based on ultrasound technology, which works very reliably and quickly detects our finger. A biometric unlocking option is made possible via a face unlock function using the front camera in 2D mode.

Subpixel structure

The 6.78-inch AMOLED display achieves a resolution of 2,772 x 1,272 pixels and therefore delivers a very nice sharpness of 450 ppi. The LTPO panel with a refresh rate of 1 Hz to 120 Hz should achieve a brightness (HBM) of 1,800 nits.

In our measurement, we achieve around 1,100 cd/m² with a pure white display. However, OLED panels typically exhibit a significantly more pronounced luminosity with the APL18 pattern, which is more relevant in everyday life. This is also the case with the Oppo smartphone, which has a brightness of 1,785 cd/m², in compliance with the manufacturer’s specifications. The maximum display brightness is reportedly 3,200 nits, possibly at specific points when playing an HDR video.

The OLED technology in the Find X9 Pro uses pulse width modulation to control the screen brightness. According to the manufacturer, high-frequency PWM dimming at 2,160 Hz is offered, which minimizes the negative effects of flickering. We measure a base frequency of 466 Hz with the Rigol software.

1076 cd/m²1094 cd/m²1100 cd/m² 1063 cd/m²1105 cd/m²1085 cd/m² 1077 cd/m²1055 cd/m²1099 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1105 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1083.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.3 cd/m² Brightness Distribution: 95 % Center on Battery: 1105 cd/m² Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²) ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.02 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79} ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5} 98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D) Gamma: 2.244 CCT: 6411 K

| | Oppo Find X9 Pro
LTPO AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8“ | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9“ | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9“ | Oppo Find X8 Ultra
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8“ | Vivo X200 Ultra
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8“ | Oppo Find X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8“ | | | ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————– | ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— | ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— | ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– | ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————— | –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– | | Screen | | -5% | -53% | 14% | 3% | 10% | | Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1105 | 1099 -1% | 1357 23% | 1366 24% | 1286 16% | 1167 6% | | Brightness (cd/m²) | 1084 | 1067 -2% | 1350 25% | 1325 22% | 1238 14% | 1160 7% | | Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 95 0% | 94 -1% | 95 0% | 93 -2% | 98 3% | | Black Level * (cd/m²) | | | | | | | | Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.02 | 1.05 -3% | 3.1 -204% | 0.88 14% | 1.04 -2% | 0.87 15% | | Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.32 | 2.38 -3% | 4.7 -103% | 1.55 33% | 2.26 3% | 1.64 29% | | Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.7 -21% | 2.2 -57% | 1.5 -7% | 1.6 -14% | 1.4 -0% | | Gamma | 2.244 98% | 2.232 99% | 2 110% | 2.303 96% | 2.249 98% | 2.311 95% | | CCT | 6411 101% | 6779 96% | 6391 102% | 6626 98% | 6575 99% | 6426 101% |

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 465.6 Hz Amplitude: 17 %

The display backlight flickers at 465.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 465.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

The ColorOS 3 settings options for the color display are not extensive, but three profiles, including color temperature selection, should be more than sufficient for most users.

We examine the deviations with the Calman analysis software. In the “Standard” profile, the sRGB color space is selected and almost completely covered. Differences in the individual colors are not visible to the eye, and the measured DeltaE values are very low.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise ↘ 0.8 ms fall The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise ↘ 0.7 ms fall The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

The viewing angle stability is very appealing, and colors remain unchanged. Only the brightness drops slightly at flat viewing angles.

The Find X9 Pro remains very easy to read outdoors, but reflections on the glossy surface of the display glass can reduce readability.

The Find X9 Pro is based on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, which is built on the new ARM v9.3 architecture and features a C1 Ultra Prime core with clock frequencies of up to 4.21 GHz.

The single-core performance in Geekbench is slightly worse than that of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max. However, thanks to three C1 Premium cores (3.5 GHz) and four C1 Pro cores (2.7 GHz), the multi-thread performance is on par.

The Find X9 Pro is surprisingly weak in the PCMark system benchmark and in the AI tests. The latter has always been a strength of the Dimensity chips.

Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

3640 Points +4%

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3511 - 3635, n=2)

3573 Points +2%

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

3511 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

3200 Points -9%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

3145 Points -10%

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

2976 Points -15%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

2605 Points -26%

Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=212, last 2 years)

1732 Points -51%

Multi-Core Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (10378 - 10941, n=2)

10660 Points +3%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

10620 Points +2%

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

10378 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

10020 Points -3%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

9722 Points -6%

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

9284 Points -11%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

7480 Points -28%

Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=212, last 2 years)

5055 Points -51%

Antutu v10 - Total Score Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

2981365 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)

2981365 Points 0%

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

2845517 Points -5%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

2760009 Points -7%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

2390211 Points -20%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

2374537 Points -20%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

2262067 Points -24%

Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=154, last 2 years)

1456001 Points -51%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

20764 Points +49%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

19833 Points +42%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

18897 Points +35%

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

15938 Points +14%

Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=190, last 2 years)

14716 Points +5%

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

13977 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)

13977 Points 0%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

12314 Points -12%

BaseMark OS II Overall Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

13325 Points +24%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

12929 Points +20%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

11073 Points +3%

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

10756 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)

10756 Points 0%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

10697 Points -1%

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

8155 Points -24%

Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14076, n=149, last 2 years)

7494 Points -30%

System Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

18137 Points +17%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

17171 Points +10%

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

15554 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)

15554 Points 0%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

15326 Points -1%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

12891 Points -17%

Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=149, last 2 years)

11236 Points -28%

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

10953 Points -30%

Memory Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

17355 Points +111%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

13505 Points +64%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

11234 Points +36%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

9432 Points +14%

Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=149, last 2 years)

8485 Points +3%

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

8243 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)

8243 Points 0%

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

7081 Points -14%

Graphics Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

384996 Points +688%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

56004 Points +15%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

53231 Points +9%

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

48863 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)

48863 Points 0%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

45562 Points -7%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

42332 Points -13%

Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=149, last 2 years)

25088 Points -49%

Web Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

2322 Points +10%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384

2143 Points +2%

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384

2109 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)

2109 Points 0%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

2095 Points -1%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384

1923 Points -9%

Average of class Smartphone ([858 - 2363, n=149, last 2 years](https://www.