If I understand things correctly, most steam games current rely on xwayland or a compositor specific feature to position their window on the user’s preferred monitor, while in a wayland-only scenario the wayland devs prefer to have it open randomly, and the application should be able to be resized without any error, despite the fact that I always want it to open on my preferred monitorBeen reading some of the current discussion over the wayland protocols related to global positioning, e.g. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/264, though it gets into some other discussions about multi-window apps that need to move their windows dynamically around the screen. Some of the sentiment that I’m getting is that some, not all, of the waylands devs want to remove the idea of global positioning at all costs, even if it breaks existing UI paradigms that are still in use and are thriving over on windows and macos. Some of the cross-platform toolkits have their own devs in the discussion, like SDL, and tbh I would feel frustrated in their position too because if I had to support windows, macos, and linux/wayland, I honestly feel like there would be no other way to handle this besides just saying, “the user experience on wayland is borked and is impossible to fix on our end“Why is it not impossible to provide a protocol that implements global positioning, and then leave it up to the compositors if they want to support it in the first place? I feel like that would leave applications functioning correctly on regular desktop setups, while giving other setups like VR the choice to say, hey, we don’t support global positioning because it literally makes no sense here. Reading these wayland discussions is honestly maddening