Analyst Insight*: Global supply chains face a paradigm shift. For years, the focus was on visibility — tracking orders, shipments and inventory. Today, companies must prove where and how products were made, with verifiable evidence across multiple supplier tiers. This shift from visibility to transparency isn’t optional; converging regulations, tariff enforcement and market expectations are making it a business imperative for 2026 and beyond.*

Global trade volatility has reached unprecedented levels. Companies now navigate overlapping regulations, shifting tariffs, geopolitical disruptions and logistics uncertainty simultaneously. The data requirements have expanded dramatically — compliance now demands proof of origin, chain of custody documentation, environmental and social data, and multi-tier manufacturing records. Regulations such as the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) require documentation proving that goods are produced free of forced labor. The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) mandates geolocation coordinates proving deforestation-free sourcing. The EU Digital Product Passport will extend transparency requirements post-sale, embedding product origin and composition data throughout the lifecycle.

Visibility means seeing what’s happening: events, statuses and inventory positions. Transparency means understanding and trusting what you see, including origins, practices, compliance evidence and audit trails. It’s no longer enough to know where a shipment is and when it will arrive. Companies must prove where and how products were made, whether to support product claims, meet regulatory requirements or provide evidence that goods were legally sourced and not illegally transshipped to avoid tariffs. The stakes are significant: Non-compliance risks fines, penalties, brand reputation damage and exclusion from key markets.

Despite years of focusing on cross-functional alignment, the expanding landscape of environmental, social and governance (ESG) and supply chain risk regulations is leading many organizations to recreate silos, involving new processes, new tools, and disconnected data efforts for every emerging requirement. This fragmentation makes compliance harder, increases supplier fatigue, and slows the ability to turn data into insight. The companies succeeding at transparency treat it as an extension of existing supply chain operations. Rather than deploying isolated traceability platforms, they embed transparency requirements into their existing trade workflows. This integrated approach accelerates implementation and makes compliance a natural byproduct of doing business, rather than an additional burden requiring separate systems and processes.

Companies with digitally connected supplier networks hold a decisive advantage. They already have the relationships, data flows and digital infrastructure in place, and can extend their existing systems to capture transparency data rather than deploying a separate platform. Multi-tier transparency becomes a natural expansion of existing business processes.

This complexity explosion has outpaced human coordination. Artificial intelligence automates data collection, validation and intelligence across supplier tiers, making comprehensive traceability achievable at scale. What once seemed insurmountable is now within reach.

*Resource Link: *https://www.infor.com/solutions/scm/infor-nexus

Outlook: Regulatory timelines may shift, but the direction is clear: Multi-tier transparency is becoming table stakes. Companies that act now gain multiple advantages, reducing risk of detentions, fines and lost revenue while eliminating supply chain opacity that drives waste, production delays, capacity constraints and material risks. Building connected supplier networks takes time. Those who start early will transform compliance pressure into brand differentiation and premium positioning, turning regulatory requirements into competitive moats while competitors scramble reactively.